A scene from ‘Joker: Folie à Deux’

Review: ‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ deliberately and mistakenly loses focus

‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ combines the title character’s murder trial with a poorly concocted musical.

There are videos and writings in which psychologists and psychiatrists attempt to analyze and diagnose comic book characters’ mental wellness. It’s not surprising many of these heroes and villains have some form of disorder or psychosis that is often more complex than just being a psychopath or narcissist. Yet, most of the stories focus on good vs. evil, ignoring the reasons they do what the do as their actions outweigh the need to understand. But Joker: Folie à Deux is consumed with why the title character is the way he is, examining the effects of his past and mental health on his behaviour.

Following the events of the first film, including the live execution of TV talk show host, Murray Franklin (Robert De Niro), Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix), a.k.a. Joker, is now an inmate at Arkham Asylum. His defense attorney (Catherine Keener) is determined to convince a jury that he suffers from multiple personality disorder (now known as dissociative identity disorder), caused by a traumatic childhood and triggered by a violent altercation. In opposition, Assistant District Attorney Harvey Dent (Harry Lawtey) plans to prove Arthur was fully aware of his actions. And Arthur is just going with the flow — until he meets Lee, a.k.a. Harley Quinzel (Lady Gaga), an Arkham patient obsessed with the Joker. Suddenly, Arthur has a reason to live and embrace his alter ego’s swagger.

Once again, writer-director Todd Phillips takes an unconventional approach to the DC characters, while still sprinkling canon throughout the narrative. From Lee’s background and subtle costumes to Thomas Wayne’s television appearances, from Arkham Asylum to Gotham city, it’s clear the film is unfolding in the DC universe, even if it’s not a typical comic book movie. Most of the picture unfolds within the confines of Arkham and the courtroom, largely limiting the audience’s perspective to Arthur’s experiences, which is challenging since fantasy and reality frequently intersect.

Arthur always daydreamed to escape the dreariness of his life, imagining a successful stand-up career or a thoughtful girlfriend (Zazie Beetz). This film takes it a step further as now Arthur fantasizes in musicals. Whether real or imaginary, he sings, dances and even taps. Sometimes it’s on stage, in front of an audience, and other times he performs within the walls of Arkham Asylum. However, this turn of events even better explains Lady Gaga’s casting in the role of Harley, as the pair have several duets and harmonize well together. The songs are mostly from the 1950s and ‘60s, including “That’s Life,” “Get Happy,” “If My Friends Could See Me Now” and several reprisals of “Gonna Build a Mountain.”

However, all these efforts to be unconventional and further push the boundaries of comic book movies produce a haphazard and repetitive picture with too many musical interludes and the most unexciting approach to two of comic’s most fascinating personalities. Phoenix’s Arthur is weak and unfunny, while Joker is overdramatic and overwhelmed by love. Similarly, Lady Gaga’s performance is tempered with brief bursts of irrationality, fuelled by her fixation with Joker’s chaotic behaviour. She becomes the star of Arthur’s fantasies, which are vibrant but superficial, unnecessarily padding the film’s inflated runtime. Better titled, “Joker: Trial of the Century,” the movie would have also been improved if it reigned in its focus.

Director: Todd Phillips
Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Lady Gaga and Brendan Gleeson

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Split’ is an invigorating thriller that restores Shyamalan’s rep (Includes first-hand account)

    If there’s one thing that can be said about writer/director M. Night Shyamalan, it’s that he has interesting ideas. Not all of those concepts have translated into good films, but there have been some clear winners within the dozen titles listed on his IMDB page. He’s spent his 25-year career trying to keep audiences on their toes, while also telling engrossing stories. His penchant for a final twist has become a signature and therefore the burden falls on him to truly make it unexpected. It’s been nearly two decades since he delivered one as shocking as the final reveal in Split, which has been almost as long in the making.

  • Op-Ed: Top 10 films of 2016

    Film critics watch a lot of movies. Previous attempts to keep track have failed, but between festivals, and theatrical and home releases the number easily climbs over 500 each year — and yet there are countless films still to be seen. Obviously the quality of these films vary greatly and most of them are not worth ever mentioning again, but there are a fraction of others whose praises should be shouted from the rooftops. Limiting the list to just 10 can be a struggle; particularly as one debates which picture is most deserving of that final place… thus we also have the honourable mentions section. The only basic restriction imposed here is the film must have played theatrically in North America in 2016; although the proliferation of streaming has generated at least one exception.

  • Review: This week’s releases play the cards they’re dealt

    This week’s releases include the return to a post-apocalyptic world; an exaggerated version of history; an enduring, righteous feud; the first adventures of a new USS crew; an unwelcome gift; a passionate amateur film crew; and a heist gone wrong.