Review: ‘Going in Style’ has considerable flair (Includes first-hand account)

There’s an intriguing phenomenon occurring in Hollywood at the moment: a generation of accomplished, acclaimed actors and filmmakers are getting old. In spite of being over the traditional age of retirement, they are still flourishing and working well into their 70s, 80s and even 90s. However, in order for them to do so, the types of narratives being told had to mature with them. Consequently, there has been a perceptible increase in the number of films made featuring older protagonists — the trick is to make them appeal to all ages. The latest in this series of films is Going in Style.

Willie, Joe and Albert (Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine and Alan Arkin, respectively) have been friends for nearly three decades, having worked most of their lives together at the steel mill. But they’ve recently found themselves in a financial bind since they stopped receiving their pension cheques. While at the bank to contest the impending seizure of his house, Joe becomes a hostage in an armed robbery by some very polite, masked thieves. Desperate and out of options, he suggests to his two friends they should consider doing the same — take back what they’re owed from the corporate crooks that took it. With less than 30 days to plan and lacking the skills to even carry out a successful heist at a grocery store, they recruit a professional lowlife to show them the ropes. Then it’s just a matter of not getting caught.

This is essentially the senior’s version of Ocean’s Eleven, but featuring an inexperienced crew rather than a group of career delinquents. However, in spite of being a smaller team, the three actors match their counterparts in talent and wit combined. Arkin, unsurprisingly, plays the cynic of the group and he does so flawlessly. His curmudgeonly resistance to the idea and outright protest in one instance is a constant source of humour. Caine is the charming dreamer who must persuade his companions they can pull off the robbery… and that, if caught, they won’t be in much worse a position than they are now. Freeman is Caine’s charismatic equal, but is a much more private individual. Christopher Lloyd also has a memorable supporting role as another of their amusingly forgetful friends. With this cast, it looks like director Zach Braff‘s job was easy; moreover, the veteran actors appear to be having a great time on screen — an experience that turns out to be contagious for the audience.

The actual robbery and planning takes place in the last act, which leaves a lot of time to get to know these characters and the reasons for them to take such a significant risk — the realities of which are made apparent in the hours and days following the heist. But leading up to the big day, they have playful conversations with the waitress (Siobhan Fallon Hogan) at their favourite diner, experiment with marijuana and spend time with their loved ones, including Al’s new girlfriend (Ann-Margret). Containing the whole story to 96 minutes means the film moves at a decent pace and no one scenes is stretched to an uncomfortable length. The result is a fun and entertaining night at the movies with a few of our favourite actors.

How To Rob A Bank Tip #43: Don’t put it on Snapchat. #GoingInStyle is now playing! Get tickets today! pic.twitter.com/E2J5nKxKqJ

— #GoingInStyle (@GoingInStyle) April 7, 2017

Director: Zach Braff
Starring: Morgan Freeman, Michael Caine and Alan Arkin

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Luce’ defies expectations, but what’s going on behind that smile (Includes first-hand account)

    Everyone likes an underdog story. Seeing people/teams/animals succeed against all odds appeals to audiences because it makes them feel good by proxy. However, not a lot of thought is often given to the pressure these expectations can place on the one carrying everyone’s hopes on their shoulders. Of course they want to be successful for themselves, but there’s the added burden of potentially disappointing all their supporters if they don’t finish on top. Sure they say your best is good enough, but there’s always that little voice in the back of your mind that whispers it’s not true. In Luce, a young man faces all of these issues with mixed results.

  • Review: Ian McKellen is the most relatable ‘Mr. Holmes’ (Includes first-hand account)

    It’s difficult to imagine our heroes growing older and becoming less competent. They often seem as if they would remain ageless and infallible forever. This is only true of fictional characters, but they also provide an opportunity to address these issues through a personality with which people are already familiar and perhaps attached. It allows for a different perspective on the story and negates the necessity to build a connection because one already exists. Mr. Holmes features an aged Sherlock desperate to solve one last case.

  • Review: ‘Hell or High Water’ blends tradition with contemporary drama (Includes first-hand account)

    No matter what people say, sometimes defining right and wrong is a tricky business. The differences aren’t as clear as black and white nearly as much as people would like. Moreover, the answers can change depending on who you ask and/or on what side of the debate their interests lie. What one person may view as an offense, the other sees as justified retribution. But these gray areas are often the most interesting to explore, particularly in the realm of fiction. In Hell or High Water, the main characters definitely have a difference of opinion when it comes to the legitimacy of their actions.