Review: ‘Dragon Blade’ is unnecessarily dull at times (Includes first-hand account)

In history, many leaders earn their distinctions of success through cruelty and fear. However at least an equal number of chiefs may be recognized for their compassion and intellect, though they are more often forgotten. In wars throughout the ages, both methods have been practiced with fervour and effect. In Dragon Blade there are many heads to look to for leadership, each with their own means of creating loyal soldiers and victorious operations.

Huo An (Jackie Chan) leads a group of men assigned to keep the peace on the Silk Road, which can be tricky when 36 nations claim a portion of it. Unfortunately they are set up and their careers ended, forced to serve their sentences rebuilding a Chinese city on the Road. Shortly after the Protection Squad’s arrival, a Roman Legion approaches the territory. With no other defences, Huo An and his men go out to meet the soldiers whose leader, Lucius (John Cusack), demands shelter and aid for a sick boy. A natural threat compels them to form an alliance and the two groups learn to co-exist. But an even greater menace marches toward them with an army of thousands and a desire to rule the entire Silk Road. Working together they have a fighting chance, but Tiberius’s (Adrien Brody) ruthlessness makes their task more difficult.

The second act is reminiscent of similar war movies in which coalitions turn into friendships as the newfound partners combine their efforts to achieve an ultimate goal. In this case, the prisoners are tasked to reconstruct Wild Geese Gate in an impossible 15 days. Combining their knowledge and skills, they find shortcuts to building the wall — all the while implying the Roman way is the better way. On the other hand when it comes to loyalty and combat skills, both Huo An’s and Lucius’ men are formidable.

The final act pits Tiberius’s forces against everyone. The brutality of this section is very much in conflict with the harmony demonstrated earlier in the film. Even though the peace they achieve couldn’t last forever, the bloodshed that takes place is quite abrupt. Nonetheless, the scenes on the battlefield are the movie’s strongest. The vast armies clashing and using their distinctive skills to get the upper-hand are quite impressive. Unfortunately the events leading up to these fights are less so. The film generally prefers to look back on events rather than allow them to play out in real time. As a result most of the major narrative developments are shown in slow, melodramatic flashbacks, which stunt the movie’s flow.

Nonetheless, Chan is accustomed to playing ancient Chinese warriors, so this role is well-suited to him. His character is somewhat of an ambassador, so he conveniently speaks English, Chinese and a few other languages. His army also uses an interesting chain system that links their swords to their wrists, which leads to some notable fight moves. Though Brody is not on screen for most of the film, his character does play a significant role in the overall story. As a result, he gives a few rousing speeches and then takes part in the picture’s climactic final battle that is unfairly tilted in his favour. Cusack, on the other hand, has the depth to play a general forced to make the hard choices; but he lacks the toughness also expected of a seasoned soldier. In the end he’s adequate, but someone else may have been better.

Director: Daniel Lee
Starring: Jackie Chan, John Cusack and Adrien Brody

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Mummy’ needs its priorities reordered (Includes first-hand account)

    It’s no longer unusual to see studios looking for new ideas to reach back into their histories and reboot old ideas or franchises. For many who’ve watched the originals, this ranges from a minor irritation to an outright offense. But the reality persists and it’s arguably unfair to judge a movie before watching it, or to carry preconceptions into a screening. So (almost) every picture deserves a fair shake, but then it’s open season. The latest film up for reboot judgement is The Mummy and it seems there may have been a good film in there somewhere.

  • Review: Wes Anderson’s style transfers brilliantly to ‘Isle of Dogs’ (Includes first-hand account)

    Anthropomorphizing animals has been a common technique in fictional narratives for decades. It allows storytellers to convey tales in a manner that may be more effective or less jarring for viewers… and sometimes, it’s just more entertaining. Writer/director Wes Anderson has focused most of his career on live-action dramas featuring increasingly famous actors and developing a very distinct style, but he now appears to be embracing animation to deliver his unique stories with the latest being Isle of Dogs. Yet if audiences dig a little deeper, they’ll notice many of the same themes as seen in his other pictures — just in a different format.

  • Review: ‘Return to Sender’ shows rape-revenge movies can be subtle (Includes first-hand account)

    Trauma affects people in a variety of ways. There is no escaping its memory, but how it manifests for each individual can vary. For some it’s crippling, perpetual fear; for others it’s strength, anger… vengeance. Closure also comes in many forms; some peaceful, others less so. Many films have centred on the aftermath of a painful experience with contrasting paths and results. The latest is Return to Sender, which follows one woman’s recovery after a vicious attack.