A scene from 'The Outer Threat'

The Outer Threat review: Strong characters power a quiet sci‑fi thriller

‘The Outer Threat’ explores what happens to a family that becomes unexpectedly responsible for humanity after discovering alien life.

Statistically, it’s nearly impossible for alien life not to exist beyond our solar system. The galaxy is immeasurable, and there must be other stars and planets with the right cocktail to create and sustain life. That’s not to say all extraterrestrials are intelligent. But maybe there are other civilizations out there, making different or even better choices than humanity. In The Outer Threat, a family deals with the consequences of discovering life on another planet.

Daniel’s (Mark O’Brien) head is always in the stars. Michelle (Constance Wu) tires of his neglect and their kids, Maddy (Callista Crowe) and Francois (Isaac Smelcer-Zhang), have grown accustom to his absence. But his perseverance may have finally paid off. He’s discovered a Dyson sphere that proves the existence of life on another planet. Michelle, who’s an astrophysicist, confirms Daniel’s findings, reigniting her interest in their work and maybe their relationship. But when Daniel reaches out to their government contractor against Michelle’s wishes, the reaction is immediate. Power and network outages bring the country to a standstill. But who could be responsible for such a fast and widespread response?

Most science fiction films about extraterrestrials focus on the encounter and the miscommunication or conflict that follows. Regardless of the reason the aliens reach out, humans are almost certainly going to screw it up with their natural proclivity for mistrust and hostility. However, this movie takes a different approach. It isolates the experience to a few people and the impact of a planet millions of miles away. The family is very smart, but they’re otherwise average people suddenly confronted with the decision of whether they should contact a distant lifeform on Earth’s behalf.

The catastrophe of their discovery arrives with a whisper, not a bang. With no power or internet, the world doesn’t immediately devolve into chaos. In fact, with a few potentially harmful exceptions, everything winds down without incident. There are no explosive traffic pile ups or planes falling out of the sky. The grid just stops working. Yet, even without the carnage and disaster, it’s the tightknit family’s reaction to danger that draws audiences into the narrative.

It initially takes some time to build a connection between viewers and the characters, imitating the disconnect within the family. The husband-and-wife team used to conduct research together, but Michelle chose to prioritize their family. In the meantime, Daniel secludes himself in a bunker, consumed with the task of monitoring a Cold War-era telescope and driving a wedge in their relationship. He tries to justify his obsession by grasping at the smallest anomalies. But like the boy who cried wolf, when Daniel finally makes a real discovery, no one wants to listen.

As parents, they are still civil and caring in spite of their strained relationship. The couple are able to have rational discussions that don’t turn into screaming matches, even when they disagree. But maybe that’s just the Canadian script.

The sibling love in this picture is also woefully rare. It’s refreshing to see a brother and sister support each other rather than resent the other’s existence. The whole family engages in playful teasing, but nothing they say is mean spirited. And when the adults want to talk seriously, they find actual privacy — not just a room in the house where the kids can eavesdrop.

The source of the muted attack and persistent drone surveillance has many suspects. It could be their own government, a foreign power, aliens or maybe even artificial intelligence. Finding the origin is key to stopping the passive assault. However, writer-director William Woods acknowledges that based on the rapid evolution of technology and world affairs vs. the time it takes to make a movie, the story as it’s presented is already too late to be relevant to current affairs.

Nonetheless, as a survival film it provides a new perspective. There are two approaches to living in this new world. The first is using your own resources and smarts to stay alive. The other is taking advantage of the trust and naivete of the people you encounter. Not everyone is as intellectually equipped as the family to figure their way out of a jam. But their mix of brains and brawn serve them well in this realm of unknown threats.

Wu and O’Brien have great chemistry. They carry on with sincerity, speaking convincingly about science that will go over most people’s heads — including their own, they admit. The family dynamic is key and the four actors interact so naturally together. It gives audiences a positive anchor from which to explore the sci-fi mystery. The small cast is also buoyed by William Fichtner. He has a knack for playing morally corrupt personalities, but the intentions of the paternal diner owner they briefly meet is a little more ambiguous.

The script’s strength is its character development. Audiences gradually learn about the family and their individual assets, which ranges from sharpshooting to technology. Unfortunately, once the big reveal occurs, the simplicity of their solution and the foreshadowing that accompanies it weakens what was generally an interesting story.

Director: William Woods
Starring: Constance Wu, Mark O’Brien and William Fichtner

Similar Posts

  • The Bride review: It lives in chaos

    ‘The Bride’ is a frenetic tale of female empowerment from the perspective of a woman who demands agency in her second life.

  • Review: ‘Black Panther’ excels by not compromising (Includes first-hand account)

    Even though Marvel Studios launched the Marvel Cinematic Universe with its better-known properties, they haven’t been afraid to take a chance on less mainstream characters. One of the reasons is each franchise is approached in a manner that best suits its unique personality. Of course, there are numerous similarities that can be seen across any number of stories, but it’s the elements that make them different that appeal to audiences (and make the many team-ups more attractive). All superheroes battle villains, but it’s how they do it that creates fans. Black Panther is the latest protector to get his own theatrical release and they didn’t cut any corners.

  • ‘Solo’ swaggers with the best in the galaxy (Includes first-hand account)

    More than 40 years ago, audiences were introduced to a loveable scoundrel whose chauvinist charm won hearts and fearless audacity earned envy. Han Solo’s love affair with Princess Leia, almost lifelong friendship with Chewbacca and affection for the Millennium Falcon are just some of his most recognizable traits. But he was already an established pilot and smuggler when he made his entrance into the Star Wars universe, so little was known about his past. Although where Han came from was not a question on the tip of many tongues, it is an answer his fans may find interesting. Thus, the latest standalone film in the franchise, Solo: A Star Wars Story, goes back to the hero’s beginnings.

  • Review: ‘Aquaman’ is king of the DCEU (Includes first-hand account)

    DC has been trying to follow in Marvel’s cinematic footsteps for years, but they’ve been unable to find the same level of success. In spite of their television shows doing relatively well and gaining significant followings, their films have always been lacking. However, they may finally be moving in the right direction. Parts of Justice League were passable and Wonder Woman blew everything else they’d done out of the water. Now, after introducing several characters in the big screen team-up, it’s time for them to helm their standalone pictures. First up is the king of the sea, though that’s not his title when this movie starts — at first, he was just Aquaman.

  • Review: ‘Forever Plaid’ is a fun blast from the past (Includes first-hand account)

    When compared to cinema, one of the stage’s greatest advantages is its acceptance of minimalism. There are countless narratives that unfold in a single location with nominal set decorations, few to no costume changes and visible musical accompaniment. In addition to just being logistically simpler, it also demonstrates a confidence in the talent and quality of the work. Forever Plaid features four guys on a stage with a three-piece band and a few props … and that’s it.