A scene from ‘Anatomy of a Fall’

Review: ‘Anatomy of a Fall’ painfully dissects a marriage’s private moments

‘Anatomy of a Fall’ is the uncomfortable scrutiny of a less-than-perfect woman and an even less perfect marriage when her husband dies unexpectedly.

It’s supposed to be “innocent until proven guilty,” but the court of public opinion tends to make up its mind long before all the evidence is presented. Consequently, since most of the people that sit on a trial are also part of the public, it can be difficult to ensure a case is decided entirely on the facts and not the personal feelings of the jury or judge. Thus, it’s often up to the lawyers to not just present their case, but sway the attitudes of the decision-makers to take their side regardless (or in spite) of what they’ve heard. Anatomy of a Fall is as much about whether the defendant is a murderer as it is whether she’s a good person.

Sandra (Sandra Hüller), Samuel (Samuel Theis) and their visually-impaired son Daniel (Milo Machado Graner) moved to a secluded house in France not long ago. She’s a successful writer and he’s a professor — a literary power couple on paper. One day, Daniel returns from taking his dog on a winter walk to find his father’s body lying in the snow at the side of the house. He screams for his mother who calls emergency services, but it was too late — Samuel was dead. But how did he die? Was he pushed from the balcony? Did he jump out the window? With an inconclusive autopsy, it’s up to the court to decide if Sandra murdered her husband, while their son learns all the gritty details of their imperfect marriage.

In North American trials, it seems more difficult to admit the personal details of the defendant’s life. However, in this French court, it feels as if anything goes with the judge permitting very few objections by the defence. As a result, every transgression, rumour or work of fiction the prosecutors deem relevant is submitted for consideration. Regardless of whether viewers think Sandra is guilty or not, it’s tough not to sympathise as they analyze intimate details of her life with Samuel and she’s forced to defend things that would normally go undetected or be forgotten.

Watching the case unfold is emotionally trying as one can only imagine being put in a position to defend words said in the heat of the moment or refute subjective accounts of your personality and actions. As the only other witness, Daniel becomes a participant in the trial, though it’s fascinating to watch them walk a tight rope during his questioning. Conversely, fewer considerations are given as he sits listening to them rake his mother over the coals, making the hearing that much more uncomfortable.

Setup as a courtroom drama, audiences will become engrossed in the intense trial as Sandra’s personality awaits a verdict.

Director: Justine Triet
Starring: Sandra Hüller, Swann Arlaud and Milo Machado Graner

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Longest Ride’ goes on far too long (Includes first-hand account)

    Good love stories are a hot commodity in Hollywood. It doesn’t always have to be realistic because sometimes it’s the unfathomable nature of their union that makes the couple so enticing. Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers theme consistently emerges in one way or another as two people fall in love in spite of every odd betting against their success or even compatibility. Yet they persevere and audiences are treated to an ending fit for a fairy tale. Many of Nicholas Sparks‘ romance novels follow this formula and have been adapted for the screen; The Longest Ride is one more to add to the list.

  • Review: ‘Swiss Army Man’ is the solution to run-of-the-mill comedies (Includes first-hand account)

    Narratives that are wholly conflicting are a rarity. To know something was enjoyable, but not whether you really liked it or not is a strange and challenging position in which to find oneself. It requires further consideration and analysis, constantly running the risk of over-thinking the film and ruining the possibility of deciding in its favour. But in the case of Swiss Army Man, it almost demands audiences examine its multiple layers and like it because of the many things it offers.

  • Babystar review: TIFF 2025

    ‘Babystar’ goes behind the scenes of an influencer family to expose the harsh realities of always having to be camera ready.

  • Review: ‘Chef Flynn’ is a delectable look at a child prodigy (Includes first-hand account)

    When people think of prodigies, it’s often related to arts such as music or academics such as math. Regardless of the specialty, it’s a label applied to young people who have a natural gift for something that takes other people years of practice to do or comprehend. Their particular genius allows them to know inherently how something is done and excel with seemingly little effort. Consequently, they’re so consumed by this one thing, most other areas of their life, such as unrelated studies and relationships, suffer. Chef Flynn is about a young man who was a pre-teen phenomenon in the kitchen and is realizing his professional dreams before many kids his age have even decided on a career.

  • Review: ‘Where’d You Go, Bernadette’ rides on a stellar performance (Includes first-hand account)

    Being a genius has often gone hand-in-hand with a prevailing sense of individuality, and some level of quirkiness and/or social awkwardness. It’s thought their minds work differently than other people’s, not just in terms of their brilliance but how they relate to the world and other humans. Thus, relationships can be quite challenging, more so for the other person who must learn to accept, tolerate and/or adapt to the prodigy’s eccentricities. There are certainly ups and downs, and not all connexions can survive the extra pressure, but those that do can be wonderful. In Where’d You Go, Bernadette, the stress becomes a little too much and a family reaches its breaking point.