A scene from 'Scream 7'

Scream 7 review: An homage that forgets to tell its own story well

‘Scream 7’ is the latest franchise sequel, returning to its roots on both sides of the camera with mixed results.

The original Scream film was a gamechanger. Wes Craven delivered a meta slasher movie that took years of character tropes and analysis, and told audiences exactly what to look for. They never broke the fourth wall, but they were speaking directly to genre fans. The first two sequels tried to continue the thread, but each new film fell a little below the bar. Later attempts to reboot the franchise could never live up to the 1996 gold standard. So now, Scream 7 is taking it all back to the beginning.

Sidney Prescott-Evans (Neve Campbell) hides in plain sight in a small town. She’s married to Mark Evans (Joel McHale), the local police chief. Their daughter, Tatum (Isabel May), is now the same age she was when she survived her first serial killers. Everyone knows who Sidney is and the Stab movies are as popular as ever. But she still refuses to talk about what happened, even when Tatum asks questions. When the murders start again, Sidney knows exactly what they need to do — run. But shielding Tatum from her past has only made her more wary of her mother’s decisions. So, when nothing goes to plan, the only thing left to do is stay and fight.

The film has a lot of links to the original Scream, from Tatum’s name to the murder house tour, to the many quotes cited by various characters. There are also a few nods to the second film, including a distinct piece of clothing and strategically placed Tori Spelling poster. Co-writer and director Kevin Williamson’s nostalgia for working with Craven radiates through these homages to the story’s origins. It’s also a fun Easter egg hunt for franchise fans as they wade through the many winks and more obvious tributes to the film’s precursors.

Since pulling a Hitchcock and killing the marquee star in Scream’s opening scene, each movie’s beginning is its strongest. This one is no different. The film starts with an acknowledgement of diehard fans who can quote the films and recite obscure trivia. But Ghostface is not playing around in this installment and they don’t give special treatment to anyone. The gateway to reach their soon-to-be victims is obvious, which only builds the anticipation before the bloodshed begins. This masked killer is aggressive and especially brutal compared to some of their predecessors, which makes them a little edgier.

There are some excellent kills in this movie. It unfortunately falls back on an old slasher trope in which the killer toys with and chases around the young women before viciously slaughtering them. However, most of them are fighters, so they get some good hits in on their attacker before inevitably succumbing. On the other hand, Ghostface executes the young men quickly without any fuss and occasionally even dispatches them off screen. Excitingly, there are two unconventional kills that will catch the attention of horror fans, including one inspired practical effect.

The film uses a clever device to reunite some of the original cast, while also making the story relevant in a society grappling with the advancement of A.I. It’s a reminder of how far we’ve come since the 1990s when Ghostface only relied on a voice disguiser to conceal their identity. To that end, the films have used a lot of red herrings over the years to mislead viewers about the killer’s true identity. This latest sequel leverages these distractions to keep viewers on their toes, staying true to the franchise motto, “everyone’s a suspect.”

Unfortunately, it’s pretty easy to determine who the killer is in this picture. In fact, as soon as they’re introduced, many viewers will make the connection. This speaks to the sub-standard script quality, which particularly falls apart in the third act. Throughout the film, characters do numerous senseless things. But at least they’re likeable — a testament to the great cast — so it’s mostly tolerable. Conversely, the scenes leading up to the final standoff requires an irrational suspension of belief to make it appear remotely possible, resulting in unintentional laughter.

As Stu Macher and Billy Loomis established, you need to have a motive. But that is just another of the film’s failings. This movie’s Ghostface has a pretty thin reason for their killing spree. It’s a stretch at best and it’s not interesting or believable. 

All of this is exasperated by the number of times a character repeats “shoot him in the head,” making it almost feel like audiences are watching a zombie movie rather than a slasher.

Director: Kevin Williamson
Starring: Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox and Isabel May

Similar Posts

  • Review: Hot Docs provides new perspectives on familiar subjects (Includes first-hand account)

    Anyone looking for a film festival’s top offerings need to look no further than its “Special Presentations” section. At the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, organizers collect all the films with high profile directors and/or subjects here with 34 selections this year. From celebrities from all walks of life to controversial issues to prolific documentary filmmakers, this programme has it all. We look at three films from this category: Lo and Behold: Reveries of the Connected World, My Scientology Movie and Trapped.

  • Review: ‘Hell or High Water’ blends tradition with contemporary drama (Includes first-hand account)

    No matter what people say, sometimes defining right and wrong is a tricky business. The differences aren’t as clear as black and white nearly as much as people would like. Moreover, the answers can change depending on who you ask and/or on what side of the debate their interests lie. What one person may view as an offense, the other sees as justified retribution. But these gray areas are often the most interesting to explore, particularly in the realm of fiction. In Hell or High Water, the main characters definitely have a difference of opinion when it comes to the legitimacy of their actions.

  • Review: ‘Mojave’ has a thirst for murder (Includes first-hand account)

    Based on examples through history, the unscientific theory suggests the greater the artist, the more tortured the soul. Similarly, in many cases, fame and fortune opens the door and rolls out the red carpet for sex and drugs. These burdens, combined with the pressure to keep producing works of genius while being scrutinized by the public, can be overwhelming for anyone. But how a person chooses to deal with these issues can define and redefine their path. In Mojave, a prominent playwright hopes to escape into the desert but finds an even bigger problem waiting for him.

  • Review: ‘Kong: Skull Island’ gives the king due respect (Includes first-hand account)

    Before CGI and other technologies existed, filmmakers still sought ways to make the monsters of their imaginations a reality on the big screen. Thus, early creature-based narratives, such as King Kong and Clash of the Titans, were created using stop-motion animation and, later, animatronics were used. Obviously there were limitations to what was possible, particularly regarding the design’s interaction with the actors and sets, but they accomplished a lot with what they had at the time. However, technological advancements have all but made this practical art form archaic. Now that it seems simpler to make these types of movies, many of them have been made again (and in some cases, again and again). Kong: Skull Island is the latest depiction of the colossal ape that first captured audience’s attentions in 1933.