Review: ‘The End of the Tour’ is a compelling journey (Includes first-hand account)

Television series and movies often chronicle the lives of geniuses, either humorously or empathetically portraying the difficulties they have connecting to “normal” people. From misreading social cues to being frustrated by the inability of others to simply understand, they demonstrate that knowing more than the people around you can be devastatingly isolating. And yet their contributions to their fields make them eminent celebrities that everyone wants to meet. The End of the Tour recounts a fleeting connection made between an interviewer and a revolutionary author.

David Lipsky (Jesse Eisenberg) is a writer whose most recent book only experienced marginal success; a shortcoming that weighs heavily upon him. However when he reads an unconditionally stellar review of David Foster Wallace‘s (Jason Segel) Infinite Jest in Time magazine — which labels the book one of the best English-language novels published in 82 years — he insists Rolling Stone assign him to conduct the magazine’s first ever author interview (that they’d never publish). Joining Wallace at his remote homestead in Illinois not far from the university at which he teaches creative writing, Lipsky accompanies Wallace during the last stop on his book tour to Minneapolis.

The majority of the film consists of one long flashback while Lipsky listens to the recordings of his conversations with Wallace, which would inspire his memoir, Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself. It’s presented as the core narrative with the older journalist’s reflection on past events as the framing story. Unfortunately, Lipsky’s sudden case of nostalgia is triggered by the suicide of Wallace 12 years after their initial and only meeting. Though the acclaimed author was indifferent to being interviewed, he speaks very openly with Lipsky about a variety of subjects including love, success, loneliness, an array of insecurities and a brief institutionalization. Yet he only allows the reporter to record their discussions as long as he agrees not to print anything the speaker deems “off the record” five minutes later. Wallace is also very concerned about how Lipsky may represent him in the article, regularly commenting on previous statements and how they could be perceived if quoted. “I don’t even know if I like you yet, I’ve been so nervous of whether you like me,” he admits over dinner.

Wallace is a frequent philosophizer, commenting on the consequences of masturbation (the death of self via solo entertainment) and why women in magazines are less attractive than “real” women, leading him to eventually confess he wears the bandana to “keep his head from exploding.” Over the course of their five days together, it becomes apparent a meaningful friendship between the two would be challenging since they each envied each other’s lives. Wallace yearns for normalcy, which would include someone to come to home to and with whom to share his success and frustrations. Conversely Lipsky wants nothing more than to attain similar heights as a novelist, rising above the mediocrity (“My girlfriend likes your writing better than mine — it’s kind of annoying”). Their mutual jealousy causes them to consistently look at each other with suspicion, worrying the other could somehow steal what they covet. This resentment peaks when Wallace believes Lipsky is flirting with one of his female friends in Minneapolis.

The chemistry between Eisenberg and Segel is perfect as the terms of their relationship constantly shifts levels of comfortableness and congeniality. In spite of initially liking each other, Lipsky’s and Wallace’s roles are inherently in conflict: the interviewer must probe and ask the tough questions, while the subject is permanently self-aware and distrustful. Yet, within this process, no matter how superficial, a connection is made. In the end both actors portray the ultimate sadness these men experienced at this point in their life, neither satisfied with their current situations in spite of their accomplishments. This realization creates a resounding melancholy that underlies the whole narrative, especially given the events that prompt its telling — a feeling communicated by the outstanding performances of these two men.

Director: James Ponsoldt
Starring: Jason Segel, Jesse Eisenberg and Anna Chlumsky

Similar Posts

  • Review: TIFF 20: ‘Ammonite’ digs beneath the stereotypic veneer (capsule) (Includes first-hand account)

    In Ammonite, two women are reborn via their love for each other, even though their affair begins with an expiry date. Mary Anning (Kate Winslet) was a skilled, 19th century paleontologist. However, due to her gender, she was not accepted by her peers. One day a young man arrives with his mourning wife, Charlotte (Saoirse Ronan), and asks Mary to spend time with her during her convalescence. After a rocky start, the pair embark on an intense relationship that significantly changes both of their lives.

  • Out Standing review: TIFF 2025

    ‘Out Standing’ follows the real-life trials of Canada’s first woman infantry member, highlighting the sexism she experienced at every step.

  • This week’s releases unfold under unique circumstances

    This week’s releases include a visceral tale of survival in the harshest of environments; the reincarnation of powerful saviour who must learn to harness her skills; an outrageous thriller featuring body modification and religious; and a parody series that breaks all the rules.

  • Review: ‘John Wick 3: Parabellum’ delves deeper and hits harder (Includes first-hand account)

    Action movies and thrillers driven by revenge have been commonplace since the ‘70s. When someone with access to a gun or other weapons is wronged, it seems to be a recipe for enacting cold, hard, brutal vengeance against everyone responsible. But “every action has a consequence” and unflinching, ruthless violence is bound to eventually draw blood from a forbidden pool. Running only gets you so far and then confrontation, surrender or – if you’re lucky – negotiation become the only options. In John Wick 3: Parabellum, the title character opts for all-out war against anyone who tries to stand in his way.

  • Review: ‘Gold’ is filled with riches and rocks (Includes first-hand account)

    During the Gold Rush, most lands were untouched and anyone could strike it rich with a little luck. But the more metal deposits they found, the harder it became to find new ones. Now trained geologists study the composition of certain areas and try to predict the location of new resources, but it’s not an exact science and there’s more misses than there are hits. In Gold, two guys who’ve experienced significant misses in recent years may have finally found the target.