Review: Hot Docs doesn’t want anyone left in the dark on these issues (Includes first-hand account)

While not all documentary cinema needs to be serious or enlightening, these films certainly have an important place in the genre. Following the old adage, “a picture is worth a thousand words,” a movie can only further illustrate issues not easily explained or provide evidence of an overarching problem. At Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, the “silence breakers” programme features films in which its subjects are drawing attention to topics that require our consideration and demonstrating that there are people trying to instil change. And in a slightly different context, a different political commentary was slipped into the “artscapes” category this year.

Arrest quotas were banned in 2010, yet arrests and summonses still account for more than $900 million of the city’s annual budget. Consequently and not surprisingly, quotas weren’t eliminated — they were just concealed. In response, 12 Black and Latino New York cops filed a class-action lawsuit against the city. They have irrefutable evidence demonstrating their superiors pressure officers into making a minimum of one arrest per day regardless of whether or not a crime has been committed; moreover, they’re directed to target predominantly coloured neighborhoods, often arresting the same 15-25-year-old, jeopardizing their jobs or scholarships, only to have the cases dismissed each time.

Of the police officers taking the stand, there are three at the centre of the film: Sandy Gonzales, who is being publicly humiliated by his colleagues; Edwin Raymond, who can’t get promoted in spite of his impeccable record; and a pregnant Felicia Whitely, who is bullied into pre-term labour. On the other side of the arrests, director Stephen Maing follows a private detective attempting to help those wrongly charged get justice… or in at least one instance, avoid a prison term. Amongst other things, this film demonstrates unprovoked shootings caught on video is just one facet of a systemic problem with racism and culture that needs to be addressed before any improvements will be seen.

Slut or Nut: The Diary of a Rape Trial
Although “rape culture” is not a new phenomenon, it’s finally getting its due attention on account of a number of horrific and high-profile sexual assault cases. For decades, the responsibility for preventing rape has been placed on the would-be target rather than the perpetrator – slut-shaming and victim-blaming are just some of the things women encounter daily. Girls are fed a series of “don’ts” from a young age in order to supposedly protect them from being attacked; meanwhile boys aren’t taught anything about consent. This is gradually changing, but there are many who can’t comprehend the flaw in this logic. These are just some of the obstacles the plaintiff encounters in the documentary, Slut or Nut: The Diary of a Rape Trial.

When Mandi Gray was a PhD student at York University, she was raped by a fellow student with whom she’d gone on a couple of dates. While that experience was traumatizing, her scars would be scored more deeply by the process of trying to convict her rapist. From a school administration that failed to provide recourse to police officers that refused to believe her to limited access to a sexual assault nurse to attempts to discredit her at trial, Gray perseveres with the support of her friends and family — but that doesn’t make her experience any less jarring.

For those already informed about the issue, this documentary doesn’t necessarily contribute anything new to the perception of rape victims. Instead, it provides an enlightening look at the never-ending challenges faced by those who want there to be consequences for their attackers. “Implied consent” is a phrase that gets thrown around a lot, while Gray’s rapist isn’t even mentioned in most of the news stories that dubbed her “the face of rape on campus.” Rather than proposing solutions, director Kelly Showker uses Gray’s case, expert interviews and the reflections of Jane Doe (who is represented by an animated fox) to deliver a detailed account of filing rape charges in Canada.

Yours in Sisterhood
Feminism has been defined and redefined for decades. There are still disputes on what it means to be a feminist, though fairly general and inclusive definitions seem to be the current prevailing versions. In some circles it’s considered a dirty word, while in others it’s deemed a requirement of civil society. Over the years, there have been movements, protests and publications dedicated to feminism and its advancement… and now we live in a world once again being awakened to these issues. So how much has changed? Yours in Sisterhood explores this question through a collection of never-before-shared letters to the editor.

In the ‘70s, Ms. magazine was America’s first mainstream feminist publication. In addition to reading it religiously, it’s readers contributed to the conversation via letters written about their personal experiences and struggles with inequality and independence. But of the correspondence received, only a select few were ever published, leaving the remaining voices tucked away in archival boxes never to be heard. However, filmmaker Irene Lusztig is attempting to remedy that for at least some of the writers by reading their words on camera in her performative, participatory documentary.

