A scene from‘Nandor Fodor and the Talking Mongoose’

Review: ‘Nandor Fodor and the Talking Mongoose’ has a particular sense of humour

‘Nandor Fodor and the Talking Mongoose’ is a curious comedy that centres on a conversational animal with a tricky appointment schedule.

There are different types of paranormal investigators. Those who believe and find evidence to support their convictions. Those who do not believe and approach each phenomenon with the intent of proving it’s a farce. And those who want to believe, hoping they will find authenticity where they’ve only uncovered falsehoods — Houdini, for example, fell into this category. The existence of the supernatural is a hotly debated issue as concrete evidence is difficult to come by, even though documenting efforts have evolved over time. In Nandor Fodor and the Talking Mongoose, a researcher is invited to meet a creature with an uncanny ability.

Nandor Fodor (Simon Pegg) is a renowned paranormal investigator, though he’s alienated most of his community with his scientific approach that seeks to disprove any supernatural phenomenon. However, a letter from a fellow respected researcher (Christopher Lloyd) convinces him to take the case of Jeff, the talking mongoose. An entire town is convinced of his existence, though only the Irving family with whom he spends most of his time claim to have actually seen him speak. Alongside his assistant, Anne (Minnie Driver), Nandor heads to the rural community to conduct his own inquiry into this talking creature, but is confronted with contradictory evidence of his existence.

This is an unhurried, dry comedy that will not hold everyone’s attention. The humour arises from the conversations and bizarre situation, which is inherently comic as each attempt to confirm the phenomenon is met with an absurd obstacle. But most of the wit is relatively subtle, making audiences work for their chuckle. Pegg is already known for his comedic timing, featuring in a number of successful comedies or adding humour to otherwise dramatic, action-oriented pictures. However, he adopts an unusual accent for this character, which is probably one of the film’s few shortcomings as it feels out of place. Meanwhile, Driver is charming as ever, though Anne could have been better utilized and played a larger role.

As for Jeff, filmmakers make every effort to keep his identity — and even his existence — a mystery to the very end of the picture. Nandor is, of course, correct to question the reality of a talking mongoose, though the opening history of talking animals, narrated by Neil Gaiman, suggests the notion is not impossible. Nonetheless, every indication points to a sham — until a sign to the contrary reignites the debate. This cycle repeats throughout the narrative, taking viewers on a rollercoaster of discovery and disbelief right until the credits roll, which is both captivating and frustrating for viewers who are simply along for the ride. In the meantime, audiences can imagine their own version of Jeff hanging around off-screen.

This is an unusual tale, but at a tight 96 minutes, it’s difficult to find a lot to complain about in this peculiar little comedy.

Director: Adam Sigal
Starring: Simon Pegg, Minnie Driver and Christopher Lloyd

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Lights Out’ is scary in all the right places (Includes first-hand account)

    It’s not the actual darkness that frightens most people, but whatever danger may be lurking in the black void that they can’t see – and therefore can’t effectively defend against. Whether real or supernatural, we’re taught from an early age to be cautious of things that go bump in the night. Moreover the ancient dichotomy of light and dark is ingrained in our consciousness, inherently teaching that one is good and the other bad. Horror movies often exist in the shadows, taking advantage of these impulses and the lack of visibility to tell scary stories. Lights Out is one of the best concepts to leverage these fears in cinema.

  • Review: ‘Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald’ rambles onward (Includes first-hand account)

    There are certain worlds in which fans don’t mind spending all of their time. The opportunity to see elements for the first time, learn things one didn’t already know or realize, and simply hang out with beloved characters is appealing in itself. However, it’s not necessarily enough to maintain their attentions over long periods of time. Thus, sophisticated stories are required to fill the gaps and tie everything together so it’s not just a conveyor belt of things to look at. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is filled with amusements, but it needs a solid narrative accompaniment.

  • Review: ‘Incredibles 2’ used its time away wisely (Includes first-hand account)

    Fourteen years ago, before Marvel had taken over the world of superhero cinema, audiences fell in love with a family that had extraordinary abilities. And then they went back underground and many doubted they’d ever be seen again. Finally, writer/director Brad Bird announced he was ready to return to their story — literally — as the sequel picks up exactly where the first film left off. It’s been a long wait, but Incredibles 2 (which could have also been named “The Rise of Jack Jack”) was certainly worth it.

  • Review: ‘Pride and Prejudice and Zombies’ blends action and eloquence (Includes first-hand account)

    When considering the existence of monsters, one has to understand they are not a fabrication of contemporary society nor are their origins restricted to it. Ghosts have been said to represent ancient spirits; vampires are rumoured to have risen during the Crusades or earlier; and werewolves are a product of Native legend. Therefore it’s not incredibly far-fetched to re-imagine popular fiction in the context of some supernatural scourge. Most wouldn’t consider Jane Austen as the first choice for such a transformation, but Seth Grahame-Smith‘s adaptation of her novel was clever and surprisingly consistent. Now Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is a movie, but with a significantly different plot twist.