A scene from ‘Bring Her Back’

Review: ‘Bring Her Back’ doesn’t need you to jump when it can make you recoil

‘Bring Her Back’ is an unconventional possession movie that takes its time building up to the horror that will make audiences cringe.

Death is traditionally marked by rituals. While they sometimes claim to help the deceased in the afterlife, they’re more typically designed to help the living cope with their loss. However, there’s also a superstitious world that believes they can commune with the dead and, in more extreme situations, revive them. But time and again, cinema shows us attempting to reverse death never produces the desired results, trading sacrifices for disappointment. The lesson: bereavement is a process and shortcuts only lead to trouble. In Bring Her Back, orphaned siblings must try to survive their new foster home and eccentric caretaker.

When Andy (Billy Barratt) and Piper’s (Sora Wong) father die, he’s just a few months shy of turning 18 and being old enough to request legal guardianship of his partially sighted younger sister. Andy is used to caring for Piper and the pair refuse to be separated when being assigned to foster care. Laura (Sally Hawkins) was hesitant to take in a teenage boy, but she couldn’t deny giving a home to Piper following the death of her own visually impaired daughter. She’s also caring for Ollie (Jonah Wren Phillips), an even younger boy with aggressive tendencies. Laura seems committed to giving Piper a good home, but she makes odd requests of Andy and tensions between the pair escalate until Piper doesn’t know who to trust.

This movie shares a lot of traits with twin filmmakers, Danny and Michael Philippou’s, feature directorial debut, Talk to Me. Beyond staying in the horror genre, this is also an unconventional possession story that opens with some very troubling imagery. At the centre are individuals experiencing grief, particularly young people who have lost a parent. The main characters are also siblings in both narratives. However, where the first film kept viewers on the edge of their seats with constant action and frequent scary developments, this picture is a slow burn.

Things are only subtly strange at first, which makes it easy to disregard or attribute it to Laura’s quirky personality. The build up to the climax is intentionally slow, only giving viewers glimpses of the evil that lurks within the house. But as the situation becomes gradually more uncomfortable, the audience’s concern for the kids grows. Piper is so vulnerable and easily swayed, she’s literally and figuratively blind to the warning signs. Meanwhile, Andy is walking on eggshells to avoid being rejected, but he can only overlook so much before needing to act. Then there’s Ollie’s unusual behaviour, which is an immediate red flag that’s violently waving by the movie’s end.

While the gist of the film’s plot is clear, there are several unanswered questions raised throughout the picture that may leave viewers feeling perplexed. The inspiration for Laura’s ritual, for example, is eventually defined in its application, but its origins are a vexing mystery that may never be solved. However, the script is filled with the unexpected, which compensates for some of the annoyances. The rest are offset by the great performances.

Hawkins is perfectly suited to the peculiar maternal figure who can appear both caring and terrorizing in the same breath. Barratt and newcomer Wong’s sibling bond seems genuine and their use of a code word that requires they tell each other the truth is heartening. But for such a young actor, Phillips exceeds in his role as the creepy kid and completely owns some of the picture’s most unsettling scenes.

After the success of their first film, the Australian brothers once again reimagine a horror standard, but this time moviegoers will find themselves more disturbed than scared.

Directors: Danny Philippou and Michael Philippou
Starring: Billy Barratt, Sally Hawkins and Jonah Wren Phillips

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘John Wick 3: Parabellum’ delves deeper and hits harder (Includes first-hand account)

    Action movies and thrillers driven by revenge have been commonplace since the ‘70s. When someone with access to a gun or other weapons is wronged, it seems to be a recipe for enacting cold, hard, brutal vengeance against everyone responsible. But “every action has a consequence” and unflinching, ruthless violence is bound to eventually draw blood from a forbidden pool. Running only gets you so far and then confrontation, surrender or – if you’re lucky – negotiation become the only options. In John Wick 3: Parabellum, the title character opts for all-out war against anyone who tries to stand in his way.

  • Review: ‘Fahrenheit 11/9’ tells it how it is as only Michael Moore can (Includes first-hand account)

    There are people who are not inclined to seek out information about politics, social issues or the world at large, but they are more likely to consume this material if it’s presented in the form of entertainment. A movie, documentary, late-night talk show or news satire television program is a digestible source of intelligence that’s able to summarize from a vast array of sources. Of course, that’s not to say those delivering these communications don’t have their own agenda or biases, but it is still a way to ensure people receive information and hopefully take steps to draw informed conclusions. Filmmaker Michael Moore is one of the most prolific producers of issue-based documentaries for the masses and his latest picture is Fahrenheit 11/9 (not to be confused with the previous release, Fahrenheit 9/11).

  • Review: TIFF 2017 — Top 10 films we saw this year (Includes first-hand account)

    Every year following Labour Day weekend in September, downtown Toronto is flooded with moviegoers seeking a transcendent viewing experience and stargazers hoping for a glimpse of any number of the celebrities passing through the city. The Toronto International Film Festival celebrated its 42nd anniversary this year and marked the occasion with some significant changes, including the elimination of the City to City and fan-favourite Vanguard programs as well as two venues, an overall 20 per cent reduction in the number of films selected, and the announcement of CEO Piers Handling’s retirement. Nonetheless, there was still plenty to see and most of the adjustments weren’t even a blip on the radar.

  • Review: TIFF 20: ‘Ammonite’ digs beneath the stereotypic veneer (capsule) (Includes first-hand account)

    In Ammonite, two women are reborn via their love for each other, even though their affair begins with an expiry date. Mary Anning (Kate Winslet) was a skilled, 19th century paleontologist. However, due to her gender, she was not accepted by her peers. One day a young man arrives with his mourning wife, Charlotte (Saoirse Ronan), and asks Mary to spend time with her during her convalescence. After a rocky start, the pair embark on an intense relationship that significantly changes both of their lives.