A scene from 'Ready or Not 2: Here I Come'

Ready or Not 2: Here I Come review: It’s not all fun and games

‘Ready or Not 2: Here I Come’ puts its final girl back in the game as she’s forced to survive another round of hide and seek.

Meeting the in-laws can be nerve-wracking. There’s always the worry that if they form a negative opinion, it could affect your partner’s feelings for you. But it’s potential heartbreak that fuels that anxiety. Concern that this new family could be the one to hurt you never occurs to most people. That’s what catches the main character in Ready or Not off guard when she spends her wedding night hiding from her husband’s relatives so they can’t sacrifice her to the Devil. But she survives and they pay the piper for their failure. Only now, it’s starting all over again in Ready or Not 2: Here I Come.

Grace (Samara Weaving) made it to sunrise, outlasting her hunters and winning the game. Now she’s in the hospital, in police custody and there’s no way they’ll believe her story. But her estranged sister, Faith (Kathryn Newton), might — especially when there’s another assassination attempt before Grace is even discharged. It turns out her survival activated another of Mr. Le Bail’s clauses. The Le Domas family was not the only house who made a deal with the Devil. Now, there’s a power vacuum and they must play another game to decide who will sit in the high seat. So, Grace will be hunted again, but this time she’ll have her sister at her side.

The sequel picks up at the end of the previous film. It replays the final minute then continues the scene with Grace’s perfect response to the officer. The existence of a larger cabal of Devil worshippers is not shocking. Nor is it surprising that they’d be affected by the loss of one of the sect’s great families. However, it is curious that their interest in Grace is not revenge, but something that is once again not at all personal. It’s simply still a case of wrong family, wrong card.

In addition to a previously unknown sister, a new cabal means a whole new cast. They include acclaimed filmmaker David Cronenberg, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Shawn Hatosy, Kevin Durand, Olivia Cheng, Néstor Carbonell, Maia Jae, Varun Saranga and Elijah Wood. Where Durand lumbers around like a murderous gorilla on coke, Gellar repurposes some of her slayer skills, including a classic staking.

More so than in the previous movie, this picture portrays the elites as a bunch of greedy, sadistic idiots. Some of them try to distance themselves from the task by calling the sisters things, while others revel in the opportunity to hunt and murder. But the increased attempts to villainize the cabal and make them all appear too incompetent to wield such power is heavy handed. The first film’s reliance on organic proof of their ridiculousness was more effective. The comparisons to the Trump children only underline this departure from the less ambiguous but more disturbing depiction of the entitled rich.

The consolation is their foolhardy greed results in a lot more people exploding. Though Weaving and Newton were likely less enthusiastic about repeatedly facing the blood cannons for our amusement, even if it is consistently funny. It turns out Mr. Le Bail is very particular and requires everyone strictly abide by the rules. Consequently, the rule book in nearly a foot thick, accounting for almost every situation. The extent of the regulations makes his lawyer’s (Wood) knowledge of each statute all the more impressive. Perhaps the only thing more extraordinary is his ability to regularly avoid all the blood splatter.

One of the rules that carry over from the first film is they may only use weapons that existed when their ancestors made their families’ deals. This produces an interesting range of arms and quickly identifies the “new money” amongst them. The fights range from silly sight gags to extreme acts of violence. But there’s a particularly conflicting section that gives rise to some troubling feelings. Two scenes unfold in parallel — a laughable bout of fisticuffs and an appalling display of brutality — and its difficult to continually switch between amusement and horror.

In spite of some predictability, the film delivers a comical comeuppance fitting of the franchise. Even though a deleted post-credit scene planted the seed for this narrative, it took six years to come to fruition. It will be interesting to see if they find a way to continue the story once again.

Directors: Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett
Starring: Samara Weaving, Kathryn Newton and Elijah Wood

Similar Posts

  • Review: TIFF 2020: ‘The Father’ is devastatingly authentic (capsule) (Includes first-hand account)

    The Father puts viewers in the shoes of Anthony (Sir Anthony Hopkins), an affluent retiree entering the late stages of dementia. Unwilling to admit he needs assistance, he’s rudely run-off several caregivers hired by his daughter, Anne (Olivia Colman). In the meantime, Anthony wanders around in his pyjamas more frequently, fails to recognize his family or his surroundings, and loses track in the midst of basic tasks.

  • Review: ‘Beyond the Reach’ is grasping for solid ground

    There was a time when hunting wild game was a necessity of survival. Before grocery stores and butcher shops, people were required to kill animals in order to put food on the table. However, it’s since become an activity performed primarily for sport and amusement. Certain personalities are more inclined to find such a hobby entertaining; but there is also a certain category of these people you would not want to cross. In Beyond the Reach, a fatal mistake turns the hunter into the prey.

  • Review: ‘Maudie’ paints a complex but fulfilling picture (Includes first-hand account)

    There have been a number of movies based around characters who are underestimated or overlooked because they have a particular mental or physical challenge; frequently the person is faking a debility specifically for this purpose, but other times it’s real even though their abilities have been misjudged. More often than not, it’s outsiders who recognize their aptitude for something before those closest to them even notice. In Maudie, the main character’s talents are acknowledged by strangers and most of the world before her own family accepts she has any.

  • Review: ‘Halloween’ erases a franchise and has no regrets (Includes first-hand account)

    Sequel, prequel, remake, reboot, reimagining. All of these words mean the current rendition stems from something that came before it, which consequently means it’s not original — though it could have a unique approach. Styles and methods of making films in these categories widely differ as does their quality and acceptance. While there are likely too many of these pictures regularly hitting cinemas, some of them rise above the din by making a notable impression on audiences. Fortunately, the latest franchise installment, Halloween, does all the right things in all the right ways to climb out of October horror obscurity.

  • Review: ‘Fifty Shades Freed’ should’ve stayed bound and gagged (Includes first-hand account)

    The ultimate chapter in a trilogy dubbed the “anti-Twilight,” which titillated any reader who could tolerate E.L. James’ abysmal prose, is finally getting its big screen debut. Over three years, the controversial yet sultry adaptations of Anastasia Steele’s unsolicited sexual awakening and subsequent taming of the bully Christian Grey has unfolded in the shadow of jealous lovers, past and present. In spite of being made under the guidance of different directors and screenwriters, a lack of consistency was never going to be the series’ biggest problem as Fifty Shades Freed so plainly demonstrates.