Review: Hot Docs’ ‘Special Presentations’ demands your attention (Includes first-hand account)

If you’re a festival goer seeking high-profile, high-interest fair, the first place to look is the “Special Presentations” section. Even though some of the selections may fit into other programs, the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival has thoughtfully singled out these movies because they have a certain quality. In some cases the picture is associated with a celebrity or well-known filmmaker, it could already be the subject of considerable buzz prior to its premiere, or the topic could be very timely at present. In the case of the four films listed below, the latter is most true.

The similarities to video games is not accidental. One man uses the phrase “militainment” to describe the pairing of military-style operations and video games. The distinction thrust upon a drone pilot is the people at the end of their missiles are real. Waziristan is under constant siege, resulting in thousands of civilian deaths. The documentary chronicles their efforts to launch a human rights initiative and lawsuit to prevent U.S. weapons from crossing their borders. It also says psychology of drone strikes is “distance creates indifference,” making it easier for soldiers to execute their orders. However, it also raises the issue of how making murder too easy could affect policymaking in the future. One of the film’s most chilling moments is a pilot’s account of his first kill and subsequent descriptions of cheering superiors. The one component missing is follow-up on the projects featured in the narrative.

However, a few weeks into their investigation, their nightmare is amplified. When the police release blurry photos of the suspects in the Boston marathon bombing, one tweet mistakenly mentions a likeness between one of them and Sunil. The misidentification spirals out of control and without any corroboration becomes a “fact” via social media, namely Reddit. Suddenly reporters are contacting the Tripathis regarding Sunil’s “connection” to the attack. This appalling case highlights the changing world of journalism and its relationship with social media. Reddit-ers wanted to beat traditional media to the story and they did — with a completely unverified account that will forever exist on the Internet. While filmmakers fail to speak to any of Sunil’s accusers, Reddit’s Erik Martin acknowledges they could have done more to control the situation. Through the structure of their narrative and statements made within the picture, filmmakers make it clear there are a lot of lessons to be learned related to mental health, news coverage and social responsibility via Sunil’s unfortunate story.

Since simply watching Alwan speak wouldn’t be very cinematic, they create a lot of re-enactments depicting the events he describes. In addition, his story is traced using images, thumbtacks and string on a bulletin board like it’s a criminal investigation — which it is for some people. When it was discovered the WMDs were fabricated, the U.S. administration singled out Alwan as their source and all blame fell upon him. Conversely, he contends, “War was infinite, so I had to follow the course.” He explains how he obtained the information he divulged, how much of it was true and what happened when it was passed onto American intelligence after 9/11. Almost every minute detail, month-by-month, is examined, which depending on the viewer’s point of view can be either fascinating or overkill. In addition, there are fairly long breaks between questions and answers, which gradually becomes irritating.

Cobb and company’s doctrine is so hateful, the fear it inspires in residents pushes them to in some ways match his behaviour. Interviews with anti-hate and white supremacist groups outside of Leith provide interesting insight into the situation beyond the points of view of the residents. Most surprising is the fair and even depiction of both sides of the story. There are considerable segments, particularly in the first section, in which Cobb et al. could be deemed “ordinary” people — until they once again begin spewing their propaganda for an Aryan nation. There is a priceless moment in the film in which Cobb’s partner in crime’s young daughter is shown at home explaining her homework requires her to list words that begin with the letter “N”; the expectation is obvious, but the outcome is amusing. As a result, it’s a gripping story that has multiple, evenly depicted angles and can act as a warning for future schemes.

Ticket and screening information are available on the Hot Docs website.

Similar Posts

  • Modern Whore review: TIFF 2025

    ‘Modern Whore’ is an engaging documentary that dynamically contradicts assumptions about sex work with real-life accounts.

  • Review: ‘Spectre’ isn’t the retirement party this Bond deserved (Includes first-hand account)

    One of the things many people liked about Daniel Craig was that he was ushering the classic spy into a modern day world. While James Bond was always ahead of the game in terms of technology, he’d been peddling the same archaic form of masculinity for decades. The era of Craig was meant to prove that 007 is actually just a man who’s exceptionally skilled at killing people. His first three films worked towards this goal and Spectre would be the last featuring the actor; unfortunately the new age of Bond ended with Skyfall.

  • Review: ‘Triple 9’s cast is more than a triple threat (Includes first-hand account)

    The heist movie is a classic of the crime genre. The various opportunities it provides to blend action, drama and expectation can be very stimulating in the hands of the right director. Moreover, the inclusion of the perspective of the police investigating the robbery adds another layer of intrigue and chance for excitement. Combined with skilled performances, a strong script and well-choreographed action, filmmakers can create a compelling picture that effectively engages audiences from start to finish. Triple 9 is a striking example of everything going right.

  • Review: ‘Hellboy’ gives new meaning to ‘big red’ (Includes first-hand account)

    The debate regarding nature vs. nurture rages on, though the answer is probably a bit of both. However, then the question becomes, which carries more weight and can potentially overpower the other? Not judging a creature by its appearances is typically a grade school lesson, but it can be difficult to keep in mind when one looks so monstrous… or comes from Hell. Yet, with the proper cultivation almost any intelligent being has the potential to be a contributing member of society instead of a destructive one. In Hellboy, he is in a constant struggle with good and evil, but at least good is winning so far.