Review: ‘Lizzie’ describes a dark and scandalous motive for murder (Includes first-hand account)

Lizzie Borden took an axe,
And gave her mother forty whacks;
When she saw what she had done,
She gave her father forty-one.

This became a popular skipping-rope rhyme after the infamous slayings in 1892, though its source isn’t exactly known. It’s also not really accurate since her stepmother suffered 18 blows and her father 11, but it speaks to the brutality of the crime and public opinion, which was convinced of her guilt even if the jury was not. In spite of being acquitted, Borden and the unsolved murders have remained a topic of American mythology and speculation of who was responsible has continued for more than 125 years, immortalized in books, films and theatrical productions. The latest to explore this notorious crime is Lizzie.

Lizzie Borden (Chloë Sevigny) was an unmarried woman in her 30s who enjoyed socializing and going to the theatre, generally unaccompanied. Her father, Andrew Borden (Jamey Sheridan), was unhappy with her behaviour, but Lizzie never cared for his opinion and found more than one way to rebel against his rules. In response, Andrew decides to appoint Lizzie’s uncle (Denis O’Hare) as her custodian in the event of his death. In the meantime, Bridget Sullivan (Kristen Stewart) emigrated from Ireland to America and was the family’s live-in maid — a situation Andrew took advantage of via nightly intrusions while Lizzie’s stepmother, Abby (Fiona Shaw), slept. However, Lizzie and Bridget formed a more consensual relationship in secret… until they were discovered. Both Andrew and Abby were killed shortly after.

This theory that relates Lizzie’s motives to her homosexuality was proposed by mystery author Ed McBain in his 1984 novel, also titled Lizzie. In this film, Andrew is shown to be oppressive and perverse. Lizzie protests her father’s conduct, but her actions never go unpunished. On the other hand, Bridget is forced to submit and remain silent for fear of losing her job and being blacklisted by Lizzie’s powerful father. They connect through their mutual dislike for Andrew and their shared feeling of helplessness, but there’s also a level of joy that emerges from their clandestine bond. While Andrew learns of their tryst and takes steps to terminate it, it’s only one of many reasons that contribute to Lizzie’s desire to murder him. Besides, she’s never liked her stepmother, resenting her for trying to take the place of her deceased mother.

The timeline is a bit of a jumble as it goes between Lizzie’s trial and the events in the weeks/months leading up to the slaughter. There’s no way to track the amount of time that passes, but the mounting tension in the house and Lizzie’s increasing desperation is tangible. The overall tone of the film is very sullen, which means even the romantic element of the movie is still rather sombre. Stewart is comfortable in the part as she demonstrated she could play a brooding young woman entwined with a forbidden love in her introductory role. Sevigny is constantly on edge and often borderline frantic, which makes her choice to kill believable but her character difficult to empathize with.

This is an interesting theory about the infamous murders, though it does also assume Lizzie was freed because she had an alibi rather than because the all-male jury couldn’t believe a woman was capable of such violence. This combined with the moroseness of the picture makes it a satisfactory narrative but not an entertaining watch.

Director: Craig William Macneill
Starring: Kristen Stewart, Chloë Sevigny and Denis O’Hare

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Green Book’ is swelling with kindness and humour (Includes first-hand account)

    Though it may not seem like a big deal now, there was a time when certain things simply weren’t done… and many of those things stemmed from the colour of our skin. While some areas were quicker to progress past segregation and the like, others were staunch in their backwards beliefs and tightly held on to them until the choice was no longer theirs. But there were brave men and women who accepted the responsibility of forcing change, as well as the consequences when their efforts were poorly received. In Green Book, an accomplished black musician embarks on a tour of the South.

  • Review: ‘Can You Ever Forgive Me?’ needn’t ask to forgive anything (Includes first-hand account)

    There are certain narratives, which even though they are based on true stories, they are difficult to believe. Generally, these involve the gullibility of those around the protagonist as they are permitted to enact their scheme with little to no resistance. There are people who will continue to push the boundaries until they are firmly stopped; but until then, they will take advantage of any loophole they can uncover to skirt the rules and maintain their ruse. The puzzling thing is it’s almost never a malicious act but rather one of defiance or self-interest. In Can You Ever Forgive Me?, it’s a bit of both.

  • Review: ‘Hidden Figures’ is a testament of our ability to create change (Includes first-hand account)

    When one reviews humanity’s various achievements over the centuries, it becomes evident that our potential for great things has not evolved as much as our ability to accomplish them. Technological advancements have made it possible for even some of the most far-fetched dreams to be converted into reality. Accordingly, it’s not so much that the population is getting smarter but that they have the tools to fully realize their brilliance. Thus, when one looks at a historical drama like Hidden Figures, the wonder isn’t at what they could do but how hard they had to fight to do it.

  • Review: Someone has an unfair advantage in ’Sixty Minutes to Midnight’ (Includes first-hand account)

    As war and disasters increasingly normalize violence and death, people become immune to the bloody consequences… even more frighteningly, they can begin to crave the carnage. It’s been theorized that this phenomenon has led to an increase in brutality in movies and video games, which in turn has led to an increase in everyday aggression. This idea has been represented in fiction in a variety of ways and for much longer than the current potential culprits have existed. The latest to explore this lust for blood is an independent picture titled Sixty Minutes to Midnight, which turns surviving into a game that’s certainly fixed.