Review: Us scares audiences with a piercing reflection (Includes first-hand account)

It’s long been believed that everyone has an identical, unrelated lookalike somewhere in the world. However, there’s little conjecture about whether these doubles are connected in any way other than their appearances. Do they have the same blood type? Do they experience the same kinds of injuries? Do their life trajectories parallel each other in any manner? Or are they polar opposites in every way? If the latter is true, would the less fortunate twin carry resentment for this fabled person living their best life? Director Jordan Peele‘s Us addresses some of these questions with a disturbing twist.

When Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o) was very young, she became lost in a boardwalk carnival’s house of mirrors. Now an adult with a family of her own, she’s returned to the same seaside town with her husband, Gabe (Winston Duke), and two children, Zora (Shahadi Wright Joseph) and Jason (Evan Alex). Adelaide is doing her best to control her anxiety, but there’s been a number of uncanny coincidences since they arrived and she’s afraid they’re signs of an impending threat. Her fears are confirmed when they receive a group of late-night visitors — a family dressed in red jumpsuits that look eerily like them. But where did these doppelgangers come from and what do they want?

The film opens with a commercial for the oddly conceived, only-in-the-‘80s phenomenon, “Hands Across America,” which proposed people linking hands for 15 minutes from coast to coast. Film fans may notice the VHS tapes framing the television, including C.H.U.D., The Man with Two Brains, The Right Stuff, A Nightmare on Elm Street, and one of three Corey Haim references in the picture, The Goonies. Starting the film in Santa Cruz on the same boardwalk on which The Lost Boys was shot in 1986 is definitely not an accident. Peele is simultaneously paying homage to these formative movies, while examining the culture in which they emerged. The filmmaker has also been vocal about wanting to make a movie about a black family at the beach who buy a boat because it’s almost never shown even though it does actually happen.

The concept of the “other” is a pertinent topic at the moment — particularly one that suffers at the expense of those who prosper. The doppelganger concept is used to explore this idea of “them” and “us,” where one is barely aware the other exists and the other despises every second they live. The explanation for the lookalikes’ existence has a bit of a sci-fi element, but it’s almost offered in passing. The important part is they are here, they are angry and they have a plan.

There’s somewhat of a The Strangers element in the picture too as the doubles’ introduction is via a frightening home invasion in which they hold their counterparts hostage. An alternative strategy to this one is presented later in the movie, but the former is clearly designed to torment the family —particularly Adelaide, who Red, the opposing matriarch, blames for her horrific existence. Yet, in spite of the inevitable violence, most of the blows occur off-screen as it finds more effective ways to disturb viewers without graphic carnage.

Much like Get Out, there’s a slow-building suspense to the true terror of the film. But there’s something much creepier about this picture as it’s established early on that something dangerous is lurking around a nearby corner and its patience is growing thin. Adelaide’s constant uneasiness radiates from the screen, which is one of many accomplishments by Nyong’o in this movie. Her portrayals of Adelaide and Red are enthralling, driving the narration and creating two divergent personalities that could never co-exist. The entire cast plays their doppelgangers and all of their performances are exceptionally eerie as you’d never guess they were the same person — their transformations, both physically and emotionally, are so contradictory, it’s simultaneously impressive and chilling. Duke has the added duty of supplying the film’s comic relief, which thankfully alleviates the tension and gives audiences the occasional chance to relax.

The ending isn’t unpredictable, but it raises more questions than answers. There’s a nature vs. nurture debate as one wonders if the twins are inherently evil, or if they became that way because of how they’re forced to live. There’s mention of a soul making one person more “real” than the other, but how that idea is applied to the conclusion is puzzling. And most obviously, what happens next?

They look just like us. US opens in theaters March 22: March 13, 2019

Director: Jordan Peele
Starring: Lupita Nyong’o, Winston Duke and Elisabeth Moss

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Annabelle Comes Home’ is a practised source of dread (Includes first-hand account)

    While some people love and collect vintage porcelain-faced dolls, others rightfully find them incredibly creepy. They inherently seem to have a certain level of sadness or malice attached to them. Long before Chucky took to the screen, people were suspicious of children’s toys. The Annabelle doll had many homes, but it all started when a grieving family adopted her as their surrogate and opened the door to a malevolent demon who terrorized them and all future owners. Eventually paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, were able to contain the evil. In Annabelle Comes Home, a girl learns the meaning of the old adage, “Curiosity killed the cat.”

  • Review: ‘A Christmas Horror Story’ is a gift-wrapped Halloween treat (Includes first-hand account)

    Since retail stores insist on displaying Halloween and Christmas decorations at the same time, why shouldn’t that crossover apply to other things like movies? Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas is the chief (and least horrific) example in which the holidays intertwine; but other films include the Silent Night, Deadly Night series, Black Christmas and a killer Santa Clause short in the Tales from the Crypt movie. The latest picture to frighten the cheer from yuletide celebrations is A Christmas Horror Story.

  • Review: ‘Born to be Blue’ wants you to know there’s more to Chet Baker (Includes first-hand account)

    Great power may come with great responsibility; but great talent — that comes with heartache and temptation. Sex, drugs and, in this case, jazz are a way of life not easily avoided by artists. Whether you call it a weakness or a crutch, neither fully encapsulates the power these vices can have on a person. Chet Baker was one of the best trumpet players the scene had ever seen — and he knew it. But he was also convinced he was even better on the brass when he was high. As a result, Baker spent most of his career feeding a heroin addiction. Yet in contrast, Born to be Blue portrays a brief period in the musician’s life when he wasn’t always on the nod.

  • Review: New ‘Ghostbusters’ makes us feel good (Includes first-hand account)

    The leading issue with pre-determined notions regarding a yet-to-be-released movie is that they’re generally unfounded, even if not always disproven. Most people are aware that promotional campaigns, particularly trailers, can do a great disservice to otherwise likeable and/or respectable films. And while a distaste for remakes that don’t add anything meaningful to the conversation is warranted, there are exceptions to the anti-remake position. One of the most notable is when a studio and/or filmmaker is eager to deliver a new perspective on a classic narrative, rather than simply rehashing what was done before. Paul Feig‘s Ghostbusters is that exceptional movie.