A scene from ‘The Exorcist: Believer’

Review: ‘The Exorcist: Believer’ left its spirit in the ‘70s

‘The Exorcist: Believer’ follows the dissimilar parents of two teenage girls who are possessed by a familiar demon.

Demonic possession is a contentious issue. Historically, many cases characterized as possession were actually incidents of severe and undiagnosed mental illness that required medical treatment, not divine intervention. Some instances resulted in long-term harm and even death. Yet, there are allegedly records of confirmed possessions and exorcisms in which no medical cause could be determined for the afflicted’s behaviour. Whether one believes or not, it’s been the subject of countless films that aim to terrorize audiences with the demon’s physical and verbal violence. In The Exorcist: Believer, the parents of two girls must accept their children are possessed or watch them suffer slow, agonizing deaths.

Thirteen-year-olds Angela (Lidya Jewett) and Katherine (Olivia O’Neill) are best friends. When they lie to their parents to hang out after school, it seems like a harmless deception — until they fail to come home. They return three days later with no recollection of their disappearance, but appearing mostly unharmed, everyone just breathes a sigh of relief that they’re back. However, something is wrong. The girls are acting strangely and frightening their families. Angela’s father (Leslie Odom Jr.) seeks psychiatric help, while Katherine’s parents (Jennifer Nettles and Norbert Leo Butz) opt for home care and prayers. But this isn’t the first time this demon has possessed a young girl and they’ll need to combine their energies if they have any chance of saving their daughters.

It’s been 50 years since Captain Howdy turned out to be a malevolent spirit possessing Regan MacNeil (Linda Blair), but its return is lamentably lacklustre. Much of the appeal of the original The Exorcist (1973) was the horrors inflicted on Regan by the demon, frightening audiences with its unnatural, disturbing displays. The build-up was slow, but the ascent and climax were exceptional, consequently ranking it highly on countless “scariest movies of all time” lists. However, this picture flips the focus from the possession to the parents’ experience, which challenges their strength and devotion — and is simply less interesting. Katherine’s family is religious, yet they conceal her illness, possibly out of fear and/or shame. Angela’s father is agnostic, yet grows open to any and all possibilities if it means saving his daughter. Thus, the Catholics, Evangelical Christians and voodoo practitioners form an unprecedented coalition of beliefs, banding together to fight for the children’s souls — but even the exorcism is a bit tedious, with the exception of the eerie voodoo ritual.

Ellen Burstyn’s reprisal of Chris MacNeil lends very little to the story — they could have just as easily referenced her book about Regan’s possession without muddying the narrative by forcing her inclusion. Co-writer and director David Gordon Green previously revived the Halloween franchise with mixed results, but he unquestionably gets it wrong with this one. Most notably, it fails to be even remotely scary. While there’s only two attempted jump scares, the main disappointment is the portrayal of the possessions. The title event gets very limited screen time and what is depicted is not noteworthy. Of course, the film is inevitably being judged against the original picture, but that should have been understood during production and greater efforts should have been made. Even the closing scene, while sentimental in theory, just further underlines the film’s misdirection.

Director: David Gordon Green
Starring: Leslie Odom Jr., Lidya Jewett and Ellen Burstyn

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘The Strangers: Prey at Night’ is a massacre instead of thriller (Includes first-hand account)

    In the movie industry, “leaving well enough alone” isn’t a phrase that carries much weight. Even when it seems like they’ve struck lightening by achieving an acceptable level of acclaim or success, it’s just a reason to recycle and repeat. Usually this happens in the form of a remake or an immediate sequel, capitalizing on whatever formula worked the first time around. However, occasionally (though more frequently as of late), someone decides to continue a story years after the original. The narrative time that’s past is often comparable to the gap between films and in most cases the original characters return for another go. The latest follow-up to an older movie is The Strangers: Prey at Night.

  • Review: ‘Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark’ is limited by age, not scares (Includes first-hand account)

    In every culture, there is a tradition of telling stories to pass down wisdom, as well as warnings about the dangers young people need to learn to avoid. Some of these evolved into local folklore, urban legends or just fictions to frighten and entertain. Passed down between generations and eventually recorded, sharing these tales is a pastime that many enjoy… and some — particularly young campers around campfires — dread. In 1981, Alvin Schwartz published a compilation of these chilling, short narratives, which became a secret pleasure for many adolescent readers. Now, Guillermo Del Toro has produced a big-screen adaptation with its own spectral storyteller, Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark.

  • Review: TIFF 2018: Cheer on ‘The Extraordinary Journey of Celeste Garcia’ (Includes first-hand account)

    In addition to being hilarious, there was another reason fans gravitated towards Douglas Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series — it was about an ordinary bloke in uncommon circumstances in an alien world. If the truth is, in fact, out there, perhaps one day some aspect of these stories could prove to be true. Forget travelling the world… people could travel the universe. In The Extraordinary Journey of Celeste Garcia, a woman with a relatively banal existence is presented the opportunity of a lifetime and she can’t wait to accept.

  • Review: Jack O’Connell continues trend of skillful silence in ‘71’ (Includes first-hand account)

    The chaos and confusion experienced in a mob causes people to make ill-advised decisions that can result in harm to themselves or others. Getting carried away in the situation or restricting one’s focus to a single detail can have equally damaging consequences. But some of these responses often seem uncontrollable in the heat of the moment. In ’71, a soldier performing crowd control becomes lost in enemy territory.