A scene from ‘Weapons’

Review: ‘Weapons’ is dangerously creepy

‘Weapons’ explores why a group of children secretly ran out of their houses in the middle of the night, but the answer is far from comforting.

The flipside of survivor’s guilt is other people blaming you for being the only one to remain. Everyone asks questions to which you can’t provide answers. They all expect you to know more because you were among those who didn’t return, but in reality you probably know less than they do as they study the incident from every possible angle. In addition, all the unwanted attention doesn’t allow you the time to process what happened, so in the end no one gets what they need. In Weapons, a mystery takes hold of a small town and the answers are not forthcoming.

One morning, the only people to show up for Justine Gandy’s (Julia Garner) third-grade class are her and Alex Lilly (Cary Christopher). No one knows what happened to the other 17 children, except that they left their homes in the middle of the night and never came back. As the only remaining class members, Justine and Alex are interrogated about the whereabouts of the missing kids. While the boy is cleared of any involvement, everyone is convinced the teacher must be involved since it only affected her classroom. The police have no leads after a month-long investigation, so some concerned citizens take it upon themselves to uncover the truth.

Writer-director Zach Cregger likes a mystery with no straight answer. His previous film, Barbarian, began with someone becoming accidentally trapped in a basement and grew increasingly unsettling. This time, the gist of the thriller is described in the movie’s tagline, so it’s not surprising it opens with the events leading up to the near empty classroom. What follows is a series of character vignettes that weave together and eventually answer the question, “How did we get here?” Cregger’s skill is demonstrated in how each chapter unfolds, avoiding repetition and cleverly overlapping so they lead into each other and build out the bigger picture.

The narrative is driven by the characters who didn’t stop trying to unravel the mystery. Their unauthorized investigation gives audiences the pieces they need to solve the puzzle. However, even once the cause is discovered, there’s still quite a bit of story to tell. There’s a sinister atmosphere that intensifies as stranger things keep happening and the tale becomes increasingly creepier. Consequently, the answer to what happened to the children provides little comfort when it finally is revealed.

The film has a dark sense of humour, unexpectedly sprinkling laughter in between the horror. There are some chilling build ups to several jump scares and an overall eerie feeling that’s impossible to shake. Yet, there’s also some genuinely funny moments that arise from the characters being realistic. Everyone involved delivers a top-notch performance, portraying fully developed personalities that are being driven to the edge of madness by the situation.

Justine is already flawed, and Garner finds the right balance between well-meaning and reckless as she tries to deal with the pressure of being the town’s no. 1 suspect. Josh Brolin portrays a father consumed by his son’s disappearance and obsessed with the idea that Justine knows what happened. Christopher is at the heart of the story, being the only kid not to run away and convincingly wearing Alex’s burden throughout the picture. Alden Ehrenreich and Benedict Wong play supporting yet vital roles in uncovering the clues to the mystery, each warranting their own chapter in the story. And Amy Madigan turns in a big character performance with a hairstyle that defies Superman’s Guy Gardner’s cut.

Cregger continues to prove he’s not afraid to do the unexpected in a film, nor does he shy away from blood and gore, combining to produce another gripping and sometimes horrifying picture from the filmmaker.

Director: Zach Cregger
Starring: Julia Garner, Josh Brolin and Alden Ehrenreich

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Hateful Eight’ takes its unique Western on the road (Includes first-hand account)

    Before brick and mortar cinemas became popular, movies and their projectionists used to travel from town to town like the circus. Going to see a film was a special event rather than something to do when you’re bored. This tradition of distinction was renewed with the creation of large-scale productions and the allure of movie stars. Moreover, people didn’t sit in the dark for three-plus hours without a bathroom, snack or cigarette break so they were built into the screening. These are the experiences writer/director Quentin Tarantino is attempting to replicate with the 70 mm roadshow version of The Hateful Eight.

  • Review: ‘The Dark Tower’ is on another path (Includes first-hand account)

    For as long as filmmakers have been adapting books for the screen, there have been a number of works deemed not filmable either due to their length, complexity or demands on the imagination. Then a visionary arrives who sees a way, often through modern techniques, to achieve the impossible. There have been many instances in which the ability to do something has not equated to the ability to do it well, but we still award these creators an A+ for effort. Of course sometimes the answer is to simply do it differently. More than a decade after the last book in the series was written, The Dark Tower is making its big screen debut.

  • Review: ‘Bridge of Spies’ is a stirring but welcome crossing (Includes first-hand account)

    Regardless of one’s opinions of Steven Spielberg or Tom Hanks, when the two come together to make a film there’s generally little doubt that it will be good. The topics of their collaborations have varied over the years from the war to immigration to a clever criminal. In Bridge of Spies, they add espionage to the list, though the actor thankfully is not the one sneaking around stealing government secrets.

  • Review: ‘I Smile Back’ is Sarah Silverman’s sincere portrait of addiction (Includes first-hand account)

    Without the proper coping mechanisms, life’s pressures can be overwhelming. Self- and society-imposed expectations are sometimes not only challenging but impossible to achieve. Mothers often feel this the most as everyone seems to have an opinion about what makes a good mom, providing varied and conflicting advice that can be enough to drive any parent to the edge. In I Smile Back, a woman who desires nothing more than to be a good wife and mother cannot overcome her self-destructive tendencies.