A scene from ‘The Exorcist: Believer’

Review: ‘The Exorcist: Believer’ left its spirit in the ‘70s

‘The Exorcist: Believer’ follows the dissimilar parents of two teenage girls who are possessed by a familiar demon.

Demonic possession is a contentious issue. Historically, many cases characterized as possession were actually incidents of severe and undiagnosed mental illness that required medical treatment, not divine intervention. Some instances resulted in long-term harm and even death. Yet, there are allegedly records of confirmed possessions and exorcisms in which no medical cause could be determined for the afflicted’s behaviour. Whether one believes or not, it’s been the subject of countless films that aim to terrorize audiences with the demon’s physical and verbal violence. In The Exorcist: Believer, the parents of two girls must accept their children are possessed or watch them suffer slow, agonizing deaths.

Thirteen-year-olds Angela (Lidya Jewett) and Katherine (Olivia O’Neill) are best friends. When they lie to their parents to hang out after school, it seems like a harmless deception — until they fail to come home. They return three days later with no recollection of their disappearance, but appearing mostly unharmed, everyone just breathes a sigh of relief that they’re back. However, something is wrong. The girls are acting strangely and frightening their families. Angela’s father (Leslie Odom Jr.) seeks psychiatric help, while Katherine’s parents (Jennifer Nettles and Norbert Leo Butz) opt for home care and prayers. But this isn’t the first time this demon has possessed a young girl and they’ll need to combine their energies if they have any chance of saving their daughters.

It’s been 50 years since Captain Howdy turned out to be a malevolent spirit possessing Regan MacNeil (Linda Blair), but its return is lamentably lacklustre. Much of the appeal of the original The Exorcist (1973) was the horrors inflicted on Regan by the demon, frightening audiences with its unnatural, disturbing displays. The build-up was slow, but the ascent and climax were exceptional, consequently ranking it highly on countless “scariest movies of all time” lists. However, this picture flips the focus from the possession to the parents’ experience, which challenges their strength and devotion — and is simply less interesting. Katherine’s family is religious, yet they conceal her illness, possibly out of fear and/or shame. Angela’s father is agnostic, yet grows open to any and all possibilities if it means saving his daughter. Thus, the Catholics, Evangelical Christians and voodoo practitioners form an unprecedented coalition of beliefs, banding together to fight for the children’s souls — but even the exorcism is a bit tedious, with the exception of the eerie voodoo ritual.

Ellen Burstyn’s reprisal of Chris MacNeil lends very little to the story — they could have just as easily referenced her book about Regan’s possession without muddying the narrative by forcing her inclusion. Co-writer and director David Gordon Green previously revived the Halloween franchise with mixed results, but he unquestionably gets it wrong with this one. Most notably, it fails to be even remotely scary. While there’s only two attempted jump scares, the main disappointment is the portrayal of the possessions. The title event gets very limited screen time and what is depicted is not noteworthy. Of course, the film is inevitably being judged against the original picture, but that should have been understood during production and greater efforts should have been made. Even the closing scene, while sentimental in theory, just further underlines the film’s misdirection.

Director: David Gordon Green
Starring: Leslie Odom Jr., Lidya Jewett and Ellen Burstyn

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Happy Death Day 2U’ is a great gift for the fun-loving moviegoer (Includes first-hand account)

    The Groundhog Day theme has been repurposed more than once since it was released in 1993 with varying results. Its comedic properties are obvious, but that hasn’t stopped creators from using it in other genres like sci-fi and horror that, in some cases, have more dire consequences. One of the most surprising applications came in the unexpected slasher comedy, Happy Death Day, which employed the single-day-effect to create a fresh, entertaining narrative. But no one ever figured out what generated the loop… until now. In the immediate sequel, Happy Death Day 2U, it starts happening again — only this time we know why.

  • Review: ‘Doctor Sleep’ shines bright in a world of scary ghouls (Includes first-hand account)

    While studios continue to remake decades-old classics, there is growing popularity in producing follow-up narratives that build on rather than retell the original. It certainly helps if the source writer saw fit to revisit the characters in a new novel. With the incentive of adapting another of Stephen King‘s books for the screen and an interesting story to share with a wider audience, The Shining sequel hit theatres. Doctor Sleep is an extension of the first tale as it picks up a few decades in the future, i.e. our present.

  • Review: ‘Bloodshot’ forgets they’re still human (Includes first-hand account)

    Science and technology have been changing the way we live for centuries, particularly since the industrial revolution. From making tasks easier to extending life expectancies, the world is forever evolving due to new discoveries and innovations. Procedures and treatments allow some to “cheat death,” eradicating disease and repairing or replacing damaged parts. However, they’re still only able to reverse death in the movies… for now. Bringing back the dead has mixed results in fiction, but it’s typically a negative experience to some degree and must be rectified by the end. In Bloodshot, a soldier is revived with the superhuman ability to bring armies to their knees.

  • Review: Hot Docs world showcase is a brief journey to the other side (Includes first-hand account)

    At Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, the world showcase programme shares stories from other countries that can be shocking and/or triumphant. Audiences may discover how differently people live in another country, or conversely how much they have in common. In the case of the documentaries discussed below, viewers may find inspiration in one man’s accomplishment, empathy for a woman’s circumstances and insight into a complex economic arrangement.

  • Review: ‘Banksy Does New York’ captures the chaos, good and bad (Includes first-hand account)

    When graffiti artist and political activist Banksy announced a one-month residency in New York, it immediately piqued people’s interest. It wouldn’t be the first time he created works overseas, but it would undoubtedly be the most anticipated. By broadcasting his arrival, Banksy was guaranteed an audience for his social commentary that would prove to be some of his most provocative statements to date. The documentary Banksy Does New York is not an authorized account of his visit, but rather a chronicle of how it was experienced by the city’s residents.