A scene from ‘Fly Me to the Moon’

Review: ‘Fly Me to the Moon’ takes audiences on a bumpy journey

‘Fly Me to the Moon’ is a comedy that questions the validity of the Moon landing, while following a gratuitous romance.

With all the privately funded space tourism, the government’s refreshed commitment to exploration, astonishing images from throughout the galaxy and the popularity of Neil DeGrasse Tyson, the general population has a renewed interest in space and its vast possibilities. But people are fickle, so their interest is not always consistent, making it occasionally necessary to regain their attention and win back their favour. In hard times, that task can be even more difficult as other issues vie for attention or when the perception is already damaged. In Fly Me to the Moon, a PR wizard is recruited to repair NASA’s reputation, while its head engineer tries to ensure they make it the moon.

Kelly Jones (Scarlett Johansson) is the best public relations person currently in the field, using a variety of underhanded (or creative) tactics to secure high-profile clients and ensure their satisfaction with her work. As increased spending and the prolonging of the Vietnam War discourage people from supporting the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) at a critical time, she is recruited by an agent (Woody Harrelson) of Nixon’s government to help the people fall in love again. Meanwhile, Cole Davis (Channing Tatum) is trying to work around budget cuts and an approaching deadline to get Apollo 11 to the Moon and ensure its astronauts safe return home. In spite of a shared goal, the pair frequently clash, forcing Kelly to work in secret on a contingency plan in case the moon mission doesn’t go as planned.

The cleverly comedic script finds a fun way to capitalize on a long-held conspiracy that the 1969 Moon landing was actually filmed on a secret sound stage. Watching the small, hand-picked crew clandestinely replicate the Apollo equipment and Moon’s environment so meticulously, while also trying to mimic decreased gravity for a live broadcast, is amusing and thought-provoking — some viewers may even find themselves questioning the validity of the actual events, if they hadn’t already before seeing the film.  It’s not entirely clear on which side of the debate the filmmakers stand, though they make good arguments for both. But, regardless of the truth, Harrelson once again steals the show, in spite of playing a supporting character.

Conversely, the picture’s downfall is the opposites attract love story that anyone can see coming before Cole and Kelly even share the screen. They’re constantly butting heads, while simultaneously flirting until they inevitably share a kiss. In some ways, it’s a throwback to romance movies of the time with its playful banter and quick deliveries, but it’s also superfluous to the narrative, which could have worked just as well if the pair had remained friends. Similarly, a black cat gag is threaded throughout the movie, but as cute as Mischief is, it would have worked without the ominous feline too.

In the end, the film is a rollercoaster of enjoyable and middling scenes that could have been improved by focusing on the Moon landing and leaving the rest to float away, untethered.

Director: Greg Berlanti
Starring: Scarlett Johansson, Channing Tatum and Woody Harrelson

Similar Posts

  • This week’s releases’ best laid plans all go awry

    This week’s releases include a thrilling sequel; a series reboot; a sci-fi moral dilemma; an experiment gone wrong; a mediocre slasher; a con’s fresh start; and a game-changing TV series.

  • Review: ‘Underwater’ responds well to pressure (Includes first-hand account)

    “Leave no rock unturned” certainly has its pros and cons. As humans scour every inch of the Earth, they turn their sights to the deepest depths of the ocean. Once where no man could survive the pressure, it’s only a matter of time before exploration becomes excavation. But what hides in the dark or deep below the ocean floor? What may our meddling awaken and how will it react to our intrusion? For years, movies have proposed previously undisturbed, uncharted areas were home to creatures ready to exact Mother Nature’s revenge. Consequently, they’ve unleashed something in Underwater and it’s not feeling very welcoming.

  • Review: ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ is all cheers, no tears (Includes first-hand account)

    Origin stories are so powerful — and not just for superheroes. Seeing where and how someone or something began in some ways removes a bit of the mystique; but it can also earn them respect, admiration and gratitude. People are naturally curious, particularly about things they feel close to, so they are keen to consume information and media related to the object at the centre of their fandom. In some ways, it bridges the gap and strengthens their connection to something that will always be out of reach. The aptly titled, Bohemian Rhapsody, is another way into the world of Queen.

  • Review: ‘Aquaman’ is king of the DCEU (Includes first-hand account)

    DC has been trying to follow in Marvel’s cinematic footsteps for years, but they’ve been unable to find the same level of success. In spite of their television shows doing relatively well and gaining significant followings, their films have always been lacking. However, they may finally be moving in the right direction. Parts of Justice League were passable and Wonder Woman blew everything else they’d done out of the water. Now, after introducing several characters in the big screen team-up, it’s time for them to helm their standalone pictures. First up is the king of the sea, though that’s not his title when this movie starts — at first, he was just Aquaman.

  • Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’ delivers on the big things (Includes first-hand account)

    Even though the team found a way to put their differences aside, cracks in The Avengers‘ armour began to show in the last ensemble film. Superheroes no longer exist in a world in which there are no consequences for their actions — Batman v Superman recently dealt with similar themes. But who gets to decide when and where they’re deployed? And if they disagree, whose decision has greater authority? There’s a fine line between regulation and control; and while one may appear essential to co-existence, the other is a significant and probable risk. Captain America: Civil War addresses these questions, dividing The Avengers into opposing factions.