Review: ‘The Riot Club’ inspires conversation, but is it the right one? (Includes first-hand account)

With all the indignation currently directed at white men in power and people of privilege around the world, it’s interesting to view a movie that exemplifies all the qualities despised in the advantageous. This film particularly takes aim at the old boys clubs and secret societies that purportedly allow and encourage disrespectful behaviour because their members have the resources to “make it go away.” The Riot Club begins as a group of boys united by their love of women and trouble, but gradually turns ugly as their above average station in life becomes a weapon against the less fortunate.

The Riot Club was established when Lord Riot (Harry Lloyd), a young, adventurous man, was murdered by his lover’s husband. To celebrate their friend’s untimely demise, his cohorts established the club in his honour to love and live life to the fullest as he did. More than a century later, the tradition endures at Oxford University. The current membership requires two more bodies to meet its quota so they begin to scout the first-year students. Miles Richards (Max Irons) and Alistair Ryle (Sam Claflin) could not be more different from each other, but each has qualities the club admires; namely they are wealthy, smart and attractive. Their initiations are followed by an annual dinner, which is transformed into a drunken rally for supremacy.

This movie is a darker version of The Skulls in that it deals with a similarly rooted secret society, but without the sexy soundtrack or cool heist sequence. The behaviour of these young men is generally appalling. Their utter disregard for material things, expecting everyone to be effortlessly bought and boundless egotism only scratch the surface of what is inherently wrong with them. Miles is the only member with any redeeming qualities, though even he is complicit until their underlying superiority complexes begin to show through.

On the other hand, the overt prejudice and ease with which they are incited to live up to the club’s name is somewhat heavy-handed. This is clearly a condemnation of the upper class from the moment audiences are introduced to the characters and one’s father is demanding his son be assigned their family’s traditional dorm room. The flexing of their affluent muscles remain restrained until the dinner, but it’s also clear from the moment they step foot in the establishment that the party will get dangerously out of hand.

Nonetheless, credit must be awarded the actors who portray these despicable young men for not holding back and embracing even their characters’ worst moments to the fullest. This is a feat of particular distinction for Claflin, Sam Reid and Douglas Booth who have been far more charming in recent film history as heroes and love interests rather than pompous brats. Not to be forgotten, Holliday Grainger is admirable, essentially portraying the film’s sole female voice. She not only confronts the pitfalls of the company of entitled men, but must also face the derision of belonging to a lower class.

Laura Wade adapted her play for the screen and under Lone Scherfig‘s direction, the film does not attempt to extend the story world further than is required. After all, the key decisions are mostly made behind closed doors or away from the prying eyes and ears of commoners anyway.

Director: Lone Scherfig
Starring: Sam Claflin, Max Irons and Douglas Booth

Similar Posts

  • Review: Hot Docs’ ‘Screen on Screen’ puts movies at the forefront (Includes first-hand account)

    Going to the cinema is generally considered a form of escape. Just this month, audiences sat shotgun with the team in Fast 7, fell in love for the first time in The Longest Ride, and saw the world through the eyes of acclaimed photographer Sebastião Salgado in The Salt of the Earth. But there are so many ways to experience film; the audience’s experiences will differ widely from the experiences of the actors and crew who made the picture. At the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, the “Screen on Screen” program investigates people’s relationships with movies. One of this year’s selections discusses the deliverance some cinephiles found in American productions, while another examines the effects of being a star in the Hollywood system.

  • Review: ‘A Christmas Horror Story’ is a gift-wrapped Halloween treat (Includes first-hand account)

    Since retail stores insist on displaying Halloween and Christmas decorations at the same time, why shouldn’t that crossover apply to other things like movies? Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas is the chief (and least horrific) example in which the holidays intertwine; but other films include the Silent Night, Deadly Night series, Black Christmas and a killer Santa Clause short in the Tales from the Crypt movie. The latest picture to frighten the cheer from yuletide celebrations is A Christmas Horror Story.

  • Review: ‘Rams’ shows varied resilience in the face of conflict (Includes first-hand account)

    Being blood relatives doesn’t foster an immediate affinity or adoration of each other. Family feuds can be the most virulent as they tend to run deeper than simple disagreement and are often passed on to or inherited by future generations. However, on occasion, desperate or tragic circumstances can force even the most loathsome to put aside their differences. In Rams, two brothers and neighbours have not spoken in 40 years but a sickness in their community may demand change in more ways than one.

  • Review: Hot Docs’ ‘PACmen’ expands on craziness of the 2016 US election (Includes first-hand account)

    The American electoral system is a strange beast with many influencing heads. The system itself is questionably multi-tiered, while it seems an unknown number of external groups can also attempt to sway the vote in their desired direction. In 2010, two Supreme Court decisions led to the creation of the political action committee (PAC), which made it legal for these entities to engage in unlimited political spending as long they did not make contributions to candidate campaigns or parties. Unlike traditional PACs, a super PAC can raise funds from individuals, corporations, unions, and other groups without any legal limit on donation size. In 2015, PACmen became the first film to go behind the curtain of one of these groups.

  • Review: ‘The Strangers: Prey at Night’ is a massacre instead of thriller (Includes first-hand account)

    In the movie industry, “leaving well enough alone” isn’t a phrase that carries much weight. Even when it seems like they’ve struck lightening by achieving an acceptable level of acclaim or success, it’s just a reason to recycle and repeat. Usually this happens in the form of a remake or an immediate sequel, capitalizing on whatever formula worked the first time around. However, occasionally (though more frequently as of late), someone decides to continue a story years after the original. The narrative time that’s past is often comparable to the gap between films and in most cases the original characters return for another go. The latest follow-up to an older movie is The Strangers: Prey at Night.