Review: ‘Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald’ rambles onward (Includes first-hand account)

There are certain worlds in which fans don’t mind spending all of their time. The opportunity to see elements for the first time, learn things one didn’t already know or realize, and simply hang out with beloved characters is appealing in itself. However, it’s not necessarily enough to maintain their attentions over long periods of time. Thus, sophisticated stories are required to fill the gaps and tie everything together so it’s not just a conveyor belt of things to look at. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is filled with amusements, but it needs a solid narrative accompaniment.

Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) is back in London, caring for his magical creatures and pining for Tina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston). After his unsanctioned trip to America, he’s still on the outs with the Ministry with little hope for resolution. However, when Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) escapes custody and is traced to Europe, it’s all hands on deck to recapture him and figure out his interest in a young Obscurial named Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller). As Jacob (Dan Fogler) and Queenie (Alison Sudol) also get mixed up in the investigation, Dumbledore (Jude Law) refuses to take part; therefore, Aurors, Theseus Scamander (Callum Turner) and his fiancé, Leta Lestrange (Zoë Kravitz), must lead the charge, while Grindelwald gathers supporters for his dark cause.

This is the second installment in the five-part series, once again written by J.K. Rowling who delights (and profits) in people’s enthusiasm for her characters. However, this episode makes the series feel more like The Hobbit than Harry Potter as it doesn’t serve much of a purpose. Once viewers reach the end of the two-hour-and-14-minute picture, it becomes painfully obvious the film was little more than a set-up for the next chapter and could’ve been summed up in a much shorter time. Where everything in the first film felt fresh and essential, this one seems to be unnecessarily stretching out the narrative. Moreover, its need to remain vague in order to push the final act makes it somewhat jumbled and confusing at times.

Yet, in between all the filler, there are still wonderful characters, fascinating creatures and striking effects. Newt’s individualism is highlighted in this picture as he’s shown to have been a bit of a loner at Hogwarts, secluding himself with his magical creatures in a hidden alcove. But his thinking is also different from those around him, which is likely why Dumbledore likes him so much. The Niffler cute factor is increased exponentially by the appearance of several furry, baby thieves, while Pickett is given the opportunity to live up to his name. However, other than a beautiful water horse in Newt’s underground sanctuary, there’s really only two new creatures introduced: a large serpent with a cat’s face called a Zouwu and Matagots, which are fearsome felines with glow-in-the-dark eyes.

Depp’s chameleon abilities and love for disguises makes him a wonderful villain, while his charm makes him a great Grindelwald as he cleverly manipulates people to stand at his side in the coming global wizarding war. In the last act, he’s given the opportunity to shine via a grand speech, which is followed by a stunning display of power. But nothing negates the fact that the crux of the film is located in a handful of key scenes and the last 30 minutes of the movie, making more than two-thirds of the picture noticeably superfluous.

The Wizarding World you know, the story you don’t. #FantasticBeasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald NOW PLAYING in theaters! #ProtectTheSecrets Get tickets: pic.twitter.com/7R42DwEzTb

— Fantastic Beasts (@FantasticBeasts) November 16, 2018

Director: David Yates
Starring: Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston and Dan Fogler

Similar Posts

  • Review: TIFF 2018: ‘Kursk’ is frustrating because you know how it ends (Includes first-hand account)

    It takes a talented filmmaker to create a movie based on historical events in which audiences can still become absorbed even though they already know how the story will end. The greatest success is causing the viewer to hope against hope that somehow a tragic ending can be transformed into a happy one. Titanic is probably the most obvious example of such an achievement, but there have been others before and since. War movies are similar in that the events portrayed are familiar, though the fates of the particular characters are not always known. In Kursk, it’s an implicit conflict that led to the deaths of more than two dozen men.

  • Review: ‘The Grinch’ appreciates and builds up from its roots (Includes first-hand account)

    It seems like one of the simplest ways to capitalize on the holidays is recycle/reimagine a classic tale for a contemporary audience. Granted, many of the most beloved Christmas cartoons are more than half-a-century old — but their age doesn’t make them any less endearing or enjoyable. Nonetheless, there is an unexplainable and explicit need to remake these specials using modern techniques and padded storylines. The latest to get this treatment (for the second time) is Dr. Seuss’ own green grouch, who despises merry occasions and happy people. The Grinch is now a feature-length animation with some extra plot.

  • Monsters hide in plain sight in this week’s releases

    This week’s releases include a battle between two formidable weapons of mass destruction; grandparents whose grief take them down a dark road; a would-be basketball star hit with one an endless stream of obstacles; and a cult that serves an ancient water god.