A scene from 'Roofman'

Roofman review: Being good-natured doesn’t mean making good decisions

‘Roofman’ is the strange but true story of an escaped convict that found love while hiding out in a toy store.

Struggling to make ends meet is not unique to any type of person, culture or country. People need money to survive. Not having enough of it means making difficult decisions and possibly going without something. This can be most challenging when children are involved since it’s harder for them to understand or accept. Kids are also one of the key motivations for doing something you might not even consider otherwise. Failing to provide for his offspring is the primary reason a veteran turned to armed robbery in Roofman.

Jeff Manchester (Channing Tatum) served in the armed forces, but hasn’t held a full-time job since coming home. Still, he wants nothing more than to prove he can be a provider. After yet another disappointment, he decides it’s time to earn money by any means necessary. Jeff is a skilled observer, which makes him an excellent thief. Breaking into McDonald’s roofs, he politely robs the staff without hurting anyone. However, his lack of criminal know-how leads to his inevitable arrest. Nevertheless, Jeff eventually uses his unique abilities to break out of prison and take up residence in a Toys”R”Us store.

If Jeff — and Tatum’s portrayal of him — wasn’t so charming, this story would be incredibly creepy. The escaped convict builds a makeshift home in one of the toy store’s displays. He sleeps during the day among unaware shoppers and plunders the shelves at night.

Growing bored of his lonely escapades, Jeff sets up cameras to spy on the employees. He engages with the video like it’s a TV show. There’s a villain (the curmudgeonly store manager played by Peter Dinklage), an underdog (the spineless stock person played by Emory Cohen) and a love interest (single-mother Leigh, played by Kirsten Dunst). The key difference is Jeff can and does interfere with the storyline, particularly when the manager mistreats the staff.

Jeff narrates the story, providing candid insights into his choices. He describes why his unconventional tactics work, while also explaining his ultra-poor decisions. It adds another layer of humour to the bizarre saga and connects audiences more deeply to the main character.

Overall, this is an enjoyable picture that provides Tatum an opportunity to combine his goofy and dramatic sides. Leigh represents Jeff’s second chance at life. But her religious interests and his living a lie don’t amount to the highest compatibility score. Nonetheless, the extended middle part of this narrative is a love story.

Co-writer and director Derek Cianfrance is usually behind edgier romances. Unfortunately, the film’s attempts to align with the real-life events on which it’s based results in too many details and too long of a movie. It would have been better without the lull in the middle as audiences chaperone too many of Jeff and Leigh’s dates. This is one of those rare instances where a montage may have been more appropriate. After all, watching Jeff’s out-of-the-box methods to avoid detection are way more interesting than watching two people fall in love.

Director: Derek Cianfrance
Starring: Channing Tatum, Kirsten Dunst and LaKeith Stanfield

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Final Girl’ values visual style over character development (Includes first-hand account)

    In the ‘80s, it became apparent that characters that committed certain sins in slasher films — sex, drugs, alcohol — were destined to literally get the axe. These signs of imminent death gradually evolved into rules for surviving a horror movie, as so eloquently expressed in Wes Craven’s self-referential slasher Scream. But in addition to the killer’s practices, another convention emerged — the sole survivor or hero of these bloody rampages was almost always a young woman. She became known as the “final girl” and a symbol of female strength (though there were definitely some issues with her construction). Now a movie has taken the title and used it to turn the tables on the attackers in Final Girl.

  • Review: ‘Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark’ is limited by age, not scares (Includes first-hand account)

    In every culture, there is a tradition of telling stories to pass down wisdom, as well as warnings about the dangers young people need to learn to avoid. Some of these evolved into local folklore, urban legends or just fictions to frighten and entertain. Passed down between generations and eventually recorded, sharing these tales is a pastime that many enjoy… and some — particularly young campers around campfires — dread. In 1981, Alvin Schwartz published a compilation of these chilling, short narratives, which became a secret pleasure for many adolescent readers. Now, Guillermo Del Toro has produced a big-screen adaptation with its own spectral storyteller, Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark.

  • Review: Hot Docs doesn’t want anyone left in the dark on these issues (Includes first-hand account)

    While not all documentary cinema needs to be serious or enlightening, these films certainly have an important place in the genre. Following the old adage, “a picture is worth a thousand words,” a movie can only further illustrate issues not easily explained or provide evidence of an overarching problem. At Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival, the “silence breakers” programme features films in which its subjects are drawing attention to topics that require our consideration and demonstrating that there are people trying to instil change. And in a slightly different context, a different political commentary was slipped into the “artscapes” category this year.