A scene from ‘White Balls on Walls’

Hot Docs Review: ‘White Balls on Walls’ is surprisingly honest

‘White Balls on Walls’ is a frank portrayal of an organization’s earnest efforts to repair decades of exclusion.

While we strive for equity across all realms, one of the greatest shortcomings that has been identified (because it’s so easily noticeable) is a lack of representation, particularly in decision-making roles. Consequently, a lack of diversity in leadership typically trickles down in ways that range from subtle to overt, whether it’s in policy, hiring practices, end products or advertising. In spite of the feeling that this is a sudden realization for some, it’s been a long time coming for others and they’re ready to start breaking down those barriers. White Balls on Walls documents efforts at a Dutch museum to address issues of inclusion on their staff and in their collection.

Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam is the country’s modern art museum. More than 90 percent of its art collection was created by white men and less than one-fifth of the listed staff appear to be non-white. Charl Landvreugd is the new Head of Research and Curatorial Practice. Knowing he may be viewed as a hire to meet a quota, he emphasizes his extensive qualifications and an awareness of a need to tread carefully in his new position. Sitting down for a meeting, museum director Rein Wolfs and his (all-white) management team discuss the collection’s shortfalls and how to begin incorporating more diverse artists, which to some degree was spurred by funding requirements.

Documentary director Sarah Vos began following the Stedelijk staff in 2019 and it’s quite brave of them to allow the filmmaker to record these sometimes challenging and awkward conversations. There’s a lot of discomfort and uncertainty around the table as they discuss including more works by women and people of colour, and it’s difficult for audiences not to notice the lack of representation during these conversations. Similarly, it’s clear Landvreugd wants to instigate change in “how they’ve always done things,” but is also treading lightly and being careful not to push too hard too quickly, noting he doesn’t want to be viewed as a threat. Consequently, he frequently refers to a 1995 protest at the museum by the Guerrilla Girls that called attention to its inequity and gave this documentary its title. Wolfs also consults with curator-at-large Yvette Mutumba about initiatives he’s considering, and her responses are refreshingly honest and constructive.

This is a surprisingly candid portrayal of an organization striving to be better and recognizing that embracing their discomfort is the only way to move forward — an approach made especially clear when they hire one of their most outspoken critics. Whether they forget the camera is there or are simply fully-immersed in the experience, there are no airs about them. Understanding they are embarking on unfamiliar territory, there are no attempts to conceal their concerns or confusion. However, as a viewer, one hopes those at Stedelijk will watch this film and see the areas for even more improvement.

White Balls on Walls had its North American premiere in the Artscapes programme at the Hot Docs Festival.

Read other reviews from the festival.

Director: Sarah Vos

Similar Posts

  • Review: Control is a major theme at Hot Docs 2016 (Includes first-hand account)

    In addition to the standard programmes, the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival always includes a few unique categories that group films with similar themes. This year, “Command + Control” is a collection of documentaries that deal with people and countries who exert control over others, as well as the protagonists and filmmakers who attempt to investigate and provide some command over the situation. We’ve looked at four films from this programme: Credit for Murder, Holy Hell, Tickled and Under the Sun.

  • Review: ‘Ramen Heads’ takes soup to a new level at Hot Docs (Includes first-hand account)

    While eating is an unavoidable necessity of sustained life, it has evolved into much more. In the West, where opulence abounds, food is often treated as something to be experienced by all the senses rather than just the means to satisfying a basic need. Competitions and ratings are used to determine local, national and world’s best, and long waits to taste these culinary masterpieces are expected rather than reviled. Consequently the food documentary has gained momentum in recent years, taking audiences into the kitchens of the world’s elite or behind the scenes of the most renowned contests. This year the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival presents a film called Ramen Heads, which refers to a specific type of food fandom.

  • Review: Hot Docs’ ‘Nightvision’ pushes film subjects to the outer limits (Includes first-hand account)

    The Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival shares a variety of pictures rooted in real-life. From biopics to in-depth investigations, the featured films shock, reveal and entertain audiences. But what of the less traditional subjects that don’t easily fit into a specific category? For the adventurous moviegoer seeking films with a more unique appeal, Hot Docs created the “Nightvision” program. Offering documentaries for genre fans, this category is the go-to for the strange and unusual. Two films included in this year’s program couldn’t be more different from one another, yet still fit perfectly in the offbeat group.