A scene from 'Hoppers'

Hoppers review: These animals have personality

‘Hoppers’ is a dream come true for an animal activist who finally gets her wish to live amongst the wildlife she vows to protect.

At some point in their lives, most animal lovers wish they could understand their furry or scaly friends. That doesn’t stop people from talking to their pets or wild animals. But they know they won’t receive a comprehensible response in return. This inability to communicate leads to humans anthropomorphizing animals, assigning them the voices and thoughts they think they may have. This creative solution appears in images, videos and writing across all genres. It’s all in good fun since we’ll never know how accurate it is. But in Hoppers, researchers find a not-so-unique, scientific solution to learn the truth.

Mabel (Piper Curda) finds peace in nature that she can’t achieve anywhere else. But anyone who threatens her landscape must face her wrath. Consequently, she frequently butts heads with Mayor Jerry (Jon Hamm) on environmental issues. Now that he wants to build a bridge through her treasured glen, it’s war. While trying to find a way to stop the construction, Mabel stumbles on a secret experiment. A science professor (Kathy Najimy) has found a way to transfer people’s minds into realistic, robotic animals so they can live amongst the wildlife. Now, Mabel hopes she can leverage their technology to convince the animals to help her save the glen.

If the basis of the equipment sounds familiar, that’s because it’s very similar to the technology used in the Avatar franchise. Only this time, they’re possessing non-descript wild animals rather than imitations of an alien species. Yet, the science seems a bit sketchy. They show a series of mechanical prototypes that trace the evolution of the avatars. They also provide a comically high-level explanation of how it works with a handful of words and gestures. However, it’s unclear how they are able to communicate with the animals simply by looking like they belong. Viewers will need to ignore this detail to allow the story to progress, but the humour is a pretty good distraction.

As the creator of We Bare Bears, co-writer and director Daniel Chong knows something about endearing animals. One of the film’s more fascinating elements is the clear but quiet differences between the animals’ appearances depending on whose perspective they’re seen through. When using the avatar and living amongst the wildlife, the creatures’ looks reflect their individuality. Even though many of them have big personalities, the visual traits make it easier to tell them apart. From communicative eyes to dramatic facial expressions to distinct hairstyles, the animated mammals are exceptional. Conversely, to the humans who can’t understand them, all the animals look alike because they can’t perceive their unique dispositions.

King George (Bobby Moynihan) is a charismatic beaver who is positive to a fault. He sees the good in everyone and does his best to create a community in which everyone is welcome. Though the rules may seem a bit counter-intuitive. Nonetheless, he immediately welcomes Mabel into their society and begins to see her as a confidante. More surprising is Diane (Vanessa Bayer), the great white shark. She lives up to her reputation of being super nice, even when she’s being flown across land by a flock of seagulls. It’s amusing to watch an apex predator be exceedingly polite while on the verge of literally biting someone’s head off.

Though it may not play for the younger crowd, older audience members will recognize a clever Game of Thrones reference. When George appoints a “Paw,” it alludes to one of the most revered and coveted positions in the series — the Hand, advisor to the king. The animal council has a similar vibe to the Table in John Wick. Each class of animal is represented by a king or queen who deliberate big issues that expand beyond one location or species. In extreme cases, they may even recommend a “squish.” To this end, there’s a surprising turn of events when the animals turn out to be more cunning than expected.

The film begins with the heartwarming story of an animal lover trying to liberate her school’s classroom pets — and with good reason based on how the children treat them. This love of nature creates a beautiful bond between Mabel and her Grandma Tanaka (Karen Huie). She introduces Mabel to nature’s calmness at the now-threatened glen. Meanwhile, Mayor Jerry is the stereotypical, money-hungry villain. He predictably does dishonest things that will harm the environment in the name of his latest business venture’s success.

For an animated movie, the narrative deals with a lot of different issues. Most obvious is the environmental protection theme, which illustrates why it’s important to safeguard green spaces. But it also addresses smaller, relatable problems, including bonding with elderly family members, coping with big feelings and how reacting emotionally to a situation can have negative consequences.

The film is enjoyable for audiences of all ages. Hopefully, very young viewers take to heart the message about appreciating nature and tranquility it can offer. After all, the children are our future.

Director: Daniel Chong
Starring: Piper Curda, Bobby Moynihan and Jon Hamm

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Martian’ is not just realistic from NASA’s perspective (Includes first-hand account)

    Space has truly become the next frontier of movies. However it’s no longer the comedic fantasy dramas that dominated the genre previously. Now filmmakers are utilizing technology to create credible narratives with a basis in real science. It seems every year now film-going audiences are treated to a larger-than-life portrayal of the universe that boasts unparalleled visuals and excellent writing. Director Ridley Scott returns to the depths of space and science fiction for his latest tale, The Martian.

  • Review: ‘The Editor’ is a stylish homage to giallo cinema (Includes first-hand account)

    There’s a fine line between imitation and inspiration, but the distinction is irrelevant if the project is executed with care. Admiring someone else’s style or talent and aspiring to replicate a fraction of their success is a worthwhile endeavour. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery after all. In film, homages and references are common as masters of cinema set the standard for techniques and aesthetics in particular genres. The team at Astron-6 has made a name for themselves embracing formerly popular movie types and The Editor is their latest project, recalling giallo cinema.

  • Review: ‘Godzilla: King of the Monsters’ is a problematic ruler (Includes first-hand account)

    Since being introduced by Toho in 1954, Kaiju have fascinated movie audiences with their sheer enormity and devastating destructive abilities. Then they took it up a notch by shifting the beasts’ focus to each other as the giant creatures battle for supremacy while still obliterating everything in their paths. With dozens of pictures in their catalogue and fans all over the world, they’d essentially created a genre. Now, as Hollywood continues to reach back in time for inspiration, they’ve decided to reboot the stories and rebuild the world of “titans.” In Godzilla: King of the Monsters, the giant reptile is in hiding but the government would prefer him dead.

  • Review: ‘Jurassic World’ forgot to cultivate its entire realm (Includes first-hand account)

    Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park was a monumental release. Based on the book of the same name by Michael Crichton, the pair created an epic action-adventure-science-fiction picture that wowed audiences with its incredible special effects and grand story concept. For those two hours in 1993, dinosaurs became real. Now more than 20 years later, Hollywood has once again decided to reach back in time for its latest movie idea, recreating the fantastic park for a new generation. However Jurassic World may impress audiences fresh to the series, but fans of the original franchise will likely be less dazzled.

  • Review: ‘Tangerine’ is about more than a commonplace camera (Includes first-hand account)

    There was a trend in ‘90s and early 2000s cinema to build narratives around provocative characters without a specific or traditional story attached. The film simply chronicled a day in their lives in which they were forced to manage a certain uncommon situation or as they went about their daily routine, introducing viewers to other fascinating personalities and lifestyles. They often unfolded amongst society’s disadvantaged, and were the bread-and-butter of indie filmmakers. Tangerine revisits this story structure with style and energy while being shot entirely on the iPhone 5S.