A scene from 'Roofman'

Roofman review: Being good-natured doesn’t mean making good decisions

‘Roofman’ is the strange but true story of an escaped convict that found love while hiding out in a toy store.

Struggling to make ends meet is not unique to any type of person, culture or country. People need money to survive. Not having enough of it means making difficult decisions and possibly going without something. This can be most challenging when children are involved since it’s harder for them to understand or accept. Kids are also one of the key motivations for doing something you might not even consider otherwise. Failing to provide for his offspring is the primary reason a veteran turned to armed robbery in Roofman.

Jeff Manchester (Channing Tatum) served in the armed forces, but hasn’t held a full-time job since coming home. Still, he wants nothing more than to prove he can be a provider. After yet another disappointment, he decides it’s time to earn money by any means necessary. Jeff is a skilled observer, which makes him an excellent thief. Breaking into McDonald’s roofs, he politely robs the staff without hurting anyone. However, his lack of criminal know-how leads to his inevitable arrest. Nevertheless, Jeff eventually uses his unique abilities to break out of prison and take up residence in a Toys”R”Us store.

If Jeff — and Tatum’s portrayal of him — wasn’t so charming, this story would be incredibly creepy. The escaped convict builds a makeshift home in one of the toy store’s displays. He sleeps during the day among unaware shoppers and plunders the shelves at night.

Growing bored of his lonely escapades, Jeff sets up cameras to spy on the employees. He engages with the video like it’s a TV show. There’s a villain (the curmudgeonly store manager played by Peter Dinklage), an underdog (the spineless stock person played by Emory Cohen) and a love interest (single-mother Leigh, played by Kirsten Dunst). The key difference is Jeff can and does interfere with the storyline, particularly when the manager mistreats the staff.

Jeff narrates the story, providing candid insights into his choices. He describes why his unconventional tactics work, while also explaining his ultra-poor decisions. It adds another layer of humour to the bizarre saga and connects audiences more deeply to the main character.

Overall, this is an enjoyable picture that provides Tatum an opportunity to combine his goofy and dramatic sides. Leigh represents Jeff’s second chance at life. But her religious interests and his living a lie don’t amount to the highest compatibility score. Nonetheless, the extended middle part of this narrative is a love story.

Co-writer and director Derek Cianfrance is usually behind edgier romances. Unfortunately, the film’s attempts to align with the real-life events on which it’s based results in too many details and too long of a movie. It would have been better without the lull in the middle as audiences chaperone too many of Jeff and Leigh’s dates. This is one of those rare instances where a montage may have been more appropriate. After all, watching Jeff’s out-of-the-box methods to avoid detection are way more interesting than watching two people fall in love.

Director: Derek Cianfrance
Starring: Channing Tatum, Kirsten Dunst and LaKeith Stanfield

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Jungle Book’ is a remake with stunning purpose (Includes first-hand account)

    The act of longstanding studios poaching their own catalogues and cannibalizing their own work has become a matter of course over the years. Remakes have become the norm rather than the exception, which demands new questions around the validity of such work. Does this new version serve a purpose or is it simply the result of a lack of ideas? Disney is the latest to adopt this cycle, adapting their animated classics into live-action features. However, it’s also been an interesting exercise of how to translate fantastic narratives from one medium into another as the hand-drawn world has far fewer restrictions than the tangible one. The Jungle Book presents a significant challenge in this area that also offers significant payoff.

  • Review: ‘Captain America: Civil War’ delivers on the big things (Includes first-hand account)

    Even though the team found a way to put their differences aside, cracks in The Avengers‘ armour began to show in the last ensemble film. Superheroes no longer exist in a world in which there are no consequences for their actions — Batman v Superman recently dealt with similar themes. But who gets to decide when and where they’re deployed? And if they disagree, whose decision has greater authority? There’s a fine line between regulation and control; and while one may appear essential to co-existence, the other is a significant and probable risk. Captain America: Civil War addresses these questions, dividing The Avengers into opposing factions.