Review: ‘Deepwater Horizon’ puts audiences at the centre of the disaster (Includes first-hand account)

There’s frequently more than one side to any story, but that doesn’t mean they’re only conflicting accounts of the same events. In a major incident, there can exist the perspectives of the participants, the observers and then the aftermath. It’s often the latter that gets the most attention or people remember best, but that doesn’t make the other narratives less important; in fact, they can provide a greater understanding of the consequences that eventually moved into focus. In the case of Deepwater Horizon, most people are aware of the biggest oil spill in U.S. history but less familiar with the events that led to the disaster.

In April 2010, BP is trying to setup an oil drill off the coast of Texas, but the project is more than a month behind schedule and the higher ups are becoming anxious… and reckless. Jimmy Harrell (Kurt Russell) leads a team of experts that should have the last word when it comes to the drill’s integrity and the safety of the crew, but BP executives on board the Deepwater Horizon rig believe they know better — in their frugal wisdom, they even dismissed the test crew before they could complete all the required diagnostics. Of course cutting corners has rarely resulted in sounder infrastructure and this instance is no different. Not following protocols and bullying subordinates into complacency leads to the total destruction of the rig, the loss of several lives and an oil disaster that impacted the local environment for years.

Director Peter Berg knows a thing or two about telling a gripping story that combines a compelling narrative and big explosions. He even worked with Mark Wahlberg on his last feature, which was also based on a true story. The added challenge of engaging audiences in this movie is everyone already knows what’s going to happen, so Berg had to find a way to create character connections as well as accurately (?) recreate the terrifying destruction of the rig. The former is accomplished by concentrating viewers’ attention on specific players: Jimmy, drilling engineer Mike Williams (Wahlberg) and his wife (Kate Hudson), flotation specialist Andrea Fleytas (Gina Rodriguez), drill operators Jason Anderson (Ethan Suplee) and Caleb Holloway (Dylan O’Brien), and BP exec Mr. Vidrine (John Malkovich). The catastrophe is then shown through the perspectives of these characters, keeping viewers at the centre of the danger as the external rescue efforts prove inadequate. As the damage rises to irreparable proportions, the only thing that matters is saving as many lives as possible.

Kate Hudson’s new film DWHMovie examines the 2010 oil spill from a lesser-known angle UuOpx6nIHU

— Fallon Tonight (@FallonTonight) September 28, 2016

Berg effectively puts audiences on the Deepwater Horizon as it is torn apart by the pressure of the breach and set ablaze as oil spews from the unsecured hole. He frequently uses an underwater camera to illustrate the stress on the drill and the failure of various safeguard mechanisms. These images unite to generate tangible tension that radiates from the screen and fills the theatre. Audiences sit on the edge of their seats, waiting to see what else could possibly go wrong in this increasingly horrible situation.

The film also had its world premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival. Check out the rest of our TIFF 2016 coverage.

Director: Peter Berg
Starring: Mark Wahlberg, Kurt Russell and John Malkovich

Similar Posts

  • Review: These releases know their audience

    This week’s releases include a different approach to the superhero narrative; an animated series made for fans; a creepy family reunion; a movie that left its mark and its musical adaptation; and an unusual gunfight.

  • Review: TIFF 2018: ‘Firecrackers’ delivers a feisty, genuine experience (Includes first-hand account)

    Being a teenage girl often feels like a trial, but it’s one that seems to be getting more difficult… or at least more people are now acknowledging the problems unique to being a young woman in a patriarchal society. Social media and technology have certainly been game changers as immediacy has grown paramount, judgements are delivered more freely and typical adolescent mistakes have gained a permanency that has long-term consequences. In Firecrackers, two young women are desperate to escape the oppression they feel in their small town, but even the best laid plans can be upended.

  • Review: ‘A Wrinkle in Time’ gets somewhat lost in the folds (Includes first-hand account)

    For many young children who lose a parent, it’s more consoling to believe something fantastical took them away and they still exist somewhere out there… it means they may return one day. In most cases, the likeliness of this occurring is slim to none – but most of us don’t live in a world of magic and make-believe. Combining science fiction and fantasy, A Wrinkle in Time is about the enduring hope that a little girl’s father is simply lost somewhere in the universe waiting to be found with the help of a few enchanted guides.

  • Review: ‘Ready or Not’ is a bloody good time (Includes first-hand account)

    Marrying someone often means also marrying their pre-existing loved ones — for better or worse. It’s great if your in-laws are wonderful, but can be a real trial if the dislikes outweigh the things you like about them. Or there could just be that one monstrous elephant that’s always in the room when they’re around. In the back of your head, you may wonder if they feel the same way about you… or maybe they haven’t made much of an effort to hide how they really feel. But to keep the peace, you smile politely and go along with their strange family traditions. Unfortunately in Ready or Not, ignoring these signs leads to a potentially fatal wedding night.