A still from ‘Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?’

Review: ‘Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?’ is an expert display of verbal sparring

‘Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?’ remains one of the rawest depictions of a married couple on stage or screen.

In 1966, real-life couple Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor delivered unmatched performances as a mature couple who keep the fire in their marriage burning by exchanging scathing remarks while entertaining a young couple in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Mike Nichols’ feature directorial debut would garner widespread acclaim and earn five Oscars, including Taylor’s second Academy Award for best actress. While this is the quintessential presentation of Edward Albee’s 1962 play of the same name, many have made the characters their own in countless theatres. The latest is Canadian Stage’s production, starring another real-life couple, Paul Gross and Martha Burns, which is now playing at Toronto’s Bluma Appel Theatre.

George (Gross) is a history professor and Martha (Burns) is the daughter of the school’s president — one of many matters of contention between the long-married couple. After returning from a faculty cocktail party organized to welcome Nick (Rylan Wilkie), a new teacher, and his wife, Honey (Hailey Gillis), Martha informs George the pair of young people are coming over for a nightcap. As the hours drag on to dawn and everyone becomes more inebriated, the older couple play a game of doing their best to embarrass each other in front of their bewildered guests.

The play opens by introducing audiences to the coarse dynamic between George and Martha, which will inform the rest of the evening’s mood. Gross is excellent as the disenchanted husband who wavers between ignoring his wife’s harsh remarks to retorting with equally witty barbs. Burns’ performance is slightly less brash than Taylor’s, making her appear less venomous but equally spiteful. Honey’s breezy naiveté is always a delight as her intoxication compels her to unknowingly encourage their impish quarreling with Gillis playing the innocent waif to a tee. Unfortunately, Mac Fyfe, Gillis’ real-life husband who was meant to play Nick, needed to step away from the production for undisclosed medical reasons, so Wilkie stepped into the role with only five days of rehearsal. While his delivery is on point, he regrettably still required a copy of the script for reference, which was occasionally distracting.

Unfolding within the confines of George and Martha’s living room, the play is three hours and 30 minutes, including two intermissions — though it did feel as if the first break could have been later, negating the need for a second. Gillis infuses her scenes with misplaced whimsy and “dances like the wind,” while Wilkie expresses Nick’s frustration at being made a pawn in George and Martha’s toxic diversion before deciding to join in the contest. Most notably, Gross and Burns have flawless timing, never missing a beat in their paltry attempts to outmanoeuvre each other until neither has any moves left and the illusion must finally end.

Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf? runs from January 18 to February 16, 2025.

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ is all cheers, no tears (Includes first-hand account)

    Origin stories are so powerful — and not just for superheroes. Seeing where and how someone or something began in some ways removes a bit of the mystique; but it can also earn them respect, admiration and gratitude. People are naturally curious, particularly about things they feel close to, so they are keen to consume information and media related to the object at the centre of their fandom. In some ways, it bridges the gap and strengthens their connection to something that will always be out of reach. The aptly titled, Bohemian Rhapsody, is another way into the world of Queen.

  • Review: ‘Gold’ is filled with riches and rocks (Includes first-hand account)

    During the Gold Rush, most lands were untouched and anyone could strike it rich with a little luck. But the more metal deposits they found, the harder it became to find new ones. Now trained geologists study the composition of certain areas and try to predict the location of new resources, but it’s not an exact science and there’s more misses than there are hits. In Gold, two guys who’ve experienced significant misses in recent years may have finally found the target.

  • Review: ’45 Years’ is a slow burn that leaves an indelible mark (Includes first-hand account)

    People always marvel at couples whose relationships have lasted several decades, let alone a half-century or more. The subjects of their admiration often admit it hasn’t been perfect, but it’s been good enough that they still want to be together. The less inspirational response asks, “Who wants to start again after x number of years?” After so long, it’s easy to assume you know everything there is to know about your partner and there couldn’t possibly be any surprises left… at least certainly not anything earth-shattering. Unfortunately that theory is proven false in 45 Years.

  • Review: ‘If Beale Street Could Talk’ is an impassioned & significant film (Includes first-hand account)

    Having one’s finger on the pulse of a nation, or even a large segment of it, is a difficult task and can be even harder to comprehensibly articulate. From the ‘50s to the ‘70s, James Baldwin‘s prolific writing and countless television appearances were expressing the plight of black America in a manner that was gaining increasing attention. He likely hoped by this time his work would be a snapshot of a former country and its hardships, but unfortunately it is as relevant now as it was then. Adapted from Baldwin’s 1974 novel of the same name, If Beale Street Could Talk is a passionate love story interrupted by a gross injustice.