A scene from ‘Smile 2’

Review: ‘Smile 2’ finds new ways to go from grin to cringe

‘Smile 2’ follows the curse as it’s transmitted to a famous person who doesn’t have the luxury of going crazy in private.

Over-the-top horror centres on imaginary monsters wreaking havoc and committing impossible acts. Extra strong, oversized, impervious and physically out-of-the-ordinary, these killers create a safe distance at which fans can watch and be superficially scared. However, the more frightening scares come from stories that mimic real life. The movies that take ordinary experiences and uncover their inherent creepiness or feature regular people with bloodcurdling secrets are far more menacing. Even the smallest possibility that a film premise could become a reality can haunt audiences, making the narrative more frightening than one based in pure fiction. Smile 2 does this by making the most benign, everyday expression startling.

Skye Riley (Naomi Scott) is a famous pop star preparing to launch a big comeback tour after a fatal car accident killed her boyfriend and left her with chronic back pain. Now clean and sober, she’s ready to get back out there — or at least her mother (Rosemarie DeWitt) has convinced her she is because any more time away and people will forget she was famous. However, Skye is infected with a paranormal parasite that feeds on her fear, driving her crazy with threateningly smiling faces and painful memories from her past. The torture persists until the affected dies by suicide, passing on the virus to any witnesses. But Skye wants to find another way out.

While a smile is generally considered pleasant and the sign of a friendly face, there can also be something sinister about it. Maybe it’s too big or seems disingenuous. It can be especially troubling when a smile doesn’t reach a person’s eyes. This disturbing expression is used very effectively in the Smile movies as silent people with soulless grins plague the protagonist. Sometimes they appear suddenly, which is often good for a jump scare, or they just stare intently at their target, building intensity and letting anxiety mount until the valve is released to temporarily relieve the pressure.

Writer-director Parker Finn returns and picks up where the original picture concluded as Joel (Kyle Gallner) struggles to end the curse without bringing harm to an innocent person. Eventually, Skye becomes afflicted, though her instincts for handling scary situations are not always the best — by now, everyone should know investigating a mysterious noise or not keeping the lights on is a bad idea. Nonetheless, her public figure status puts her in a unique position to encounter more strangers and be generally surrounded by more people than the average person, which creates a lot of opportunity for her to be haunted. In addition, most of her freak outs are witnessed by dozens of bystanders and recorded for social media posterity. This idea of someone always watching adds an extra layer to Skye’s nightmare.

This movie definitely measures up to the first chapter, delivering all the anticipated creepiness with a good number of scares that rival its predecessor. It’s a little unrealistic that no one is willing to make the ultimate sacrifice to stop the entity once and for all, but apparently people’s (and the franchise’s) survival instincts are more persuasive.

Director: Parker Finn
Starring: Naomi Scott, Kyle Gallner and Rosemarie DeWitt

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Zombieland — Double Tap’ nuts up for the sequel (Includes first-hand account)

    It’s not always easy for actors — or audiences — to return to popular characters years after they were last seen. It means filling viewers in on anything they may have missed during the hiatus and finding a natural starting place for the story to resume. Yet, rejoining beloved personalities on their journey can be one of the greatest joys in cinema. Hopefully, rather than a rushed sequel, the follow-up is carefully planned and well thought-out. Perhaps allowing the characters to mature off-screen opens the door to different types of storylines previously incompatible with their arcs. In Zombieland: Double Tap, the foursome are still beating the odds, staying alive… and having fun.

  • TIFF 2015: Director and actor go with the flow in ‘River’ (Includes interview and first-hand account)

    Writing and directing one’s first feature-length film is already a daunting task, but setting it in a communist country halfway around the world is an added challenge that could have had mixed results. Jamie M. Dagg’s thriller, River, is set and shot in Laos, which was no vacation in spite of the exotic location. In addition to the “stifling heat,” there was “very little film infrastructure,” says Dagg. At the same time, “all these little things that seemed insurmountable problems contributed to the film.” The film’s star, Rossif Sutherland, agrees that the limitations were blessings in disguise; “We couldn’t have done it with a bigger budget and crew because we would have been too noticeable… You stick a crane in there and you lose the quality of what it is to be in that place.”

  • Review: ‘Why Don’t You Play in Hell?’ is bloody good fun (Includes first-hand account)

    Not every filmmaker has attended film school. After all, instinct cannot be taught. While less frequent, there are those whose education consists of no formal instruction but watching movies and experimenting. Their passion for filmmaking is often unmatched even if the quality of their work is subpar. Why Don’t You Play in Hell? centres on a group of guerilla filmmakers who are finally given the opportunity to fulfill their high school vow to make “the greatest movie ever made.”

  • Review: TIFF 2017: ‘The Captain’ is the unsettling story of an imposter (Includes first-hand account)

    It would seem the angles from which a film can look at war and its atrocities are endless. There’s the three basic perspectives of the two opposing parties and the citizens caught between, but each of these have countless possibilities from administrative and frontline roles to patriotic or conscripted soldiers to compliant or rebellious populations. Moreover, the many nuances available to each character confirm the complexities of conflict as well as continuously fascinate audiences. In The Captain, a young German soldier in WWII finds the world is his oyster after a lucky break near the end of the war.

  • Review: ‘Rams’ shows varied resilience in the face of conflict (Includes first-hand account)

    Being blood relatives doesn’t foster an immediate affinity or adoration of each other. Family feuds can be the most virulent as they tend to run deeper than simple disagreement and are often passed on to or inherited by future generations. However, on occasion, desperate or tragic circumstances can force even the most loathsome to put aside their differences. In Rams, two brothers and neighbours have not spoken in 40 years but a sickness in their community may demand change in more ways than one.