Review: ‘Steve Jobs—The Man in the Machine’ penetrates below the surface (Includes first-hand account)

The path to success is not generally without obstacles, but a person’s manner of dealing with these complications is a good indication of their character. If they exhibit callousness early in their career, there’s little hope their disposition will improve over time; rather it’s more likely that insensitivity will grow in parallel with their accomplishments since it appears to be a verified means to the desired end. The key, however, is to conceal any unpleasant behaviour behind the guise of a liked and respected façade. Documentarian Alex Gibney examines one of the world’s most successful and possibly most misunderstood figures in Steve Jobs: The Man in the Machine.

Starting with the global outpouring of emotion following Steve Jobs‘ passing, Gibney goes back to the beginning to try to understand why people felt so affected by the death of a tech mogul. A young Jobs is shown to have always had an interest in technology, finding camaraderie amongst his fellow nerds including to-be-business-partner Steve Wozniak. Working at Atari is the first-time Jobs demonstrates a significant level of deception that resulted in career advancement. Later he would apply the same ability to persuade others to work towards his vision to turn Apple into a leading and prosperous tech firm. During the years that followed, Jobs’ personal and professional paths would be cluttered with the collateral damage of his success.

Gibney uses interviews with people who knew and worked with Jobs alongside archival footage to paint a picture not often revealed. It’s widely known Jobs refused to acknowledge his first child, but her mother actually speaks about their relationship and the circumstances of their separation with comments from Jobs’ other associates. An engineer integral to the creation of the “personal computer” speaks about the toxic work environment that led to professional triumph and personal downfall. Journalists talk about their experiences with Jobs, from profilers to Gizmodo‘s reporter who was penalized for obtaining an unreleased iPhone. Gibney also interviews Jobs’ spiritual advisor to discover why he never achieved his desire for monkhood.

This documentary isn’t as unkind as it’s been made out to be — perhaps based more on the filmmaker’s previous exposés — but it does feel more complete and honest than some other representations of the Apple co-founder. It demonstrates that he was a shrewd businessman willing to do whatever it took to reach and stay at the top, and who accepted the costs of his success. Yet many of the same people he manipulated still considered him a friend and visionary. He’s shown to be the master of his own image, even constructing an origin story he knew would be better than any that could occur naturally. Using his accessible and consistently effective storytelling style, Gibney avoids undermining Jobs’ achievements but also doesn’t pull any punches when exploring how he accomplished them. And its release just months prior to the debut of Danny Boyle and Aaron Sorkin‘s biopic starring Michael Fassbender as Jobs will make an interesting comparison; not to mention the 2013 overview featuring Ashton Kutcher.

Director: Alex Gibney

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Skyscraper’ is so big it misses out on the details (Includes first-hand account)

    Endangered family members have been a motivating factor for action heroes more than once — it’s one of the many reasons these ties to loved ones are generally considered a weakness and frequently leveraged as such. But it also makes for a great ticking clock narrative in which the protagonist must complete some task by the deadline in order to save them… though the villain’s demands are often ignored in favour of a plan that results in the rescuing of loved ones and the death/apprehension of the bad guy. The latest movie star to take on this role is Dwayne Johnson in Skyscraper.

  • Review: ‘Mary Poppins Returns’ is a heartwarming holiday delight (Includes first-hand account)

    While some movies provide meaningful commentary on the current state of affairs, others are pure escapist films designed to take audiences away from their problems and remind them of the good things in life. The former certainly has value, but sometimes you just want to enjoy watching a picture without having to think too much about it — especially around the holidays. Disney is very good at making these types of movies and this time they’ve reached into their library of classics to revisit a beloved character. The title, Mary Poppins Returns, speaks for itself as everyone could use a little extra care.

  • Review: ‘The Magnificent Seven’ updates the Western for modern audiences (Includes first-hand account)

    The Western is one of the most well-defined film genres, but that also opens it up to some great opportunities for genre-bending narratives. Clint Eastwood was an icon of the Old West movies, yet one of his best pictures turned the genre on its head: High Plains Drifter centred on an anti-hero determined to teach the townspeople as much of a lesson as the hooligans tormenting it. In the same sense, remakes can reimagine the original stories and provide them with different meanings or outcomes that are better suited to contemporary audiences. The 2016 version of The Magnificent Seven makes some changes to the key characters as well as the attitudes of the victims.