Review: ‘Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald’ rambles onward (Includes first-hand account)

There are certain worlds in which fans don’t mind spending all of their time. The opportunity to see elements for the first time, learn things one didn’t already know or realize, and simply hang out with beloved characters is appealing in itself. However, it’s not necessarily enough to maintain their attentions over long periods of time. Thus, sophisticated stories are required to fill the gaps and tie everything together so it’s not just a conveyor belt of things to look at. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is filled with amusements, but it needs a solid narrative accompaniment.

Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) is back in London, caring for his magical creatures and pining for Tina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston). After his unsanctioned trip to America, he’s still on the outs with the Ministry with little hope for resolution. However, when Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) escapes custody and is traced to Europe, it’s all hands on deck to recapture him and figure out his interest in a young Obscurial named Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller). As Jacob (Dan Fogler) and Queenie (Alison Sudol) also get mixed up in the investigation, Dumbledore (Jude Law) refuses to take part; therefore, Aurors, Theseus Scamander (Callum Turner) and his fiancé, Leta Lestrange (Zoë Kravitz), must lead the charge, while Grindelwald gathers supporters for his dark cause.

This is the second installment in the five-part series, once again written by J.K. Rowling who delights (and profits) in people’s enthusiasm for her characters. However, this episode makes the series feel more like The Hobbit than Harry Potter as it doesn’t serve much of a purpose. Once viewers reach the end of the two-hour-and-14-minute picture, it becomes painfully obvious the film was little more than a set-up for the next chapter and could’ve been summed up in a much shorter time. Where everything in the first film felt fresh and essential, this one seems to be unnecessarily stretching out the narrative. Moreover, its need to remain vague in order to push the final act makes it somewhat jumbled and confusing at times.

Yet, in between all the filler, there are still wonderful characters, fascinating creatures and striking effects. Newt’s individualism is highlighted in this picture as he’s shown to have been a bit of a loner at Hogwarts, secluding himself with his magical creatures in a hidden alcove. But his thinking is also different from those around him, which is likely why Dumbledore likes him so much. The Niffler cute factor is increased exponentially by the appearance of several furry, baby thieves, while Pickett is given the opportunity to live up to his name. However, other than a beautiful water horse in Newt’s underground sanctuary, there’s really only two new creatures introduced: a large serpent with a cat’s face called a Zouwu and Matagots, which are fearsome felines with glow-in-the-dark eyes.

Depp’s chameleon abilities and love for disguises makes him a wonderful villain, while his charm makes him a great Grindelwald as he cleverly manipulates people to stand at his side in the coming global wizarding war. In the last act, he’s given the opportunity to shine via a grand speech, which is followed by a stunning display of power. But nothing negates the fact that the crux of the film is located in a handful of key scenes and the last 30 minutes of the movie, making more than two-thirds of the picture noticeably superfluous.

The Wizarding World you know, the story you don’t. #FantasticBeasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald NOW PLAYING in theaters! #ProtectTheSecrets Get tickets: pic.twitter.com/7R42DwEzTb

— Fantastic Beasts (@FantasticBeasts) November 16, 2018

Director: David Yates
Starring: Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston and Dan Fogler

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘On the Basis of Sex’ follows a modern-day suffragette (Includes first-hand account)

    If everyone accepted everything as it is, there would never be any change. It’s thanks to those who oppose the status quo that the world has the opportunity to become better for everyone. Whether it’s proposing new ideas or revolutionizing old ideals, the trailblazers light the way for everyone that follows. These principles couldn’t be truer than when reviewing the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. Determined lawyers, political activists and ordinary citizens fought across the country against race and gender discrimination, and now the fight continues for the LGBTQ community. But change had to start somewhere and Ruth Bader Ginsburg is shown leading the way in On the Basis of Sex.

  • Review: ‘Hobbs & Shaw’ is pumped to reinvigorate the franchise (Includes first-hand account)

    With eight movies under its belt and at least a couple more on the way, everyone knows what to expect when they go to watch the a Fast and the Furious movie: fast cars, high-speed chases, entertaining quips, an emphasis family and a “do or die” attitude. But with the franchise potentially coming to a close, the studio would understandably have an interest in branching out and extending its longevity. Thus, they approached two of the series’ side characters about starring in a spinoff together — they’re already well-liked by audiences, so they’re the perfect candidates for launching a new franchise in the same world. And this brings us to, Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw.

  • Review: ‘Dark Star: H.R. Giger’s World’ expands on the artist’s legacy (Includes first-hand account)

    Many artists gain notoriety after their death. While their lives are chronicled, it’s often through a posthumous biopic in which it’s necessary the artist be portrayed by some actor who mimics their ability for the screen. However more documentary filmmakers have been taking the opportunity to record their talents and tales while the subject is still alive and able to share a first-hand account. Though Dark Star: H.R. Giger’s World is being released after the artist’s death, it’s still a privileged instance in which a notoriously private figure opened his life for the film.

  • Review: ‘She Who Must Burn’ is intelligent and pointed horror (Includes first-hand account)

    Religious zealots take up causes they consider an affront to their belief system and go to extreme measures to eradicate the perceived threat in some way. Consequently health clinics have had to employ increased security to protect those who dispense or seek reproductive services, particularly abortions. The methods of the opposition can be quite frightening and She Who Must Burn portrays the worst of the worst.