Review: ‘A Wrinkle in Time’ gets somewhat lost in the folds (Includes first-hand account)

For many young children who lose a parent, it’s more consoling to believe something fantastical took them away and they still exist somewhere out there… it means they may return one day. In most cases, the likeliness of this occurring is slim to none – but most of us don’t live in a world of magic and make-believe. Combining science fiction and fantasy, A Wrinkle in Time is about the enduring hope that a little girl’s father is simply lost somewhere in the universe waiting to be found with the help of a few enchanted guides.

Meg’s mother (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) and father (Chris Pine) are world-class physicists working together on an improbable theory that people have the ability to travel between dimensions if they can harness the correct frequency; it’s called “tesering.” Four years ago, Mr. Murry disappeared without a trace and no one has heard from him. Since his vanishing, Meg (Storm Reid) has experienced behavioural issues at school, leaving her with only one sort-of friend named Calvin (Levi Miller). Her brother Charles Wallace (Deric McCabe), on the other hand, is a sweet and caring prodigy who would do anything for his older sister. Enter Mrs. Whatsit (Reese Witherspoon), Mrs. Who (Mindy Kaling) and Mrs. Which (Oprah Winfrey). These magical femmes offer to help Meg bring her father home, but their journey is more difficult than they expected.

In spite of the notable star power playing key roles in this picture, it’s still little more than an average children’s adventure filled with fantastical, quirky characters and a creative mix of vibrant colours. This means the key to entering the story is the kids, two-thirds of which are great. Charles Wallace is absolutely adorable. He’s got a big personality in a tiny body, and his kind heart and innocence burst from the screen. Calvin isn’t exactly a hero type, though he doesn’t hesitate to jump into the unknown or stick his neck out for his friends, making him a likeable character and welcome addition to their group. Meg, however, is a hardened cynic with a low self-esteem, which is a difficult disposition for a young person to convey; so, sometimes it comes across perfectly and other times it’s a little stunted. Nonetheless, she’s a good actress with a lot of potential… and as Calvin points out, she has great hair.

The adults of the picture are both prevailing and inconsequential. Mrs. Whatsit speaks the most, constantly prattling on and having to be checked by Mrs. Which when she speaks out of turn; though her unfiltered observations can be amusing. Mrs. Who only speaks in quotes, which she appropriately attributes to the owner, making her simultaneously unique and unoriginal but very charming. Mrs. Which is meant to be the wise leader, though she’s generally glued to one spot and mostly requires Meg to come to the answers herself. Still, the trio pop in and out for frequent costume changes, and to lend the occasional piece of advice. Conversely, Meg’s parents are integral to their journey, yet have very little to do with it; while Meg’s principal (André Holland) seems a little out of his depth, though he still tries to offer his counsel. And Zach Galifianakis‘ Happy Medium is simply another odd personality that makes a brief appearance to provide a piece of the puzzle.

An evil is coming. Discover Uriel this Friday when you see Disney’s A #WrinkleInTime in theatres. Get tickets: pic.twitter.com/5lrq1NSVAj

— A Wrinkle In Time (@WrinkleInTime) March 6, 2018

Perhaps because it’s adapted from a book, it feels somewhat incomplete. For the uninitiated, it’s difficult to grasp one of the many threads and hold on as it’s on to the next chapter before there was even time to become familiarized with this one. The final act especially seems fragmented as the kids unceremoniously come face-to-face with the evil “IT,” a darkness that reaches across the universe into the hearts of humans to make them unkind. Regrettably, there’s very little time spent in any one place or with anyone other than the children, so it’s challenging to become engaged in the narrative. Moreover, the abstract concepts and existentialism that infiltrate the middle section seems to stall the picture’s progression in favour of lovely but empty visuals.

The movie is undeniably picturesque with a number of amusing moments and the diverse cast is a commendable change from institutional tradition, but director Ava DuVernay‘s and screenwriter Jennifer Lee‘s runs of success take a slight dip with this interpretation.

Director: Ava DuVernay
Starring: Storm Reid, Oprah Winfrey and Reese Witherspoon

Similar Posts

  • ‘Stronger’ trailer is incredibly detailed (Includes first-hand account)

    As a few years seems to be the threshold of “too soon?” no longer being a significant issue, it’s not surprising to see films depicting events that resulted in tragedy begin to emerge in the years following a calamity. Thus, four years after the Boston Marathon bombing, the second movie about the terrorist attack is set for theatrical release. The first trailer for Stronger provides a detailed overview of the film.

  • Review: ‘The House with a Clock’ will start new generation of horror fans (Includes first-hand account)

    Some of the key elements of young adult fiction is the adolescent protagonist makes mistakes that can be attributed to their immaturity, while also finding the strength to triumph over whatever villain or personal obstacle is at the tale’s centre. This formula is so generic, it allows for any number of narratives in any number of genres, meaning it never gets old because you never have to tell, read or watch the exact same story twice. Thus, even though The House with a Clock in its Walls features some aspects seen in other tales, it is its own picture.

  • Review: TIFF retrospective screens Maurice Pialat’s most successful film (Includes first-hand account)

    French cinema is historically a source of visceral narratives that don’t shy away from provocative subjects. Although director Maurice Pialat struck out at and from his contemporaries, the former painter was undoubtedly a product of the zeitgeist. His fascination with sexuality, Parisian families and tyrannical male figures underlies most of his work and is a reflection of many other French filmmakers; while his realist approach has often been compared to John Cassavetes. The TIFF retrospective, “Love Exists: The Films of Maurice Pialat,” demonstrates the many ways Pialat tackled these subjects in his films, though his most successful would be À nos amours.