Review: ‘The Price We Pay’ fails to uncomplicate costs of tax avoidance (Includes first-hand account)

Globalization and the state of the economy continues to be a hot topic of analysis, accusations, recommendations and predictions. Recovery after the recent worldwide financial crisis has looked different in most countries as governments sought appropriate ways to bolster their markets and support their citizens; expectedly, some have been more successful than others. But most democratic nations are built around the concept of a welfare state in which taxes are used to support publicly funded programs and infrastructure that protect and promote the well-being of its citizens. The Price We Pay provides an in-depth exploration of how companies are avoiding their “fair” contribution to this system and the consequences of their actions, particularly on the middle class.

To begin with, to look at this issue from any angle is complex, which is in some ways the reason corporations have been able to operate as they have for so long. The documentary crew speaks to a variety of political and financial experts, some of whom were formerly employed by companies who stand accused of participating in tax evasion, and their interviews comprise the how, what and why of the film. The term “offshore bank account” is widely known, but one section of this picture actually drills down what that means in today’s world where financial wealth no longer has a fixed address. They also review a number of other tactics and how they affect the lives of ordinary citizens. The dialogue is intercut with a variety of images from nature, particularly storms, which metaphorically parallel the subject being discussed.

The matters discussed in this picture are fascinating as they explore the history of tax avoidance and put a spotlight on global enterprises that currently employ these methods, depriving governments of trillions of dollars in tax revenues by harboring profits in offshore havens. However when considering such complicated themes, the use of revolving talking heads can deliver an overwhelming amount of information with no chance to digest or reflect. It simply jumps from one professional to the next, each expelling a vat of knowledge that they know thoroughly but the audience may be hearing for the first time.

While there is an attempt to lay the speakers’ voices over captivating images to escape what is generally believed to be the documentary kiss-of-death — people just talking to the camera — it needs more. There needs to be an effort to explain the topics examined more plainly via comparisons to everyday life, charts, graphics, animations or other devices that help simplify the discussion. On the very rare occasion one of these is utilized, the element being relayed becomes immediately clearer.

Nonetheless the collection of presenters the filmmakers assemble is extensive, though mostly one-sided. While representation of the multinational corporations is restricted to their testimonies at congressional hearings, the movie includes people from business and academia to address the issue of tax avoidance including its harm and resolutions. Solutions such as global cooperation to eliminate tax havens, and ensure companies are taxed appropriately and the monies collected are distributed properly are proposed; and even though these sound effective, they will likely never materialize in the current state of affairs. Thus this picture is more of an eye-opener than a provider of answers.

Director: Harold Crooks

Similar Posts

  • Review: ‘Kung Fu Panda 3’ continues to inspire with its relatable hero (Includes first-hand account)

    Animated films are often built around concepts to help viewers understand, accept and cope with things they may encounter in their lives. Fittingly, the movies about a seemingly clumsy bear have generally offered messages about self-confidence and achieving one’s potential via the protagonist, while encouraging tolerance and not judging anyone based on their appearance through the other characters. But once a picture has endeared audiences to its personalities, it has the opportunity to expand its sphere. In the sequel, they must conquer their fears and work together to face overwhelming odds. Now, in Kung Fu Panda 3, the characters tackle the more complex idea of nature vs. nurture and what constitutes family.

  • Review: ‘John Wick 3: Parabellum’ delves deeper and hits harder (Includes first-hand account)

    Action movies and thrillers driven by revenge have been commonplace since the ‘70s. When someone with access to a gun or other weapons is wronged, it seems to be a recipe for enacting cold, hard, brutal vengeance against everyone responsible. But “every action has a consequence” and unflinching, ruthless violence is bound to eventually draw blood from a forbidden pool. Running only gets you so far and then confrontation, surrender or – if you’re lucky – negotiation become the only options. In John Wick 3: Parabellum, the title character opts for all-out war against anyone who tries to stand in his way.

  • Review: ‘Death Wish’ leaves the difficult questions to the professionals (Includes first-hand account)

    Vigilantism is a divisive topic — even one person can have multiple opinions that place them on both sides of the argument. Is it ever acceptable for someone to act as judge, jury and executioner? Is it okay in some instances, but not others? What responsibility does the justice system have to hold vigilantes accountable? What about their part in creating vigilantes? Are superheroes, who are essentially taking the law into their own hands, also vigilantes? There’s a lot of room for discussion and film is the ideal playground to explore these grey areas. Currently, the issue is being tackled in the remake of the 1974 film of the same name, Death Wish.

  • Review: ‘The Riot Club’ inspires conversation, but is it the right one? (Includes first-hand account)

    With all the indignation currently directed at white men in power and people of privilege around the world, it’s interesting to view a movie that exemplifies all the qualities despised in the advantageous. This film particularly takes aim at the old boys clubs and secret societies that purportedly allow and encourage disrespectful behaviour because their members have the resources to “make it go away.” The Riot Club begins as a group of boys united by their love of women and trouble, but gradually turns ugly as their above average station in life becomes a weapon against the less fortunate.

  • Review: ‘Green Book’ is swelling with kindness and humour (Includes first-hand account)

    Though it may not seem like a big deal now, there was a time when certain things simply weren’t done… and many of those things stemmed from the colour of our skin. While some areas were quicker to progress past segregation and the like, others were staunch in their backwards beliefs and tightly held on to them until the choice was no longer theirs. But there were brave men and women who accepted the responsibility of forcing change, as well as the consequences when their efforts were poorly received. In Green Book, an accomplished black musician embarks on a tour of the South.