A scene from ‘Anatomy of a Fall’

TIFF ’23 Review: ‘Anatomy of a Fall’ breaks a marriage down to its worst moments

‘Anatomy of a Fall’ is a ruthless court procedural that scrutinizes every aspect of a woman’s life when she’s accused of killing her husband.

Sandra (Sandra Hüller), Samuel (Samuel Theis) and their visually-impaired son Daniel (Milo Machado Graner) moved to a secluded house in France not long ago. She’s a successful writer and he’s a professor — a literary power couple on paper. One day, Daniel returns from taking his dog on a winter walk to find his father’s body lying in the snow at the side of the house. He screams for his mother who calls emergency services, but it was too late — Samuel was dead. But how did he die? Was he pushed from the balcony? Did he jump out the window? With an inconclusive autopsy, it’s up to the court to decide if Sandra murdered her husband, while their son learns all the gritty details of their imperfect marriage.

Every transgression, rumour or work of fiction the prosecutors deem relevant is submitted for consideration. Regardless of whether viewers think Sandra is guilty or not, it’s tough not to sympathise as they analyze intimate details of her life with Samuel and she’s forced to defend things that would normally go undetected or be forgotten. Consequently, watching the case unfold is emotionally trying as one can only imagine being put in a position to defend words said in the heat of the moment or refute subjective accounts of your personality and actions. As the only other witness, Daniel becomes a participant in the trial, though it’s interesting to watch them walk a tight rope during his questioning.

Setup as a courtroom drama, audiences will become engrossed in the intense trial as Sandra’s personality awaits a verdict.

Anatomy of a Fall had its Canadian premiere in the Special Presentations programme at the Toronto International Film Festival.

Read other reviews from the festival.

Director: Justine Triet
Starring: Sandra Hüller, Swann Arlaud and Milo Machado Graner

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘In the Heart of the Sea’ stays afloat via its visual drama (Includes first-hand account)

    There are different types of skill, some of which are inherent or inherited and others that are learned or improved via practice. However the idea that these should be judged differently or affect the quality of the product generated is absurd. If anything, those who are forced to work harder may be more humble about their talents than those for whom they came naturally. It’s this type of meaningless distinction that divides the main characters in In the Heart of the Sea.

  • Review: ‘The Invisible Man’ lives in that unshakeable, unsettling feeling (Includes first-hand account)

    Everyone knows the feeling that someone is watching you… even though you know you’re alone. Or something moves from the location you’re absolutely positive you left it a moment ago. Most people just chalk it up to their mind playing tricks on them. But what if you had reason to believe it’s not just your imagination, but in fact someone else playing a sinister game? A game that causes you to stop trusting yourself and makes other people think you’ve lost your mind? The Invisible Man is doing just that and it’s working dangerously well.

  • Review: ‘Broken Mile’ is literally a non-stop thriller (Includes first-hand account)

    One of the side effects of being an addict is you can’t always remember what happened while you were under the influence. Sobering can raise a lot of questions related to where you are, who you’re with and what transpired that led to current circumstances. Unfortunately, depending on the company you keep during these sessions, they may not be able to provide any answers. The resulting confusion is bewildering and occasionally dangerous as in Broken Mile, when one character awakens to the worst possible discovery.

  • Review: ‘Rampage’ delivers on its promise — no more or less (Includes first-hand account)

    There is something very entertaining about watching giant monsters tear apart famous cities. Whether stop-motion creatures or CGI beasts, it’s often difficult — or even unintuitive — to root for the armed forces attempting to bring them down; this is particularly true when the creature has the potential to be cured/rehabilitated/relocated… alive. Often agitated at no fault of their own, the misunderstood beast acts out destructively. On the other hand, choosing sides in a winner takes all battle between two or more monsters is far easier. Such are the dilemmas faced when watching Rampage.