A scene from ‘Joker: Folie à Deux’

Review: ‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ deliberately and mistakenly loses focus

‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ combines the title character’s murder trial with a poorly concocted musical.

There are videos and writings in which psychologists and psychiatrists attempt to analyze and diagnose comic book characters’ mental wellness. It’s not surprising many of these heroes and villains have some form of disorder or psychosis that is often more complex than just being a psychopath or narcissist. Yet, most of the stories focus on good vs. evil, ignoring the reasons they do what the do as their actions outweigh the need to understand. But Joker: Folie à Deux is consumed with why the title character is the way he is, examining the effects of his past and mental health on his behaviour.

Following the events of the first film, including the live execution of TV talk show host, Murray Franklin (Robert De Niro), Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix), a.k.a. Joker, is now an inmate at Arkham Asylum. His defense attorney (Catherine Keener) is determined to convince a jury that he suffers from multiple personality disorder (now known as dissociative identity disorder), caused by a traumatic childhood and triggered by a violent altercation. In opposition, Assistant District Attorney Harvey Dent (Harry Lawtey) plans to prove Arthur was fully aware of his actions. And Arthur is just going with the flow — until he meets Lee, a.k.a. Harley Quinzel (Lady Gaga), an Arkham patient obsessed with the Joker. Suddenly, Arthur has a reason to live and embrace his alter ego’s swagger.

Once again, writer-director Todd Phillips takes an unconventional approach to the DC characters, while still sprinkling canon throughout the narrative. From Lee’s background and subtle costumes to Thomas Wayne’s television appearances, from Arkham Asylum to Gotham city, it’s clear the film is unfolding in the DC universe, even if it’s not a typical comic book movie. Most of the picture unfolds within the confines of Arkham and the courtroom, largely limiting the audience’s perspective to Arthur’s experiences, which is challenging since fantasy and reality frequently intersect.

Arthur always daydreamed to escape the dreariness of his life, imagining a successful stand-up career or a thoughtful girlfriend (Zazie Beetz). This film takes it a step further as now Arthur fantasizes in musicals. Whether real or imaginary, he sings, dances and even taps. Sometimes it’s on stage, in front of an audience, and other times he performs within the walls of Arkham Asylum. However, this turn of events even better explains Lady Gaga’s casting in the role of Harley, as the pair have several duets and harmonize well together. The songs are mostly from the 1950s and ‘60s, including “That’s Life,” “Get Happy,” “If My Friends Could See Me Now” and several reprisals of “Gonna Build a Mountain.”

However, all these efforts to be unconventional and further push the boundaries of comic book movies produce a haphazard and repetitive picture with too many musical interludes and the most unexciting approach to two of comic’s most fascinating personalities. Phoenix’s Arthur is weak and unfunny, while Joker is overdramatic and overwhelmed by love. Similarly, Lady Gaga’s performance is tempered with brief bursts of irrationality, fuelled by her fixation with Joker’s chaotic behaviour. She becomes the star of Arthur’s fantasies, which are vibrant but superficial, unnecessarily padding the film’s inflated runtime. Better titled, “Joker: Trial of the Century,” the movie would have also been improved if it reigned in its focus.

Director: Todd Phillips
Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Lady Gaga and Brendan Gleeson

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Divergent Series’ sacrifices ‘Allegiant’ for the big picture (Includes first-hand account)

    Movie franchises based on a collection of books are often akin to a big-budget television miniseries in that all of the parts come together to comprise the whole. The ending of one film informs the beginning of the next and removing an episode throws the whole narrative into disarray (in the good series anyway). The key difference is successive parts are released annually rather than weekly, extending the wait between significant plot developments. The downside of this structure in movies is the penultimate chapter is often positioned as little more than a setup for the epic conclusion. The Divergent Series: Allegiant is the third picture in a four-part series.

  • Review: ‘The Aftermath’ discovers a fine line between love and hate (Includes first-hand account)

    There are many things that can put a strain on a relationship. While it may be able to endure one stressor, more than that can cause irreparable damage and forcibly sever even the strongest bond. Examples of these burdens include death, war, distance, betrayal and blame — any one of which can create a rift that is widened with each additional problem. Perhaps most unfortunately, people can begin to drift without even realizing it’s happening until it’s too late and there’s nothing left but unsalvageable remains. The Aftermath takes place following several devastating events, the most significant being World War II.

  • Review: TIFF retrospective screens Maurice Pialat’s most successful film (Includes first-hand account)

    French cinema is historically a source of visceral narratives that don’t shy away from provocative subjects. Although director Maurice Pialat struck out at and from his contemporaries, the former painter was undoubtedly a product of the zeitgeist. His fascination with sexuality, Parisian families and tyrannical male figures underlies most of his work and is a reflection of many other French filmmakers; while his realist approach has often been compared to John Cassavetes. The TIFF retrospective, “Love Exists: The Films of Maurice Pialat,” demonstrates the many ways Pialat tackled these subjects in his films, though his most successful would be À nos amours.