Review: Clint Eastwood delivers a great film in ‘Richard Jewell’ (Includes first-hand account)

While the American justice system is supposed to be built on the idea that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, it often doesn’t work that way. For one, law enforcement can become so focused on a single suspect, they view all the evidence through a lens of bias. Second, many suspects are often tried by the media and public opinion before they even step foot in a courtroom. Finally, if it turns out the prime suspect is innocent, it’s often decided only after their reputation has suffered irreparable damage. For Richard Jewell, his 15 minutes of fame turns into a never-ending nightmare overnight in this true story.

Richard Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) spent most of his life trying to join law enforcement. As he laboured to realize his dream, he worked as a supply clerk where he met a lawyer named Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell). Richard then moved on to be a discredited security guard and police officer. However, the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta offers a new opportunity for him to regain some prestige. Working security at an outdoor concert venue, Richard spots an abandoned backpack. When hundreds avoid injury after the suspicious package explodes, Richard is a hero… and then he becomes the investigation’s number one suspect.

Richard’s desire to please the people around him and fit in doesn’t really match his law enforcement ambitions. On the other hand, his strict adherence to the rules supersedes his nice guy inclinations and results in very polite requests for people to comply. However, these personality traits also fit the profile of a lone bomber and his deference for authority certainly doesn’t help his case. Luckily, Watson knows how to play hardball and has enough distrust of “the man” for both of them. Unfortunately, getting Richard to stop helping the FBI build a case against him is a difficult task.

Over the last couple of years, Hauser has been making an impression on audiences with these odd characters who are socially awkward and entangled in extraordinary situations. Even though the personalities he’s portrayed haven’t varied much, he’s certainly found a niche that works. Rockwell is terrific as Richard’s protector, while also claiming most of the humorous lines. Jon Hamm is a great adversary, leading the investigation and repeatedly tricking Richard into providing evidence. Yet, in spite of her lesser role, Kathy Bates consistently shines as Richard’s mother, Bobi. On the flipside, Olivia Wilde‘s portrayal of reporter Kathy Scruggs, who broke the story about the FBI’s investigation into Richard, seems a bit over-the-top as they attempt to place additional blame on the media.

Director Clint Eastwood‘s depiction of Richard’s story is unquestionably siding with the accused, but it’s still a fascinating story with captivating characters who draw in viewers. Of course, as is typically the case with the filmmaker, the movie runs a little over two hours and is likely a bit longer than is necessary, but it’s not that noticeable.

Don’t miss incredible performances from an all-star cast in #RichardJewell. Get tickets: pic.twitter.com/f28joIHlFn

— Richard Jewell (@RJewellFilm) December 6, 2019

Director: Clint Eastwood
Starring: Paul Walter Hauser, Sam Rockwell and Jon Hamm

Similar Posts

  • Out Standing review: TIFF 2025

    ‘Out Standing’ follows the real-life trials of Canada’s first woman infantry member, highlighting the sexism she experienced at every step.

  • Review: ‘Boy Erased’ only has to tell its story to be affecting (Includes first-hand account)

    In spite of certain actions, behaviours and programs proving harmful, it’s been exceptionally difficult to eradicate them. Therefore, it’s become the work of the survivors to educate others about the negative effects and warn them away from these damaging elements. Of course, those who choose not to believe will never be convinced, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t try — saving one is better than none at all. Gay conversion therapy is a prime example of a destructive system that is meant more for the people around the person enrolled than the person themselves, yet they continue to operate across the United States. Boy Erased is one man’s experience at such a camp.

  • Review: ‘Luce’ defies expectations, but what’s going on behind that smile (Includes first-hand account)

    Everyone likes an underdog story. Seeing people/teams/animals succeed against all odds appeals to audiences because it makes them feel good by proxy. However, not a lot of thought is often given to the pressure these expectations can place on the one carrying everyone’s hopes on their shoulders. Of course they want to be successful for themselves, but there’s the added burden of potentially disappointing all their supporters if they don’t finish on top. Sure they say your best is good enough, but there’s always that little voice in the back of your mind that whispers it’s not true. In Luce, a young man faces all of these issues with mixed results.

  • Review: ‘Dark Star: H.R. Giger’s World’ expands on the artist’s legacy (Includes first-hand account)

    Many artists gain notoriety after their death. While their lives are chronicled, it’s often through a posthumous biopic in which it’s necessary the artist be portrayed by some actor who mimics their ability for the screen. However more documentary filmmakers have been taking the opportunity to record their talents and tales while the subject is still alive and able to share a first-hand account. Though Dark Star: H.R. Giger’s World is being released after the artist’s death, it’s still a privileged instance in which a notoriously private figure opened his life for the film.