Review: ‘The Hateful Eight’ takes its unique Western on the road (Includes first-hand account)

Before brick and mortar cinemas became popular, movies and their projectionists used to travel from town to town like the circus. Going to see a film was a special event rather than something to do when you’re bored. This tradition of distinction was renewed with the creation of large-scale productions and the allure of movie stars. Moreover, people didn’t sit in the dark for three-plus hours without a bathroom, snack or cigarette break so they were built into the screening. These are the experiences writer/director Quentin Tarantino is attempting to replicate with the 70 mm roadshow version of The Hateful Eight.

Daisy Domergue (Jennifer Jason Leigh) is a wanted murderer and John “The Hangman” Ruth (Kurt Russell) is the bounty hunter that’s taking her to justice. But a blizzard forces his stage coach to detour and his sliver of humanity insists he pick up two stranded travellers before they freeze to death: Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson) and soon-to-be sheriff Chris Mannix (Walton Goggins). When they arrive at Minnie’s Haberdashery, they’re greeted by another group of travellers — Oswaldo Mobray (Tim Roth), Joe Gage (Michael Madsen) and General Sandy Smithers (Bruce Dern) — and Bob the Mexican (Demian Bichir), temporary keeper of the inn. As they pass the time, John becomes convinced at least one of these men is there to help Daisy escape… but which one?

There could be little doubt that this is a Tarantino film as even those not fond of his work must admit he is an auteur with a particular style of filmmaking. The first half of the picture is dominated by extensive verbal exchanges between the characters. The dialogue ranges from their respective pasts and reputations to their plans once the storm blows over. In spite of the limited scope of their conversations, it’s characteristically wordy and energetic. Each man has his own distinct speech pattern to match his personality in spite of the similarities between their backgrounds and occupations.

Another element as inherent to Tarantino’s films as the discourse is the bloodshed. John is only interested in getting Daisy to town alive — not unharmed; so whenever he disagrees with her behaviour, he has no qualms about responding with an elbow to the face. In this way, he treats her like any other prisoner regardless of her gender; yet it appears crueler because she’s a woman. Otherwise the first half of the film is relatively violence-free, save for some biting comments and insults. However the situation takes an explosive turn after the intermission, resulting in shooting, stabbing and a few people literally losing their heads. The effects are exceptionally exaggerated, more reminiscent of the over-the-top carnage in Kill Bill Vol. 2 than any real brutality as blood packs burst over the scene and gush toward the ceiling.

Tarantino’s decision to shoot and present on 70 mm film gives the movie some distinct qualities. Firstly, the aspect ratio is wider than the typical 16:9. Therefore, viewers are always privy to more of the scene than is usually possible. While there is not constantly something occurring in these expanded sidelines, it does generate a stage-like quality fitting of the genre. The celluloid also produces vivid colours with a realistic texture still not possible with digital, which Tarantino highlights with the outdoor settings and rich costume choices for some of the characters.

Moreover, the backlash regarding his use of the N-word in Django Unchained definitely didn’t deter him from employing it in this film as it’s possible it’s said even more often and surely the most in a single exchange. But it’s still period appropriate since several of the characters are survivors from both sides of the Civil War.

The cast is mostly a who’s who of actors the director has worked with previously, which allowed him to write the parts specifically to their strengths. Thus Goggins’ character talks a lot and uses a lot of ornate language as does Roth who conversely sounds more educated. Russell’s bounty hunter is very direct, while Jackson’s part expectedly includes long speeches… though the topic of his monologue is certainly different. They are all excellent and unsurprisingly fit their roles perfectly, which is normally one more thing that can be relied upon in a Tarantino picture.

Fans of the filmmaker will not be disappointed as it carries all his signature traits, while also allowing him to broach a new genre about which he’s obviously passionate.

Director: Quentin Tarantino
Starring: Samuel L. Jackson, Kurt Russell and Jennifer Jason Leigh

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Loving’ is a rousing yet refined look at unplanned courage (Includes first-hand account)

    It can be difficult to believe that many of the rights women and minorities possess today were only granted in the last 50 years or so. Prejudices permeated governments and authorities, and their discrimination was supported by the law. It takes courage to challenge those who inherently hold the power in a conflict, especially when the penalties threaten to tear apart your family. But it’s often for that same family people find the courage to fight back. In Loving, an interracial couple must go all the way to the Supreme Court to legalize their marriage in the United States.

  • Review: ‘Aladdin’ is a magical ride through a familiar world (Includes first-hand account)

    There are several arguments to be made for and against Disney reaching into their vaults to make live-action versions of their animated classics. On the one hand, it feels as if there’s a lack of new ideas and room for creativity as, arguably, the largest studio in the world rehashes their already bankable narratives. On the other hand, re-envisioning the original stories gives them the opportunity to address any criticisms that may have been leveraged at the movie’s release or over the years. The new live-action version of Aladdin takes a little from column A and a little from column B.

  • Review: ‘Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping’ is going diamond for comedy (Includes first-hand account)

    It takes a distinct level of comedic competence to create an effective mockumentary. Many popular TV shows have dedicated an episode to the craft, while certain feature-length films made their mark by doing it right. The subjects must be captivating, which generally means over-the-top but still engaging; you want to entertain audiences, not annoy them. There needs to be a lot of other personalities that can provide interviews; getting real-life public figures who are willing to contribute to the illusion is even better. On that note, the narrative should be grounded in some identifiable version of reality; audiences ought to believe these characters could exist, even though they shouldn’t for the sake of humanity. The creators of Popstar: Never Stop Never Stopping have a clear understanding of the formula and execute it to a tee.