Review: ‘Don’t Breathe’ holds on until the very end(s) (Includes first-hand account)

There’s no such thing as the perfect crime; there’s always unexpected variables that require alterations or improvisation, and sometimes these surprises are enough to derail the whole operation. Murphy’s Law states that something can and will go wrong in even the best laid plans — the question becomes one of the final outcome. In Don’t Breathe, a group of amateur thieves discover their victim is a bigger problem than the police in even their worst case scenario.

Money, Alex and Rocky (Daniel Zovatto, Dylan Minnette and Jane Levy) have been doing low-risk house robberies for some time. They survey their target, take less than $10,000 in goods and then sell it to a black market broker. However these small jobs are not getting them to their goal of leaving town fast enough; so when a too-good-to-be-true tip lands in their lap, they jump on it. There’s a man (Stephen Lang) who lives alone in a dilapidated house in an unoccupied neighbourhood. But he’s living well below his means after receiving a hefty settlement following his daughter’s death, which means the money is hidden somewhere in the house. And the cherry on top of their temptation sundae is he’s also blind.

This is a reverse heist movie in which the robbers are pursued by their target. Trapped in the blind man’s house with his secrets makes escape far more difficult then they could’ve imagined. He’s unsurprisingly paranoid and has taken corresponding precautions; that, combined with his keen sense of hearing and optional use of light, turns his home into a prison for the intruders. Though there is some introductory content at the start of the film, it doesn’t really find its stride until the burglary begins. From the moment they walk up the blind man’s driveway, the intensity begins to build and is more-or-less maintained throughout the rest of the picture.

While writer/director Fede Alvarez demonstrates a clear understanding of the fundamentals of creating an effective thriller in his sophomore feature, there are also some serious issues with the movie. At the film’s start, there is a significant plot point that remains unaddressed for the rest of the picture even though it is a catalyst for the main narrative. Then the final act consists of a seemingly endless series of conclusions. Each time the narrative appears to have found its finale, someone off-screen says “But wait, there’s more.” Even though the individual endings are suitable, their procession becomes somewhat tedious by the time the credits finally roll. In addition, most of the big reveals are generally predictable — though they are incorporated into the narrative well.

In spite of its faults, the film is a mostly respectable thriller with a talented cast and tangible atmosphere that’s received the stamp of approval from music icon and horror aficionado icon Slash.

Mark my words; see DontBreathe this Friday. It will fuck you up. iiii]; )’ August 24, 2016

Director: Fede Alvarez
Starring: Jane Levy, Stephen Lang and Dylan Minnette

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Twin Peaks: From Z to A’ is the ultimate mystery collection (Includes first-hand account)

    When Twin Peaks premiered in 1990, it was one of the strangest mysteries to takeover network television. Created by Mark Frost and David Lynch, the series drew on elements of detective fiction, as well as daytime serials and the horror genre. However, as with Lynch’s other projects, it had a quirky sense of humour, countless moments of surrealism and a distinguished look. Although it only lasted two seasons, the show gained a cult following and a permanent place in the pop culture zeitgeist. Consequently, it also produced a prequel movie, Fire Walk with Me, which was accompanied by nearly 90 minutes of deleted and alternate scenes titled, “The Missing Pieces,” and a 2017 limited event series (or third season) written by Lynch and Frost, and promoted as Twin Peaks: The Return. Now fans can own all of these narratives in one attractive boxset called Twin Peaks: From Z to A.

  • Review: ‘Black or White’ has the uncomfortable conversations (Includes first-hand account)

    Preliminary judgement based on physical traits is virtually engrained in our psyche. When you look at someone, the first thing you notice is their physique, desirability and/or skin colour. No level of education can reverse this process, but as a character in this film suggests, “What matters is your second, third and fourth thought.” Race relations are at the centre of Black or White, but it earnestly explores covert prejudices that many are hesitant to admit and are difficult to eradicate.

  • Review: ‘Mistress America’ wears its crown proudly (Includes first-hand account)

    Divorce is a recurring subject in fiction. Even though it’s no longer true that 50 per cent of marriages fail, it was at some point. However re-marriage and the blending of families is portrayed less often, unless in the form of a family-friendly comedy. Being an adult suddenly connected to another adult because of a choice made by your parents is a strange proposition; though it could also be an exciting opportunity to bond with someone who you otherwise would never have met. Both are true in Mistress America, which features a whirlwind sisterhood.

  • Review: TIFF 2016: ‘The Exception’ should be the rule in historical drama (Includes first-hand account)

    Historical dramas almost always run the risk of being dry, expansive pictures that fail to find the balance between entertaining and informing audiences. Of course it’s important to know and understand the past, but the advantage of film is it can be more enjoyable than a textbook or classroom. A movie is permitted flourishes for theatrical effect and some leeway regarding events in the narrative in order to adequately convey the real-life incidents. Even adapting a story from a book can require some adjustments to engage theatre audiences. The Exception is almost an anomaly in this area in that the historical recreation manages to do all of these things correctly.