Review: ‘Halloween’ erases a franchise and has no regrets (Includes first-hand account)

Sequel, prequel, remake, reboot, reimagining. All of these words mean the current rendition stems from something that came before it, which consequently means it’s not original — though it could have a unique approach. Styles and methods of making films in these categories widely differ as does their quality and acceptance. While there are likely too many of these pictures regularly hitting cinemas, some of them rise above the din by making a notable impression on audiences. Fortunately, the latest franchise installment, Halloween, does all the right things in all the right ways to climb out of October horror obscurity.

After murdering his teen sister at the age of six, Michael Myers (James Jude Courtney/Nick Castle) has spent the last 55 years — minus a brief and deadly escape – in a mental health institution in which he was first the patient of Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasance) and now Dr. Sartain (Haluk Bilginer). But rather than be able to help him, they’ve tried to understand him while keeping him isolated from the world beyond their secure walls. But now even that is over and he’s being transferred to a less hospitable facility. During this time, Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) has prepared for his return. She lives in a self-made fortress equipped with surveillance and an arsenal, praying for the opportunity to stop him for good. Unsurprisingly, this has resulted in a strained relationship with her now-grown daughter, Karen (Judy Greer), and granddaughter, Allyson (Andi Matichak).

The first thing viewers will quickly notice is this movie is a sequel to the original film and ignores all the pictures that occurred between then and now. Laurie survived that horrific night in 1978 and Michael was re-incarcerated, but she hasn’t really lived since. She’s essentially become the Sarah Connor of horror, preparing for an imminent battle and raising her kid in expectation of the same. The key difference is Sarah only heard stories of what was to come, while Laurie had already experienced it once first-hand and refuses to be caught by surprise again.

When Allyson debunks a long-held belief regarding Michael’s fixation on Laurie or repeats the scene in which she sees a “figure” standing outside her school window, franchise fans know they’re in for a movie that understands and appreciates its audience. It carries forward a lot of similarities with its predecessor, including the off-camera violence, slow but deliberate pursuits, unsettling head tilts and a John Carpenter soundtrack. There are also some great kills that rely on the lead-up even more than the murder to captivate viewers. “The Shape” remains an ominous presence, even from a distance, and his bloodlust seems to have only grown over time as he surpasses the kill count from the first picture rather quickly.

David Gordon Green directs what is probably the best entry into the franchise since the original film as it builds on and draws from its predecessor to create a chilling, contemporary follow-up that feels like a natural extension that fans could approve continuing.

Think you’re a big Halloween fan? Prove it. Comment your answers below. #HalloweenMovie pic.twitter.com/UoFkq6j7wU

— #HalloweenMovie (@halloweenmovie) October 17, 2018

Director: David Gordon Green
Starring: Jamie Lee Curtis, Judy Greer and Andi Matichak

Similar Posts

  • Review: Rom com narrator does opposite of ‘Playing it Cool’ (Includes first-hand account)

    Finding “the one” is a complex quest with no sure fire directives. For most people it’s a matter of trial and error, and even then it may not live up to expectations or be everything you pictured. Unfortunately love is not an exact science, though learning from those experiences is part of the journey. In Playing it Cool, a man whose shunned love most of his life is surprised to find his ideal match is unavailable.

  • Review: TIFF 2017: ‘The Lodgers’ cannot escape their unwelcome guests (Includes first-hand account)

    “Blood is thicker than water,” but that doesn’t mean it can’t still be poison. Sometimes one’s relatives can be even worse than the greatest threat they’d face outside the home. Yet, the physiological bond keeps them from seeking escape since leaving a loved one can be incredibly difficult regardless of the circumstances. The reasoning behind these invisible shackles can vary, but their presence is no less restrictive. In The Lodgers, a pair of siblings are prisoners of their enormous house — or, more specifically, of what resides beneath it.

  • TIFF 2015: Director and actor go with the flow in ‘River’ (Includes interview and first-hand account)

    Writing and directing one’s first feature-length film is already a daunting task, but setting it in a communist country halfway around the world is an added challenge that could have had mixed results. Jamie M. Dagg’s thriller, River, is set and shot in Laos, which was no vacation in spite of the exotic location. In addition to the “stifling heat,” there was “very little film infrastructure,” says Dagg. At the same time, “all these little things that seemed insurmountable problems contributed to the film.” The film’s star, Rossif Sutherland, agrees that the limitations were blessings in disguise; “We couldn’t have done it with a bigger budget and crew because we would have been too noticeable… You stick a crane in there and you lose the quality of what it is to be in that place.”