Review: Wes Anderson’s style transfers brilliantly to ‘Isle of Dogs’ (Includes first-hand account)

Anthropomorphizing animals has been a common technique in fictional narratives for decades. It allows storytellers to convey tales in a manner that may be more effective or less jarring for viewers… and sometimes, it’s just more entertaining. Writer/director Wes Anderson has focused most of his career on live-action dramas featuring increasingly famous actors and developing a very distinct style, but he now appears to be embracing animation to deliver his unique stories with the latest being Isle of Dogs. Yet if audiences dig a little deeper, they’ll notice many of the same themes as seen in his other pictures — just in a different format.

After an outbreak of dog flu and fears it could spread to humans, Mayor Kobayashi (Kunichi Nomura) decrees all K9s are to be exiled to Trash Island. In spite of scientists’ claims of a nearly complete cure, the first victim of this ruling is the mayor’s orphaned nephew’s guard dog and friend, Spots. Within six months, all dogs have been banished and they’ve established a society of roaming packs, fighting for scraps they find in the trash. When “the little pilot” (Koyu Rankin) crash lands nearby, the now master-less dogs are eager to help him — all except for their leader, Chief (Bryan Cranston), who was a stray and doesn’t share his pack’s affection for humans. Nevertheless, the group of dogs accompany the boy on his search for Spots, while various K9 advocates on the mainland demand their return home.

In addition to having a stellar voice cast, there are other interesting things happening with the dialogue in this picture. There is a disclaimer at the beginning of the film that explains the humans speak their native tongue, while all the dogs’ barks are relayed in English. There is an in-story translator who interprets official events, but most other dialogue is left for viewers to guess (unless they speak Japanese). This has an interesting effect on the narrative as audiences are left to infer the nature of some of the characters’ conversations without the benefit of the exact wording.

For someone who’s considered an auteur filmmaker, making the leap to a different medium — in this case, animation — could have a significant effect on their presentation. Yet, Anderson manages to keep more than a semblance of his signature style. From the descriptive chapter headings to the witty, loquacious characters to the underdogs (no pun intended) that drive the story forward, key elements of his work are there. When compared to his first foray into the genre, Fantastic Mr. Fox, it becomes clear Anderson is now establishing a unique style in this medium as well. Similar to his live-action films, the screen is drenched in colour and detail. Moreover, his commitment to the story’s appearance is demonstrated by his decision to use the more laborious, hand-crafted stop-motion style, which fits beautifully with his aesthetic. Finally, there is once again no shortage of well-known actors attached to the picture, lending their voices to the brilliant personalities Anderson has created: Cranston, Edward Norton, Bill Murray, Jeff Goldblum, Bob Balaban, Greta Gerwig, Frances McDormand, Scarlett Johansson, Harvey Keitel, F. Murray Abraham, Yoko Ono, Tilda Swinton, Ken Watanbe and Liev Schreiber.

we choose to believe that this isn’t how dogs are made pic.twitter.com/XTx2ideXjm

— Isle of Dogs (@isleofdogsmovie) March 17, 2018

It’s not easy to maintain a sense of cuteness while telling a relatively dark story, yet Anderson walks this line comfortably. It’s not about to make anyone tear up or coo with delight like a children’s cartoon, but it is fully engaging. The added history of cats vs. dogs that underlies the main plot provides an intriguing extra layer to the tale of friendship and heroism.

Director: Wes Anderson
Starring: Bryan Cranston, Koyu Rankin and Edward Norton

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Boy and the World’ is a sad, wondrous and vivid journey (Includes first-hand account)

    To a child, the world is both full of wonder and anxiety; unknowns are both exciting and frightening; the wide open space outside their front door both calls for exploration and holds the terrifying possibility of becoming lost. The desire to understand is often overwhelming, even though the answer may exist beyond their grasp. In the Oscar-nominated animated film, Boy and the World, a child sets out alone to find out why his father has not returned home.

  • Review: ‘Jurassic World’ forgot to cultivate its entire realm (Includes first-hand account)

    Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park was a monumental release. Based on the book of the same name by Michael Crichton, the pair created an epic action-adventure-science-fiction picture that wowed audiences with its incredible special effects and grand story concept. For those two hours in 1993, dinosaurs became real. Now more than 20 years later, Hollywood has once again decided to reach back in time for its latest movie idea, recreating the fantastic park for a new generation. However Jurassic World may impress audiences fresh to the series, but fans of the original franchise will likely be less dazzled.

  • Review: ‘Black or White’ has the uncomfortable conversations (Includes first-hand account)

    Preliminary judgement based on physical traits is virtually engrained in our psyche. When you look at someone, the first thing you notice is their physique, desirability and/or skin colour. No level of education can reverse this process, but as a character in this film suggests, “What matters is your second, third and fourth thought.” Race relations are at the centre of Black or White, but it earnestly explores covert prejudices that many are hesitant to admit and are difficult to eradicate.

  • Review: ‘The House with a Clock’ will start new generation of horror fans (Includes first-hand account)

    Some of the key elements of young adult fiction is the adolescent protagonist makes mistakes that can be attributed to their immaturity, while also finding the strength to triumph over whatever villain or personal obstacle is at the tale’s centre. This formula is so generic, it allows for any number of narratives in any number of genres, meaning it never gets old because you never have to tell, read or watch the exact same story twice. Thus, even though The House with a Clock in its Walls features some aspects seen in other tales, it is its own picture.