Each letter is read by someone in similar circumstances as the original contributor — and in a few cases, the author themselves. Shot in 32 states, participants from across the spectrum of sexual orientation, religious and racial backgrounds, physical ability and political viewpoint read the letters aloud into the camera, then compare their experiences to that of the person who composed the letter 40 years ago in the same location. What becomes fairly obvious is not a lot has changed through the decades and a lot of work still needs to be done. This is a thought-provoking approach to this subject and an effective way of engaging people in conversation about these still relevant topics.

Fish began drawing at a young age and the subjects of his work quickly took on a commentary element. Using his talent to question, oppose or simply ruffle some feathers came naturally to Fish… although his style of humour may not appeal to everyone. His cartoons tend to be vulgar and even offensive to some, though they do achieve the impact he desires. Unfortunately, the decline of print media has left fewer paying jobs for a political cartoonist and he’s grappling against a need to support his family vs. not accepting work he finds unfulfilling.

Via interviews with Fish and his family and friends, director Pablo Bryant paints an intimate portrait of a struggling artist whose talent is needed more than ever even though there are fewer places to display his work. Time spent observing Fish’s wife and their conversations are the most revealing, as she both understands and supports his passion but grows tired of money issues caused by his unstable employment. As Fish’s artwork scrolls across the screen, his skills and style are evident… as is the constrained market in which he must try to stay afloat.

Showtimes and ticket information can be found on the festival website.

Similar Posts

  • Review: What’s ‘Next’ at this year’s Hot Docs (Includes first-hand account)

    By understanding a society’s culture, one can learn a lot about its history and values. The “Next” program at the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival reflects on trends, music and the arts, using one form of creativity to explore other modes of creativity. Focusing on contemporary pop culture and looking back at notable moments, events and figures makes this category one of the festival’s most appealing. This year one film revisits a special television exclusive that saved a struggling network, while another features the surprising top-selling genre in literary fiction.

  • Review: ‘T2 Trainspotting’ is a pitch perfect exercise in nostalgia (Includes first-hand account)

    Nearly twenty years ago, Danny Boyle and John Hogan adapted Irvine Welsh‘s visceral tale about friendship, drug addiction and death. Most of the actors, including Ewan McGregor, Jonny Lee Miller, Robert Carlyle, Ewen Bremner and Kelly Macdonald, would continue to experience varying levels of professional success. But for better or worse, these characters would follow them throughout their careers not only because they were memorable, but because their performances were outstanding. Fans were filled with excitement and trepidation when it was announced Boyle was reuniting the original cast for a sequel; particularly when it was revealed T2 Trainspotting‘s runtime would stretch to 20 minutes over the original, which was deliberately limited to 90 minutes. But it turns out there was absolutely nothing to worry about.

  • Review: Best to watch ‘Bite’ on an empty stomach (Includes first-hand account)

    There are so many things that could go wrong on a vacation, it’s impossible to prepare against everything. But returning home is generally supposed to bring a sigh of relief. Even though it means coming back to the everyday stresses of life, the familiarity of these issues is a comfort. But the bliss of resuming a daily routine can be shattered by the lingering repercussions of any holiday mishaps. In Bite, those consequences are both emotional and physical, and well beyond anything for which anyone could have planned.

  • Review: ‘Super Troopers 2’ doesn’t miss a beat (Includes first-hand account)

    There is something almost timeless about great comedies from the late 20th century. They’re often ill-mannered, politically incorrect and completely over-the-top, but they’re also hilarious. Some recent pictures have come close to capturing the magic, but they’re not quite the same. Where some films are obviously a product of their time and could never be made again, others are simply the perfect combination of script, director, actors and chemistry. Since these combined circumstances are akin to lightening in a bottle, trying to recreate them are incredibly difficult and has failed on many occasions — but that doesn’t stop anyone from trying. The latest movie to get the band back together (almost literally) is Super Troopers 2.

  • Review: ‘The Revenant’ earns accolades by expertly traumatizing audiences (Includes first-hand account)

    Man vs. nature and man vs. man are two of the oldest tales to be told by the campfire as nothing seems to be more pleasing than people’s ability to dominate something or someone else. The root of evil – and most quests – is said to lie in money, sex and power, though the latter is often the most motivating since it can initiate the other two. Vengeance, however, can make one blind to anything else but its fulfillment. Someone truly bent on revenge will stop at nothing to get it, which both gives them strength and makes them weak. In The Revenant, a man returns from near-death to get retribution from his betrayer.