A scene from 'Leviticus'

Leviticus review: When queer desire becomes the monster

‘Leviticus’ turns love into a weapon by forcing gay teenagers to evade a killer that wears the face of their crush.

Many parents dread the day their child starts dating. They feel anxious about all the things that could go wrong, not the least of which is disapproving of their kid’s romantic interest. While it seems like something that should be out of their hands, some families can’t help interfering. Everyone has heard stories (or seen reality shows) about the extreme measures people go to keep their son or daughter from dating someone — or anyone. In Leviticus, a small religious community relies on supernatural deterrents to suppress unfavourable sexual desires.

Naim (Joe Bird) isn’t making many friends at his new school, so he’s flattered when another boy in his class invites him to hang out. Ryan (Stacy Clausen) is attractive and a bit of an outcast. It’s not long before their roughhousing takes a more intimate turn. But same-sex relationships are more than discouraged in this town. The local parents have a cure for their “misled” and “confused” teens. The ritual is like an exorcism. But the kids soon discover the ceremony doesn’t rid them of their demons. Instead, it summons an evil that will use their desires against them like some lethal form of conversion therapy.

Punishing teenagers for following their sexual impulses is a classic horror trope. It’s no secret that having sex in a slasher movie is almost always a death sentence. There’s no greater sin in the genre. However, this film specifically targets queer teens. A fact underlined by the lack of concern around the preacher’s daughter’s straight indiscretions.

The film’s parents are unable to accept their children’s same-sex relationships. They’re not only out of touch with the teens, but they’re alarmingly indifferent to the danger they’re exposing them to. Regrettably, single mothers seem especially amenable to this quick fix. They choose to exorcise the kids of their gay lust — and if they can’t resist their carnal urges, they’ll be severely chastened.

Most of the worst violence occurs off screen, narrated by the victim’s screams of terror and agony. After they’ve imagined the worst, audiences are shocked with the bloody aftermath. Yet, writer-director Adrian Chiarella is sure to show just enough of the bizarre assaults to keep viewers on the hook. In one instance, invisible fingers grip a potential victim’s throat, pointing to a tangible but enigmatic menace.

The film weaves some familiar elements throughout the story. Being stalked by something that tries to appear familiar hints at It Follows. The killer is imperceptible to everyone except the victim, making for some Fight Club-esque solo acting. But it lures the teens in by imitating the person they most desire. Then it punishes them for their same-sex attraction by ripping them apart. It becomes impossible for Ryan and Naim to trust what they see as the monster becomes a better mimic the more time they spend together.

To that end, the parents’ attempts to keep the young men apart only creates a stronger bond between them. Scared to death, they must band together to try to defeat the bigoted curse. Taking a page out of Final Destination’s book, they seek the advice of someone else who’s survived the summoning ceremony. Of course, whether they can mount a long-term defence is another matter.

Viewers primarily see the film and its central threat through Naim’s perspective. He watches as this unseen evil seduces his classmates before eventually latching onto him. Consequently, Clausen has the more challenging role, playing lover, victim and fiend at various points of the story. But it’s his and Bird’s integral chemistry that keeps audiences engaged in their battle to love and survive in Chiarella’s feature directorial debut.

Director: Adrian Chiarella
Starring: Joe Bird, Stacy Clausen and Mia Wasikowska

Similar Posts

  • Review: Jennifer Aniston’s ‘Oscar snub’ for ‘Cake’ may not be unwarranted (Includes first-hand account)

    When horrible things happen to some people, their chief coping mechanism is to shut down and shut everyone out. When that terrible thing is prolonged with no end in sight, that bitterness settles in and appears equally endless. In Cake, a venomous woman suffering from chronic pain finally sees the light at the end of the tunnel when someone she knows dies by suicide.

  • Review: ‘The Witches’ is high-gloss, but still amusing (Includes first-hand account)

    While witches flying on broomsticks are an iconic symbol of Halloween, one has to wonder what they do for the other 364 days a year. Also, if they look as hideous as the holiday’s decorations suggest, how do they go unnoticed for all that time? In 1983, Roald Dahl wrote a story about a heinous group of witches with a sinister plan and an alternative family who will do everything in their power to stop them. The book was first adapted in 1990 with the help of Jim Henson, and now director Robert Zemeckis — who is no stranger to special effects-heavy pictures — has taken a turn. Roald Dahl’s The Witches is a relatively faithful adaptation of Dahl’s tale, though it’s been transported to 1968 Alabama.

  • Review: ‘First Man’ puts audiences in the front seat for the moon landing (Includes first-hand account)

    To make history is to be forever immortalized and even though there are sometimes countless people who contribute to the ground-breaking feat, only one or two names are often remembered. Most things are accomplished on the successes and sacrifices of others, but the only story that seems to matter is that of the victorious. Yet, even then, the final act may be recounted in detail while everything that led to it remains in darkness. First Man chronicles Neil Armstrong‘s revolutionary moon mission, but it begins its tale well before the launch.

  • Review: ‘The Humbling’ is a quirky comedy that embraces its insanity (Includes first-hand account)

    It seems the lives of delusional, washed up actors is a popular subject in cinema these days. It’s unfortunate for Al Pacino that Michael Keaton’s Birdman was released first because the comparisons are inevitable and they’re not going to be in favour of his picture. Nevertheless, they are very different types of films. The Humbling is subtler in its character’s hallucinations, confusing reality and fantasy to the point that even the central character and audience don’t know what’s real at all times.

  • Moana review: Same story, same heart

    ‘Moana’ is almost a shot-for-shot, live-action adaptation of the animated film, which means if you like the original, you’ll like this one.