Review: ‘78/52’ invites Hot Docs audiences into the shower with Hitchcock (Includes first-hand account)

Movies are an ingrained element of our culture and an acknowledged form of communicating, directly and indirectly. Cinematic messages can be obvious and built into the narrative, or they can be hidden in the plot and images; sometimes deeper meanings are intended to be understood by some viewers and concealed from others… censors, for instance. Alfred Hitchcock was a master auteur known for circumventing the Motion Picture Production Code with creative framing and the art of inferring rather than showing. One of his greatest and still admired constructions is the shower scene in Psycho, which is thoroughly examined in 78/52.

In 1960, Hitchcock literally changed the way people went to the movies. When Psycho was released in theatres, he required that no one be allowed to enter the show after it began — this was the first time such a request was made of audiences who were accustomed to coming in part way through a film and catching up with what they missed in the subsequent screening. Of course, he wanted to preserve the picture’s many secrets as well as avoid latecomers wondering when Janet Leigh would appear. Yet the shower scene was so much more than a way to shock audiences. It’s meaning and structure has been frequently analyzed, but this documentary is one of the most in-depth examinations to date.

Cinephiles will already be aware of many of the elements discussed in the film, but there’s some lesser known tidbits included for even the most informed fan. Conversely, uninitiated admirers of Hitchcock’s work will find the whole film fascinating and accessible. Historians, horror aficionados, filmmakers, critics and actors, including Guillermo del Toro, Peter Bogdanovich, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood and Jamie Lee Curtis, comment and explore the most minute elements of the scene and its creation. They discuss its implications for the genre as a whole, as well as Hitchcock’s motivations for painstakingly orchestrating such a scene, which lasts mere minutes but took a week to shoot. From Hershey’s chocolate syrup to the reason there’s an unusual cut away from Marion’s corpse, Alexandre O. Philippe‘s documentary is a great follow-up to his equally engaging exploration of the zombie genre.

The Toronto premiere of 78/52 is screening as part of the “Nightvision” program at the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival.

Director: Alexandre O. Philippe

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘John Wick 3: Parabellum’ delves deeper and hits harder (Includes first-hand account)

    Action movies and thrillers driven by revenge have been commonplace since the ‘70s. When someone with access to a gun or other weapons is wronged, it seems to be a recipe for enacting cold, hard, brutal vengeance against everyone responsible. But “every action has a consequence” and unflinching, ruthless violence is bound to eventually draw blood from a forbidden pool. Running only gets you so far and then confrontation, surrender or – if you’re lucky – negotiation become the only options. In John Wick 3: Parabellum, the title character opts for all-out war against anyone who tries to stand in his way.

  • Review: ‘Playing God’ is a tough job at Hot Docs (Includes first-hand account)

    Most people know, understand and have maybe even experienced the direct consequences of tragedy, particularly death. However, when it’s linked to a larger event such as an attack or accident, the complexity of the aftermath increases. One’s personal journey becomes a public event with strangers inquiring about the intimate details of your lives to satisfy their curiosity… or to assess the measurable damages caused by the incident. But how does one decide the worth of a human life? And who has the daunting task of making that decision? In the documentary Playing God, audiences meet a man whose occupation is simultaneously revered and hated.

  • Review: ‘Fifty Shades Freed’ should’ve stayed bound and gagged (Includes first-hand account)

    The ultimate chapter in a trilogy dubbed the “anti-Twilight,” which titillated any reader who could tolerate E.L. James’ abysmal prose, is finally getting its big screen debut. Over three years, the controversial yet sultry adaptations of Anastasia Steele’s unsolicited sexual awakening and subsequent taming of the bully Christian Grey has unfolded in the shadow of jealous lovers, past and present. In spite of being made under the guidance of different directors and screenwriters, a lack of consistency was never going to be the series’ biggest problem as Fifty Shades Freed so plainly demonstrates.

  • Review: ‘It Follows’ is horror at its best (Includes first-hand account)

    Teenagers are bombarded with contradictory ideas when it comes to sex. On the one hand, they are emerging in a hypersexualized environment that asserts it’s fun, it sells and it’s everywhere so it’s not a big deal. Conversely, messages about abstinence, crime and social shaming support the opposite view that sex is private and has severe consequences, particularly for women. The brilliance of indie film, It Follows, is it personifies these pressures to create a terrifying horror movie.