Review: Time travel movie ‘Synchronicity’ keeps it all straight (Includes first-hand account)

Time travel is a tricky business. Toss in parallel worlds and free will, and you don’t know where you might end up or what you could alter. The rules and consequences change from film to film, but there are generally some similarities which allow the viewer to become more easily acquainted with the protagonist’s situation; divining which systems are in play is part of the fun. Synchronicity takes an interesting approach to the science fiction narrative, encouraging viewers to piece together the puzzle for themselves.

Jim Beale (Chad McKnight) and his team members, Chuck (AJ Bowen) and Matty (Scott Poythress), have achieved the impossible: they’ve discovered the secret to time travel. Unsurprisingly the key ingredient in their formula is exceedingly expensive, requiring them to partner with a shady businessman (Michael Ironside) to obtain the necessary component to test their machine. The experiment is a success, but it has unexpected consequences. As the story progresses, it’s difficult to distinguish between cause and effect, and Jim’s involvement with the beautiful Abby (Brianne Davis) is the source of an additional distraction.

This fascinating story is told in two parts. The first half follows the experiment through from their first pass to the second, exploring Jim’s conflicting interests in furthering his career and seducing Abby. The second half deals with the exact same period, but from a perspective that demonstrates how their invention affected the timeline. The dual viewpoint of the matching occurrences is remarkably thought-provoking, compelling audiences to draw the lines between the corresponding incidents in each fragment. The chicken-or-the-egg conundrum still applies, but is not a significant aspect of the narrative. Instead, once the theory of parallel universes is introduced by one of Jim’s associates, it opens the movie to infinitely more possibilities.

The premise will remind some viewers of the indie sci-fi picture, Primer, which is one of the best time travel narratives ever produced in spite of its constrained budget. Aesthetically, the world beyond the lab is very similar to the one depicted in Blade Runner; ominous skyscrapers blocking the dark sky and modern décor ornamenting rooms that overlook the metallic landscape. In addition, the neo-noir synth score creates an atmosphere reminiscent of its futuristic predecessors.

The protagonist in these movies is generally in the most challenging role as they are required to meet the demands of rather complex scripts and exhibit a range of conflicting emotions. McKnight definitely fulfills his obligations as the lead actor, convincingly playing the multi-faceted part of a conflicted time traveller. Abby is suspicious but unawares for most of the picture, which requires Davis to simply remain mysterious in everyone’s eyes. The rest of the supporting cast is secondary, but Ironside is always an excellent villain.

The film screened at the 2015 Toronto After Dark Film Festival.

Director: Jacob Gentry
Starring: Chad McKnight, Brianne Davis and AJ Bowen

Similar Posts

  • Review: Silence is ‘The Demolisher’s greatest asset (Includes first-hand account)

    Most people are familiar with the five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. However, the journey past the second step can be more difficult for some, leaving them in a prolonged state of madness. These individuals are more easily driven to bad decisions as they attempt to channel or bury their wrath, which can manifest in hair-trigger tempers or substance abuse. In The Demolisher, a man directs his pain into vigilantism.

  • Review: TIFF 2016: ‘The Belko Experiment’ is designed to ensure success (Includes first-hand account)

    In an attempt to understand how humans carry out certain acts or why they exhibit specific behaviours in particular situations, the scientific community conducts social experiments. Designed to recreate or mimic predetermined conditions, the test subjects’ responses are monitored, recorded and examined to try to gain a greater understanding of how or why people do things. Some of these studies and/or methods have been controversial, though they’ve provided invaluable statistics. However, key elements of these trials are the participant’s consent and assurances to prevent physical harm — The Belko Experiment lacks either of these components.