Review: ‘Late Night Double Feature’ loves its monstrous characters (Includes first-hand account)

While the modest revival of Grindhouse horror has not achieved the popularity it held in its heyday, there is still enough of an interest for filmmakers to create new contributions to the genre. Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez are probably the most prominent providers in recent years, but there has been a steady production of new pictures dealing with sex, violence and bizarre subjects. Late Night Double Feature is the latest addition to embrace this spirit.

Dr. Nasty (Brian Scott Carleton), along with Nurse Nasty (Jamie Elizabeth Sampson), is the host of an after-hours horror double feature — an element of TV programming made popular in the ‘80s in which an eccentric personality would introduce equally strange movies to night owls. Off-camera, the actor is an abusive drunk. The first picture in the double bill is “Dinner for Monsters,” which follows a formerly successful chef (Nick Smyth) who’s lost his flair and is about to lose his late father’s restaurant. Shortly after his last loyal customer vows never to return, he receives a phone call confirming a dinner party for six later that night. When he arrives, he’s shocked to discover the main course is “long pig.” The second movie is about a man (Colin Price) who provides a particular service to a select group of clients. In spite of his secrecy, he’s contacted by a new customer (Caleigh Le Grand). The appointment begins routinely, but takes a ghastly turn that sends him running for his life. But apparently he does not go far enough.

Anthologies are a popular structure in horror as it allows several filmmakers to work together in telling briefer stories while maintaining a full-length format. It can be difficult to sustain extreme levels of intensity for a prolonged period, extend certain ideas beyond 30 minutes or even build an adequate special effects budget for longer screen times, so the shorter, individual runtimes can be beneficial in many ways.

The first film in the double bill is relatively competent in its inexplicable depiction of a morbid gathering. The scenes in the kitchen are vague and frenetic, and probably the weakest visual in the story. Conversely, the ghoulish portrayal of the dinner guests is exceptionally well done and makes them cartoonish and unmistakably evil. The second “feature” is bloody and morally ambiguous as it focuses on facilitating a specific aspect of mental illness; though it does later condemn the provider’s actions via a horrific confrontation. The pace of this movie, however, doesn’t match the higher energy of its predecessors, which does disrupt the overall flow to some extent.

Finally the framing story embraces the spirit of grindhouse, but possible too heartily. The Nurse Nasty character is somewhat of a punching bag for the male personalities, even though one of them eventually comes to her rescue. As the story progresses, it can be vexing to watch in the context of the current climate of misogyny. It’s also somewhat disjointed to include the behind-the-scenes elements of the framing story, while attempting to give viewers the experience of watching the “show” on television with commercials.

Overall there is potential in all aspects of each of these pictures; it’s just not fully realized in this project.

Late Night Double Feature screened as part of the 2015 Canadian Film Fest in Toronto.

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Me and Earl and the Dying Girl’ is year’s best movie contender (Includes first-hand account)

    While some of the best remembered teen movies are comedies, some of the most resonant narratives have been dramas in which youths are forced to come to terms with some difficult aspect of living beyond the typical adolescent heartbreak. Executed incorrectly and the tale is an overwrought mess of emotions or wholly superficial. Conversely, if done properly, the film will have a lasting impact that affects and stays with audiences. Me and Earl and the Dying Girl is an exceptional example of the latter that currently stands as one of the best movies of the year.

  • Review: ‘Wild City’ drags corruption through the streets of Hong Kong (Includes first-hand account)

    There are a number of movies that begin with someone choosing to be a Good Samaritan. Whether they hesitate or immediately jump into action, their decision to do the right thing briefly or permanently links them to the person at the receiving end of their aid. Although in most films that use this as a plot device the kind stranger ends up in the line of fire, sharing the target on the other person’s back. In Wild City, this relationship is further complicated by a greedy brother and vengeful assassins.

  • Review: ‘Furious 7’ gives fans everything they want and then some (Includes first-hand account)

    When the first film premiered in 2001, there was a lot of uncertainty whether The Fast and the Furious would launch a successful franchise — a theory the second film did not do much to refute as it focused on only one-half of the dynamic duo that propelled the original. Though none of the early characters appear in the third film, The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift breathed new life into the franchise. The fourth film‘s reunion unleashed a can of NOS and it hasn’t slowed down since. In Furious 7, the story is looping in on itself and doing everything required of a successful series.

  • Review: ‘Bridge of Spies’ is a stirring but welcome crossing (Includes first-hand account)

    Regardless of one’s opinions of Steven Spielberg or Tom Hanks, when the two come together to make a film there’s generally little doubt that it will be good. The topics of their collaborations have varied over the years from the war to immigration to a clever criminal. In Bridge of Spies, they add espionage to the list, though the actor thankfully is not the one sneaking around stealing government secrets.