Review: Clint Eastwood delivers a great film in ‘Richard Jewell’ (Includes first-hand account)

While the American justice system is supposed to be built on the idea that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, it often doesn’t work that way. For one, law enforcement can become so focused on a single suspect, they view all the evidence through a lens of bias. Second, many suspects are often tried by the media and public opinion before they even step foot in a courtroom. Finally, if it turns out the prime suspect is innocent, it’s often decided only after their reputation has suffered irreparable damage. For Richard Jewell, his 15 minutes of fame turns into a never-ending nightmare overnight in this true story.

Richard Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) spent most of his life trying to join law enforcement. As he laboured to realize his dream, he worked as a supply clerk where he met a lawyer named Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell). Richard then moved on to be a discredited security guard and police officer. However, the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta offers a new opportunity for him to regain some prestige. Working security at an outdoor concert venue, Richard spots an abandoned backpack. When hundreds avoid injury after the suspicious package explodes, Richard is a hero… and then he becomes the investigation’s number one suspect.

Richard’s desire to please the people around him and fit in doesn’t really match his law enforcement ambitions. On the other hand, his strict adherence to the rules supersedes his nice guy inclinations and results in very polite requests for people to comply. However, these personality traits also fit the profile of a lone bomber and his deference for authority certainly doesn’t help his case. Luckily, Watson knows how to play hardball and has enough distrust of “the man” for both of them. Unfortunately, getting Richard to stop helping the FBI build a case against him is a difficult task.

Over the last couple of years, Hauser has been making an impression on audiences with these odd characters who are socially awkward and entangled in extraordinary situations. Even though the personalities he’s portrayed haven’t varied much, he’s certainly found a niche that works. Rockwell is terrific as Richard’s protector, while also claiming most of the humorous lines. Jon Hamm is a great adversary, leading the investigation and repeatedly tricking Richard into providing evidence. Yet, in spite of her lesser role, Kathy Bates consistently shines as Richard’s mother, Bobi. On the flipside, Olivia Wilde‘s portrayal of reporter Kathy Scruggs, who broke the story about the FBI’s investigation into Richard, seems a bit over-the-top as they attempt to place additional blame on the media.

Director Clint Eastwood‘s depiction of Richard’s story is unquestionably siding with the accused, but it’s still a fascinating story with captivating characters who draw in viewers. Of course, as is typically the case with the filmmaker, the movie runs a little over two hours and is likely a bit longer than is necessary, but it’s not that noticeable.

Don’t miss incredible performances from an all-star cast in #RichardJewell. Get tickets: pic.twitter.com/f28joIHlFn

— Richard Jewell (@RJewellFilm) December 6, 2019

Director: Clint Eastwood
Starring: Paul Walter Hauser, Sam Rockwell and Jon Hamm

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Dark Horse’ is a heartwarming tale of underdogs with 2 to 4 legs (Includes first-hand account)

    It likely comes as no surprise that participating in certain sports is often also a sign of class. The more expensive the equipment, ample the accessories and demanding the time commitment, the equally less likely it is for a lower class person to partake. Greyhounds have long been referred to as “the poor man’s racehorse” because actual ponies are so costly. However in Dark Horse, a small Welsh community bands together to prove a working-class horse can make its mark in the world of competitive racing.

  • Review: ‘The Hateful Eight’ takes its unique Western on the road (Includes first-hand account)

    Before brick and mortar cinemas became popular, movies and their projectionists used to travel from town to town like the circus. Going to see a film was a special event rather than something to do when you’re bored. This tradition of distinction was renewed with the creation of large-scale productions and the allure of movie stars. Moreover, people didn’t sit in the dark for three-plus hours without a bathroom, snack or cigarette break so they were built into the screening. These are the experiences writer/director Quentin Tarantino is attempting to replicate with the 70 mm roadshow version of The Hateful Eight.

  • Review: ‘Coco’ is a striking story that shines brightly in many ways (Includes first-hand account)

    Even though many aspects of particular cultures have been monetized, it doesn’t mean everyone has a firm grasp of its original meaning or purpose. Some things are simply adopted because they have an appealing look that can be easily mass-produced while retaining only a loose association with its origins. Sugar skulls are a wildly popular decorative item, however its connection to the Day of the Dead and the reason for the celebration is only vaguely understood by various patrons. Pixar decided to explore the event via their typically accessible storytelling style in their latest picture, Coco.