Review: ‘The End of the Tour’ is a compelling journey (Includes first-hand account)

Television series and movies often chronicle the lives of geniuses, either humorously or empathetically portraying the difficulties they have connecting to “normal” people. From misreading social cues to being frustrated by the inability of others to simply understand, they demonstrate that knowing more than the people around you can be devastatingly isolating. And yet their contributions to their fields make them eminent celebrities that everyone wants to meet. The End of the Tour recounts a fleeting connection made between an interviewer and a revolutionary author.

David Lipsky (Jesse Eisenberg) is a writer whose most recent book only experienced marginal success; a shortcoming that weighs heavily upon him. However when he reads an unconditionally stellar review of David Foster Wallace‘s (Jason Segel) Infinite Jest in Time magazine — which labels the book one of the best English-language novels published in 82 years — he insists Rolling Stone assign him to conduct the magazine’s first ever author interview (that they’d never publish). Joining Wallace at his remote homestead in Illinois not far from the university at which he teaches creative writing, Lipsky accompanies Wallace during the last stop on his book tour to Minneapolis.

The majority of the film consists of one long flashback while Lipsky listens to the recordings of his conversations with Wallace, which would inspire his memoir, Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself. It’s presented as the core narrative with the older journalist’s reflection on past events as the framing story. Unfortunately, Lipsky’s sudden case of nostalgia is triggered by the suicide of Wallace 12 years after their initial and only meeting. Though the acclaimed author was indifferent to being interviewed, he speaks very openly with Lipsky about a variety of subjects including love, success, loneliness, an array of insecurities and a brief institutionalization. Yet he only allows the reporter to record their discussions as long as he agrees not to print anything the speaker deems “off the record” five minutes later. Wallace is also very concerned about how Lipsky may represent him in the article, regularly commenting on previous statements and how they could be perceived if quoted. “I don’t even know if I like you yet, I’ve been so nervous of whether you like me,” he admits over dinner.

Wallace is a frequent philosophizer, commenting on the consequences of masturbation (the death of self via solo entertainment) and why women in magazines are less attractive than “real” women, leading him to eventually confess he wears the bandana to “keep his head from exploding.” Over the course of their five days together, it becomes apparent a meaningful friendship between the two would be challenging since they each envied each other’s lives. Wallace yearns for normalcy, which would include someone to come to home to and with whom to share his success and frustrations. Conversely Lipsky wants nothing more than to attain similar heights as a novelist, rising above the mediocrity (“My girlfriend likes your writing better than mine — it’s kind of annoying”). Their mutual jealousy causes them to consistently look at each other with suspicion, worrying the other could somehow steal what they covet. This resentment peaks when Wallace believes Lipsky is flirting with one of his female friends in Minneapolis.

The chemistry between Eisenberg and Segel is perfect as the terms of their relationship constantly shifts levels of comfortableness and congeniality. In spite of initially liking each other, Lipsky’s and Wallace’s roles are inherently in conflict: the interviewer must probe and ask the tough questions, while the subject is permanently self-aware and distrustful. Yet, within this process, no matter how superficial, a connection is made. In the end both actors portray the ultimate sadness these men experienced at this point in their life, neither satisfied with their current situations in spite of their accomplishments. This realization creates a resounding melancholy that underlies the whole narrative, especially given the events that prompt its telling — a feeling communicated by the outstanding performances of these two men.

Director: James Ponsoldt
Starring: Jason Segel, Jesse Eisenberg and Anna Chlumsky

Similar Posts

  • Review: Oscar-nominated Animated shorts are no small matter (Includes first-hand account)

    The Oscar-nominated animated short films range from light-hearted comedy to heartrending allegory. Some filmmakers tell tender tales that benefit from the shortened style, while others use it to deliver vital commentary on societal issues. Even the animation types vary from hand-drawn to computer-generated. But each is independently exceptional and deserving of the Academy’s recognition.

  • Review: ‘If Beale Street Could Talk’ is an impassioned & significant film (Includes first-hand account)

    Having one’s finger on the pulse of a nation, or even a large segment of it, is a difficult task and can be even harder to comprehensibly articulate. From the ‘50s to the ‘70s, James Baldwin‘s prolific writing and countless television appearances were expressing the plight of black America in a manner that was gaining increasing attention. He likely hoped by this time his work would be a snapshot of a former country and its hardships, but unfortunately it is as relevant now as it was then. Adapted from Baldwin’s 1974 novel of the same name, If Beale Street Could Talk is a passionate love story interrupted by a gross injustice.

  • Review: ‘The Witches’ is high-gloss, but still amusing (Includes first-hand account)

    While witches flying on broomsticks are an iconic symbol of Halloween, one has to wonder what they do for the other 364 days a year. Also, if they look as hideous as the holiday’s decorations suggest, how do they go unnoticed for all that time? In 1983, Roald Dahl wrote a story about a heinous group of witches with a sinister plan and an alternative family who will do everything in their power to stop them. The book was first adapted in 1990 with the help of Jim Henson, and now director Robert Zemeckis — who is no stranger to special effects-heavy pictures — has taken a turn. Roald Dahl’s The Witches is a relatively faithful adaptation of Dahl’s tale, though it’s been transported to 1968 Alabama.