Review: Clint Eastwood delivers a great film in ‘Richard Jewell’ (Includes first-hand account)

While the American justice system is supposed to be built on the idea that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, it often doesn’t work that way. For one, law enforcement can become so focused on a single suspect, they view all the evidence through a lens of bias. Second, many suspects are often tried by the media and public opinion before they even step foot in a courtroom. Finally, if it turns out the prime suspect is innocent, it’s often decided only after their reputation has suffered irreparable damage. For Richard Jewell, his 15 minutes of fame turns into a never-ending nightmare overnight in this true story.

Richard Jewell (Paul Walter Hauser) spent most of his life trying to join law enforcement. As he laboured to realize his dream, he worked as a supply clerk where he met a lawyer named Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell). Richard then moved on to be a discredited security guard and police officer. However, the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta offers a new opportunity for him to regain some prestige. Working security at an outdoor concert venue, Richard spots an abandoned backpack. When hundreds avoid injury after the suspicious package explodes, Richard is a hero… and then he becomes the investigation’s number one suspect.

Richard’s desire to please the people around him and fit in doesn’t really match his law enforcement ambitions. On the other hand, his strict adherence to the rules supersedes his nice guy inclinations and results in very polite requests for people to comply. However, these personality traits also fit the profile of a lone bomber and his deference for authority certainly doesn’t help his case. Luckily, Watson knows how to play hardball and has enough distrust of “the man” for both of them. Unfortunately, getting Richard to stop helping the FBI build a case against him is a difficult task.

Over the last couple of years, Hauser has been making an impression on audiences with these odd characters who are socially awkward and entangled in extraordinary situations. Even though the personalities he’s portrayed haven’t varied much, he’s certainly found a niche that works. Rockwell is terrific as Richard’s protector, while also claiming most of the humorous lines. Jon Hamm is a great adversary, leading the investigation and repeatedly tricking Richard into providing evidence. Yet, in spite of her lesser role, Kathy Bates consistently shines as Richard’s mother, Bobi. On the flipside, Olivia Wilde‘s portrayal of reporter Kathy Scruggs, who broke the story about the FBI’s investigation into Richard, seems a bit over-the-top as they attempt to place additional blame on the media.

Director Clint Eastwood‘s depiction of Richard’s story is unquestionably siding with the accused, but it’s still a fascinating story with captivating characters who draw in viewers. Of course, as is typically the case with the filmmaker, the movie runs a little over two hours and is likely a bit longer than is necessary, but it’s not that noticeable.

Don’t miss incredible performances from an all-star cast in #RichardJewell. Get tickets: pic.twitter.com/f28joIHlFn

— Richard Jewell (@RJewellFilm) December 6, 2019

Director: Clint Eastwood
Starring: Paul Walter Hauser, Sam Rockwell and Jon Hamm

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘I Smile Back’ is Sarah Silverman’s sincere portrait of addiction (Includes first-hand account)

    Without the proper coping mechanisms, life’s pressures can be overwhelming. Self- and society-imposed expectations are sometimes not only challenging but impossible to achieve. Mothers often feel this the most as everyone seems to have an opinion about what makes a good mom, providing varied and conflicting advice that can be enough to drive any parent to the edge. In I Smile Back, a woman who desires nothing more than to be a good wife and mother cannot overcome her self-destructive tendencies.

  • Review: ‘20th Century Women’ is a tribute to all the women in our lives (Includes first-hand account)

    The ‘70s in the United States was a tumultuous time to live and grow up. Beneath the raucous never-ending war and countless protests, the women’s movement was finding, negotiating and establishing a new place in society. Punk was screaming about the sorrows of the working class, while female writers were attempting to empower other women by demystifying their bodies and identifying areas of oppression. The need for change was sweeping the nation and, as in 20th Century Women, it was starting at home.

  • Review: ‘Harry Potter’ 4K goes back to where it all began (Includes first-hand account)

    It’s amazing to think that Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint were introduced to the world 16 years ago, and then grew up before audience’s eyes over the next decade as they and the beloved characters they portrayed turned from children to young adults. A few months ago, years five through seven at Hogwarts were released on 4K ultra-high-definition and the effect was stunning. The darkest scenes were displayed in rich shades of black that illuminated the many wicked deeds that occurred in the shadows. Now the first four years of their magical education and battles against Voldemort have also been transferred to 4K: Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone; Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets; Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban; and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.