A scene from ‘A Match’

TIFF ’23 Review: ‘A Match’ doesn’t sugar coat hypocrisy

‘A Match’ follows a young woman dreading her arranged marriage, while also demonstrating why she can’t defy her parents.

In many countries, women have been given the illusion of control and autonomy, but eventually the time comes when tradition takes over and their futures are once again decided for them. Being a rebel and rejecting the status quo can have severe consequences, including shunning by one’s family, shame for yourself and your loved ones, and being ostracized from the community. It’s a lot of guilt to carry for what is essentially a selfish act, even if it’s warranted. In A Match, a young woman dreams of a career, but her parents only wish is to find her a suitable husband before it’s too late.

Savita (Nandini Chikte) is in the last year of a sociology degree and is studying for her final exam, which she then hopes to follow with a job in her field of study. Her two best friends are on similar paths. However, even though their parents have indulged their educations, the ultimate goal is to find them a good husband so they can become dutiful wives and mothers. Savita has met many suitors, but they’ve all rejected her for one reason or another. Her parents are desperate, while she’s simply glad she doesn’t have to quit school. But a series of events puts all their plans in jeopardy with potentially no favourable result.

For outsiders, the matchmaking process may seem complex and a bit bizarre. Representatives for each family, typically older male relatives, make arrangements for a meeting. The prospective husband and several of his male relatives/friends/etc. come to the young woman’s home, where they’re treated as VIPs by her father and other male relatives/friends/etc. Eventually, she’s called upon to sit on display and answer a standard set of questions about her family, studies, abilities and height. Then the guests step outside to discuss before ultimately declaring they’ll let her family know what they decide via their envoys. Notably, the young woman is simply the object in a transaction between the men.

The hypocrisy is not lost on the characters, but they are also resigned not to break custom and risk hurting their families. Yet, in spite of these well-known conventions, flirtations and what might be considered dating still occurs amongst the young people without fixed marriages. However, they are not allowed to pick their own matches so falling in love generally only leads to heartbreak. The actors’ portrayals are interesting as emotions are not explicitly expressed, so their true feelings are hidden in their words or expressions. Thus, a stoic appearance is often concealing pain or heartache, while the exchange of sly, sideways smiles are the only public demonstrations of affection.

From a Western perspective, the girls’ circumstances are difficult to accept, but the film does an excellent job of trying to ensure audiences from all ilks can at least understand everyone’s positions –even if they can’t agree with them.

A Match had its world premiere in the Discovery programme at the Toronto International Film Festival.

Read other reviews from the festival.

Director: Jayant Digambar Somalkar
Starring: Nandini Chikte, Taranath Khiratkar and Sangita Sonekar

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ blends action and eloquence (Includes first-hand account)

    When considering the existence of monsters, one has to understand they are not a fabrication of contemporary society nor are their origins restricted to it. Ghosts have been said to represent ancient spirits; vampires are rumoured to have risen during the Crusades or earlier; and werewolves are a product of Native legend. Therefore it’s not incredibly far-fetched to re-imagine popular fiction in the context of some supernatural scourge. Most wouldn’t consider Jane Austen as the first choice for such a transformation, but Seth Grahame-Smith‘s adaptation of her novel was clever and surprisingly consistent. Now Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is a movie, but with a significantly different plot twist.

  • Hamlet review: TIFF 2025

    ‘Hamlet’ is a contemporary production of Shakespeare’s play, updating the setting to modern-day England, but not the dialogue.

  • Review: This week’s releases are intentionally disturbing

    This week’s releases include an idyllic nightmare; the unbelievable story behind the story; a series of horror vignettes; the joining of many genres; even more movies about a sex symbol; and a scary holiday classic.

  • Review: ‘Crimson Peak’ is the epitome of a gothic horror romance (Includes first-hand account)

    There’s a problem in the horror industry that’s existed for decades and shows no evidence of being solved in the near future: the movies are frequently marketed incorrectly. There’s an assumption that unless a film is revealed to be frightening in the trailers, people won’t go to the theatre to watch it. However misrepresenting pictures or disclosing all the greatest scares during its promotion causes audiences to feel cheated and can affect profits once word gets around that it’s not what was promised. As much as one hopes this will not be the case, this may be the fate of Crimson Peak, which is unlikely to fulfill the false hopes of a scary film-going experience.

  • Review: ‘The Wave’ drops the disaster movie into international waters (Includes first-hand account)

    Hollywood disaster movies are a dime a dozen. As some impending doom c/o Mother Nature threatens a city, country or the human race, a person or group attempts to find a way to avert total annihilation. In addition, there is generally a parent and/or spouse — usually a father and/or husband — who launches a seemingly impossible rescue attempt to save his family. Big effects and wild imaginations make these thrillers a spectacle of the screen, but they must still find a balance between the visual and the narrative. Most recently, Norwegians take on this genre in The Wave.