Review: ‘78/52’ invites Hot Docs audiences into the shower with Hitchcock (Includes first-hand account)

Movies are an ingrained element of our culture and an acknowledged form of communicating, directly and indirectly. Cinematic messages can be obvious and built into the narrative, or they can be hidden in the plot and images; sometimes deeper meanings are intended to be understood by some viewers and concealed from others… censors, for instance. Alfred Hitchcock was a master auteur known for circumventing the Motion Picture Production Code with creative framing and the art of inferring rather than showing. One of his greatest and still admired constructions is the shower scene in Psycho, which is thoroughly examined in 78/52.

In 1960, Hitchcock literally changed the way people went to the movies. When Psycho was released in theatres, he required that no one be allowed to enter the show after it began — this was the first time such a request was made of audiences who were accustomed to coming in part way through a film and catching up with what they missed in the subsequent screening. Of course, he wanted to preserve the picture’s many secrets as well as avoid latecomers wondering when Janet Leigh would appear. Yet the shower scene was so much more than a way to shock audiences. It’s meaning and structure has been frequently analyzed, but this documentary is one of the most in-depth examinations to date.

Cinephiles will already be aware of many of the elements discussed in the film, but there’s some lesser known tidbits included for even the most informed fan. Conversely, uninitiated admirers of Hitchcock’s work will find the whole film fascinating and accessible. Historians, horror aficionados, filmmakers, critics and actors, including Guillermo del Toro, Peter Bogdanovich, Eli Roth, Elijah Wood and Jamie Lee Curtis, comment and explore the most minute elements of the scene and its creation. They discuss its implications for the genre as a whole, as well as Hitchcock’s motivations for painstakingly orchestrating such a scene, which lasts mere minutes but took a week to shoot. From Hershey’s chocolate syrup to the reason there’s an unusual cut away from Marion’s corpse, Alexandre O. Philippe‘s documentary is a great follow-up to his equally engaging exploration of the zombie genre.

The Toronto premiere of 78/52 is screening as part of the “Nightvision” program at the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival.

Director: Alexandre O. Philippe

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Bloodshot’ forgets they’re still human (Includes first-hand account)

    Science and technology have been changing the way we live for centuries, particularly since the industrial revolution. From making tasks easier to extending life expectancies, the world is forever evolving due to new discoveries and innovations. Procedures and treatments allow some to “cheat death,” eradicating disease and repairing or replacing damaged parts. However, they’re still only able to reverse death in the movies… for now. Bringing back the dead has mixed results in fiction, but it’s typically a negative experience to some degree and must be rectified by the end. In Bloodshot, a soldier is revived with the superhuman ability to bring armies to their knees.

  • Review: ‘Destroyer’ is a game changer for Nicole Kidman (Includes first-hand account)

    There’s nothing like a good mystery that keeps diving deeper into the narrative before finally revealing the truth. This is often the trademark of a good, gritty, detective-driven crime drama in which you have to understand the past in order to understand the present. Everyone has secrets if you look hard enough and some of them may be worth killing over — the key is recognizing the difference. Destroyer is a complex story that blends the then and now to find an elusive bank robber and murderer.

  • Review: ‘Wild City’ drags corruption through the streets of Hong Kong (Includes first-hand account)

    There are a number of movies that begin with someone choosing to be a Good Samaritan. Whether they hesitate or immediately jump into action, their decision to do the right thing briefly or permanently links them to the person at the receiving end of their aid. Although in most films that use this as a plot device the kind stranger ends up in the line of fire, sharing the target on the other person’s back. In Wild City, this relationship is further complicated by a greedy brother and vengeful assassins.

  • Review: ‘Aquaman’ is king of the DCEU (Includes first-hand account)

    DC has been trying to follow in Marvel’s cinematic footsteps for years, but they’ve been unable to find the same level of success. In spite of their television shows doing relatively well and gaining significant followings, their films have always been lacking. However, they may finally be moving in the right direction. Parts of Justice League were passable and Wonder Woman blew everything else they’d done out of the water. Now, after introducing several characters in the big screen team-up, it’s time for them to helm their standalone pictures. First up is the king of the sea, though that’s not his title when this movie starts — at first, he was just Aquaman.