Review: ‘Beirut’ is methodical but not well planned (Includes first-hand account)

Being able to navigate tenuous relationships and correctly gauge people’s feelings is a specific and valuable skill. While it could have multiple applications, a key use for such an ability is negotiations… and if one learns to harness and hone these instincts, the sky’s the limit on where they could go. It, of course, has everyday practical uses such as getting the best price on a car or asking for a raise; but on a larger scale, it can mean talking down someone who’s suicidal, navigating peace talks or discussing terms with a hostage-taker. In Beirut, such a man is an important asset.

Mason Skiles (Jon Hamm) had worked his way up a ladder that put him in contact with countless foreign dignitaries in Beirut. However, when a young man he considered family is implicated in a terrorist plot, everything he worked for is destroyed. Moving back to the U.S., Mason makes a living as a union mediator with a fairly good success rate. Though the location has changed, his ability to understand and anticipate someone’s next move is just as sharp. Thus, 10 years after his return home, the CIA asks him to return to Beirut to negotiate the exchange of a government agent for one of the world’s most wanted terrorists.

This is a slow thriller in which the most intense moments involve talking and waiting. There’s a bit of action sprinkled in for good measure, but it’s the dialogue that wields the power in this picture. Mason’s alcoholism is just a factor they have to account for and at least means they can generally rely on finding him in the local bar after he’s evaded his escorts on one of many occasions. There are certain elements of the story meant to be surprising, but intuitive viewers will know what’s coming before it’s confirmed by the reveal. This unfortunately takes away from some of the narrative’s force, relegating it to the ranks of adequate but not extraordinary.

The wrong move could cost him his life. See Jon Hamm in BEIRUT, now in theaters. Buy tickets here: pic.twitter.com/KUdC1rjL3t

— Beirut (@beirutthemovie) April 11, 2018

The role of Mason simply appears to be a less elegant version of Hamm’s former Mad Men character, who was also a bit of a cowboy and an alcoholic that made his living convincing people of things. Still, this narrative called for a slightly gruffer, steelier personality and Hamm delivers. Mason’s contacts during the mission are played by Shea Whigham and Rosamund Pike, whose characters have different motivations and approaches to handling Mason and their predicament. While Mason tries to figure if they can be trusted, he also masterminds the plan that will ensure the safe return of the kidnapped agent. Watching him do this is just a matter of going through the motions — it’s not edge-of-your-seat riveting, but it is interesting enough to get audiences to the end.

Director: Brad Anderson
Starring: Rosamund Pike, Jon Hamm and Mark Pellegrino

Similar Posts

  • No one messes with Charlize Theron in ‘Atomic Blonde’ trailer (Includes first-hand account)

    There is a long line of one-man wrecking machines who are able to takedown entire operations without assistance. Their backgrounds vary from government agents to experienced assassins to angry fathers or all of the above. Yet their female counterparts are almost non-existent. But that’s about to change with Charlize Theron‘s latest picture, Atomic Blonde, in which she portrays an elite MI6 spy.

  • Review: ‘The Intruders’ left something behind (Includes first-hand account)

    Uprooting one’s life to move to a new home, or especially a new town, can be distressing. The unfamiliar can easily become frightening and/or appear threatening. Anxieties are amplified and everything appears alien or suspect. Compound that with existing mental health issues and you get the terror experienced by the young woman at the centre of The Intruders.

  • Review: ‘Morgan’ treads in the deep before moving to shallower territory (Includes first-hand account)

    While early scientific advancements are often made in the name of helping people, it doesn’t take long for those same discoveries to be manipulated and applied to more experimental endeavours that are simply meant to satisfy curiosities rather than serve the greater good. Or, as is often the case, a military-purpose is determined and the finding is taken in never-intended directions. While those very close to the project may retain an emotional attachment, the decision-makers tend to be more aloof and concerned with the bottom-line. In Morgan, these two positions clash over the survival of a synthetic being.