Review: ‘Deepwater Horizon’ puts audiences at the centre of the disaster (Includes first-hand account)

There’s frequently more than one side to any story, but that doesn’t mean they’re only conflicting accounts of the same events. In a major incident, there can exist the perspectives of the participants, the observers and then the aftermath. It’s often the latter that gets the most attention or people remember best, but that doesn’t make the other narratives less important; in fact, they can provide a greater understanding of the consequences that eventually moved into focus. In the case of Deepwater Horizon, most people are aware of the biggest oil spill in U.S. history but less familiar with the events that led to the disaster.

In April 2010, BP is trying to setup an oil drill off the coast of Texas, but the project is more than a month behind schedule and the higher ups are becoming anxious… and reckless. Jimmy Harrell (Kurt Russell) leads a team of experts that should have the last word when it comes to the drill’s integrity and the safety of the crew, but BP executives on board the Deepwater Horizon rig believe they know better — in their frugal wisdom, they even dismissed the test crew before they could complete all the required diagnostics. Of course cutting corners has rarely resulted in sounder infrastructure and this instance is no different. Not following protocols and bullying subordinates into complacency leads to the total destruction of the rig, the loss of several lives and an oil disaster that impacted the local environment for years.

Director Peter Berg knows a thing or two about telling a gripping story that combines a compelling narrative and big explosions. He even worked with Mark Wahlberg on his last feature, which was also based on a true story. The added challenge of engaging audiences in this movie is everyone already knows what’s going to happen, so Berg had to find a way to create character connections as well as accurately (?) recreate the terrifying destruction of the rig. The former is accomplished by concentrating viewers’ attention on specific players: Jimmy, drilling engineer Mike Williams (Wahlberg) and his wife (Kate Hudson), flotation specialist Andrea Fleytas (Gina Rodriguez), drill operators Jason Anderson (Ethan Suplee) and Caleb Holloway (Dylan O’Brien), and BP exec Mr. Vidrine (John Malkovich). The catastrophe is then shown through the perspectives of these characters, keeping viewers at the centre of the danger as the external rescue efforts prove inadequate. As the damage rises to irreparable proportions, the only thing that matters is saving as many lives as possible.

Kate Hudson’s new film DWHMovie examines the 2010 oil spill from a lesser-known angle UuOpx6nIHU

— Fallon Tonight (@FallonTonight) September 28, 2016

Berg effectively puts audiences on the Deepwater Horizon as it is torn apart by the pressure of the breach and set ablaze as oil spews from the unsecured hole. He frequently uses an underwater camera to illustrate the stress on the drill and the failure of various safeguard mechanisms. These images unite to generate tangible tension that radiates from the screen and fills the theatre. Audiences sit on the edge of their seats, waiting to see what else could possibly go wrong in this increasingly horrible situation.

The film also had its world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival. Check out the rest of our TIFF 2016 coverage.

Director: Peter Berg
Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Kurt Russell and John Malkovich

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Clapboard Jungle’ goes deep behind the scenes of moviemaking (Includes first-hand account)

    It’s common knowledge the film industry is one of the toughest to penetrate and even more difficult to be successful. Of course, everyone’s measure of success is different, but in this case it can be boiled down to a few basic achievements: making a movie, getting said movie distributed, and people mostly liking it once they’ve been afforded the opportunity to see it. Now the method of all these things occurring is about as varied as the types of pictures people can make. But deep down there’s got to be some similarities; a common thread that drives everyone and bonds them in their pursuit. Clapboard Jungle is an exploration of independent filmmaking and the parallels of creators’ experiences.

  • Review: ‘10 Cloverfield Lane’ harbours many secrets under the surface (Includes first-hand account)

    With the rise of movie franchises, filmgoers have become accustomed to the sequel. In the simplest terms, it’s a new story involving the original characters. More often than not, it’s a continuation or extrapolation of the initial narrative. But that doesn’t mean it has to prescribe to this traditional model. It’s the link between pictures that causes one to be the sequel of another; however, how that link is illustrated or employed is — or should be — flexible. 10 Cloverfield Lane is not a conventional sequel, but it is undoubtedly connected to its predecessor by more than just its name.

  • Review: ‘The Jesus Rolls’ barrels down the fast and loose lane (Includes first-hand account)

    As supplementary characters and supporting artists fill the screen, it’s uncommon for them to become the centre of attention. After all, their role is to help the protagonist(s) propel the story forward, not lead the way. But as actors prepare for these parts, no matter how big or small, it’s possible they create an extensive back story and character arc. Consequently, they may develop an attachment to this personality they nurtured even if their overall contribution to the film is minimal. Twenty-two years ago, John Turturro played an unhinged bowler with a foul-mouth and perfect form. He’s now returned to that character, writing and directing The Jesus Rolls.